Where is the proof?

[Darth Omar]

You know, I don't know how anyone can think you are a Trump supporter.

Nope, no support for Trump in the above post.

He may hate Trump in secret or love him.

I can't tell which.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

No intel was behind the birther thing though. It was all a grass roots conspiracy.

What intel is there on collusion?

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

Notice how they carefully qualify their question with the bolded text above? There was collusion. That isn't up for debate. Some of it was illegal. Some of it was dangerous...like having Russian/Turkish operatives privy to classified briefings.

Whether or not the Russian propaganda machine caused the trump win, or whether it was the fact that Hillary was the wrong candidate in a year when 'change at any cost' was the dominant theme will be debated for years to come.

But the collusion is not up for debate.

That is not true, there still is no concrete evidence of collusion. I'm so sick of you lying liberals.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

Exactly this.

This wasn't instigated by "liberals." 16 intelligence agencies started it.

That is an absolute lie. Damn, you're habitual.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

No....16 intelligence agencies were directed by the Commander in Chief though proxy of his AG and FBI director to investigate any possible Trump Russian Collusion...and after 18 months the only thing Obama appointees could do was to leak the classified names of US citizens to the press and congress. If there was evidence....Trump would have been jailed before the election.

What I find strange is the fact that Obama's dept. of justice launched no such investigative effort when they had objective evidence that a foreign nation had directly hacked into the actual voting machines during his campaign against McCain. Strange indeed, its only after the left lost its political power....they decided to investigate something that has been going on for over a decade.

Exactly.

All this time and still no proof of any collusion. But liberals said without proof within one week of Trump's accusations, meant they were false, even after Trump called for an investigation. Two faced liberals strike again.

The only proof I've seen is that Russia did in fact hack the DNC and the DNC desperately wants to avoid talking about what was hacked because it showed they CHEATED Bernie. But look, the Russians!

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

Because nobody official has actually made the allegation, only that there is a lot of evidence that makes it look like Rump was colluding with Putin. Rump actually made the fake claim about Obama.

This is why there are investigations into Rump... no allegations yet.

I see, so because it is just internet warriors claiming there is proof of collusion, they don't need to offer proof, is that right?

How do you know the claim was fake? Isn't there still an investigation going?

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

What did the intelligence community & the FBI have to say about Obama's place of birth?

Nothing, what have they said about collusion?

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

I never said that Russia colluded w/ Russia.

I actually haven't said that Trump colluded w/ Russia, either - all I & most have said is that they should investigate it. That's it. And they are - and we'll know soon enough.

Yet you claim officials have said there is 'something' about collusion because you said my comparison to the birther thing was false. Gotta get better in keeping up with your lies.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

Why do you think it needs to be investigated if you don't think it happened?

Seems kinda silly doesn't it?

LOL, poor Thingy. I bet he never said Obama's birth should be investigated based on as much evidence as Trump colluded with Russia.

He just feels it should because it would assuage his butt hurt over Trump winning.

I believe, with a 99% accuracy, that this will end up being the new birfer thing.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

Where did I say that I didn't think it happened?

It may have, it may not have. There is enough smoke there that there might be a fire. It's worth investigating.

Chill. We'll know soon enough. If they don't find anything, you can come on here & lie & say that we all guaranteed there would be something.

Well, at least four JPP liberals claim it has already been proven and of course you don't say anything about that.

Notice how they carefully qualify their question with the bolded text above? There was collusion. That isn't up for debate. Some of it was illegal. Some of it was dangerous...like having Russian/Turkish operatives privy to classified briefings.

Whether or not the Russian propaganda machine caused the trump win, or whether it was the fact that Hillary was the wrong candidate in a year when 'change at any cost' was the dominant theme will be debated for years to come.

But the collusion is not up for debate.

And look at the 3 people who thanked her. You're so partisan blind, yet want so desperately for people to believe you're not.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

You know, I don't know how anyone can think you are a Trump supporter.

Nope, no support for Trump in the above post.

Claiming that something is false about Trump, means I support him?

That is most dishonest thing you've probably ever said. How is saying something is not true about someone, mean you are a supporter?

I predict you will never explain it, because you know deep down it is bullshit.

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

Yet you claim officials have said there is 'something' about collusion because you said my comparison to the birther thing was false. Gotta get better in keeping up with your lies.

That is so dumbed down.

I just feel bad for you at this point. It's like some sort of desperation to save face.

Don't lie about people, and you won't have to do that.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

That is so dumbed down.

I just feel bad for you at this point. It's like some sort of desperation to save face.

Don't lie about people, and you won't have to do that.

See, this is what you do. You don't even respond to the actual discussion, you just claim someone is dumb and lying.

You do this quite often. Sad really.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

Where is the proof of your 16 intel agencies? You have never produced it, even after being asked.

Put up or shut up.

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

See, this is what you do. You don't even respond to the actual discussion, you just claim someone is dumb and lying.

You do this quite often. Sad really.

Sorry, but that's what it was. Incredibly stupid.

I'd like to say "and you know that," but maybe you don't.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

Sorry, but that's what it was. Incredibly stupid.

I'd like to say "and you know that," but maybe you don't.

Let's try to get you back to the discussion, if you can. Why is the comparison false?

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

Let's try to get you back to the discussion, if you can. Why is the comparison false?

There was nothing at all behind the birther movement. That was a conspiracy theory.

Are you really suggesting that there is nothing behind this? That Trump tweeted for a week against our intelligence community for nothing? That a GOP Congress is dedicating an investigation based on liberal conspiracy theories? That guys like McCain & Graham are demanding an investigation just to quiet the lefties?

Please say yes.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

There was nothing at all behind the birther movement. That was a conspiracy theory.

Are you really suggesting that there is nothing behind this? That Trump tweeted for a week against our intelligence community for nothing? That a GOP Congress is dedicating an investigation based on liberal conspiracy theories? That guys like McCain & Graham are demanding an investigation just to quiet the lefties?

Please say yes.

You, yourself said, that there is nothing so far.

Don't fall back on others, that is a logical fallacy. Just because others don't like Trump and want an investigation, does not mean there is evidence. Yet, you claim the comparison is false, despite, having no evidence of Trump collusion.

You're an idiot.

And again, what did the 16 intelligence agencies say? Spit it out you little weasel.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

LOL

Okay, Yurt. A Congressional investigation - by a GOP Congress - compares exactly to the birther movement.

Fuck you. I'm totally done w/ you and your BS spin. Go accuse more liberals of defending murder. What a joke.

So, you once again don't provide any evidence for you claim about 16 intelligence agencies and you refuse to discuss your claim my comparison is false.

It doesn't matter if there is a congressional investigation, the POINT, you simpleton, is, that this will end up being FALSE just like the birfer thing

My goodness, how dumb can you be? I am not comparing every single thing, only that this will and 99% sure, is false, just like the birfer issue.

For pete's sake, how stupid can you get? Why not claim that Trump hasn't been sued over as proof there is no comparison.

LOL

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

Exactly this.

This wasn't instigated by "liberals." 16 intelligence agencies started it.

Thingy refuses to provide any evidence of this claim.

Why is that?