Who's better?

Who's better?


  • Total voters
    3
Actually there are some who believe that the current body of Mao is a wax replica. They botched his original preservation. They would've had to do that, or touch him up significantly.
 
China didn't make war on anyone though.

Besides, in 200 or 300 years Hitler won't be seen the way we see him anyways.

Apparently General Billy hasn't heard of the Korean War, the Sino-Indian War 1962 or indeed the Spratly Islands which could be a potential flashpoint sooner or later!!
 
Last edited:
Apparently General Billy hasn't heard of the Korean War, the Sino-Indian War 1962 or indeed the Spratly Islands which could be a potential flashpoint sooner or later!!

The Korean war was a war of self-defense (aimed at the preservation of their ally North Korea from western aggression), so was the Sino-Indian war (merely aimed at recovering Chinese territory illegally occupied by India).
 
Stalin's tomb was torn down during destalinization, he's now in a grave somewhere.
The Kremlin wall.
Lenin is still hanging out though, on display since 1924.
Do you think he is wax too?

image.jpg


He looks pretty good for someone who has been dead for 92 years.
 
China didn't make war on anyone though.

Besides, in 200 or 300 years Hitler won't be seen the way we see him anyways.

Hitler's ideology was so childish and farcical that there's really nothing about him or the Nazi movement to keep future generations intellectually stimulated. Discussing Hitler is only ever fascinating due to WWII, "German efficiency," and the way his outburst against the civilized world severely altered history. The only thing of note, really, was how he got Germany out of the depression before anyone else could. But that intriguing tidbit is nullified by the fact that the communist USSR out-produced him during the war.

Marxism is equally childish and farcical, yet it has cleverly created its own language, which it constantly uses to trap people into an excruciating and pointless conversation. You say "up," and they kindly inform you that they reject your bourgeois-capitalist definition of "up," and, regardless, you are using it out of context, anyway. Nevertheless, Marxism has managed to attract many intellectuals who are willing to harp-on about it, thus giving it longevity. To use a China reference, it has become a cult like Nazism, but the trendy sort of cult, like Falun Gong, and the government seems unable to stamp it out, yet will never admit defeat.
 
The Korean war was a war of self-defense (aimed at the preservation of their ally North Korea from western aggression), so was the Sino-Indian war (merely aimed at recovering Chinese territory illegally occupied by India).

Yeh I don't agree with any of that, as for illegally occupied territory can I mention the Spratly Islands again?
 
Yeh I don't agree with any of that, as for illegally occupied territory can I mention the Spratly Islands again?
He doesn't know where they are. The Chinese attempt at claiming all the south China sea as their territorial waters has played a major role in the U.S. recent treaty to open two new bases in the Philippines. The Philippine people are not exactly thrilled with the treaty but the Chinese claiming the Spratly's woke their asses up.
 
Back
Top