Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Did he say they were eating the dogs and cats?Walz said 140 cops were beaten to death on Jan 6
Did he say they were eating the dogs and cats?Walz said 140 cops were beaten to death on Jan 6
Walz said 140 cops were beaten to death on Jan 6
How many were beaten during Floyd protest while he did nothingHuh?
He said 140 cops were beaten - and some died afterward.
Trump intentionally screamed, “they are eating the dawgs”Walz said he made friends with school shooters. Yeah,...I know it was just a gaffe,....but a BAD one.
No major gaffs. Vance dodged more than lied about how great and innocent Trump was.I was thinking there wasn't a sound byte from this one - they just had the moment that will be talked about.
That could come back to bite Team Crazy, but he's playing to an audience of one in this case.Vance really fucked up refusing to answer the peaceful transfer question.
How many were beaten during Floyd protest while he did nothing
Climate Change, huh? That's the hill your fucktarded ass wants to die on?Vance dodges the question of climate change.
Honest assessment......Both candidates made good points and came across well. BUT.....Walz had at least three low moments,...didn't see any from Vance. Therefore I would score this a win for Vance. Call it.......10-8. Vance.
^^^Climate Change, huh? That's the hill your fucktarded ass wants to die on?
Okay.
Disagreed on the weighting but agreed it is close. Still, Vance refused to answer the question about the peaceful transfer of power, can't explain how Trump would pay for all of these big programs while cutting taxes for the rich and tacitly threw the 1/6 terrorists under the bus.I'd call that a very fair assessment.
Vance is a better debater in general - he was more polished. But neither guy hurt the top of their ticket.
^^^
Doesn't understand why Vance didn't deny climate change exists.
^^^
Vance likely “won” in a traditional sense, but Vance’s 1/6 duck of the question will bite him in the ass.Honest assessment......Both candidates made good points and came across well. BUT.....Walz had at least three low moments,...didn't see any from Vance. Therefore I would score this a win for Vance. Call it.......10-8. Vance.