^^^
Doesn't understand why Vance didn't deny climate change exists.
Yeah, no. And you're a tard. Buh-Bye now.^^^
Matt is drunk again. LOL
Vance was certainly smoother and proved he could lie with a straight face. Walz seemed nervous.Vance likely “won” in a traditional sense, but Vance’s 1/6 duck of the question will bite him in the ass.
Additionally both of them coming across as calm and reasonable makes trump look even worse.
"They're eating the dogs, they're eating the cats."Vance likely “won” in a traditional sense, but Vance’s 1/6 duck of the question will bite him in the ass.
Additionally both of them coming across as calm and reasonable makes trump look even worse.
Got it, Matt the Drunk. Have a good night!Yeah, no. I'm drunk and will leave to go pass out on the floor and shit myself.
True, but the 1/6 and who won the election questions were even more revealing.Vance avoided the $ question on global warming
I still say Vance won as a debater.I don't think this will move a single vote... Folks who agree with the one will believe they "won", folks that agree with the other will think they "won" and nothing will change.
You mean like when Walz ducked the question about why he LIED about the timing of his visit to China? Like that?Vance likely “won” in a traditional sense, but Vance’s 1/6 duck of the question will bite him in the ass.
Additionally both of them coming across as calm and reasonable makes trump look even worse.
Overall, I agree. The difference being that Vance was playing to Trump voters and Walz was appealing to the middle. "A return to sanity".I don't think this will move a single vote... Folks who agree with the one will believe they "won", folks that agree with the other will think they "won" and nothing will change.
^^^"They're eating the dogs, they're eating the cats."
Trump is certainly going to lose. Enjoy!
Have I told you lately that you're a fucking idiot?^^^
More evidence Matt is letting his liquor speak for him.