You'd never say this about Muhammad.
Who's more of a martyr. St. Floyd or Jesus?
- Thread starter Irish
- Start date
You'd never say this about Muhammad.
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
Islam isn't talked about much here. But if Muhammad really believed he was talking to a god, then he was probably mentally ill too.
So being a profit of god is mentally ill, but cutting off your penis and declaring you're a women, is totally sane. Got ya.
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
Gender reconstructive surgery helps most people who suffer from gender dysphoria. So yeah, I would say it's a sane way of dealing with an illness.
If you really hear voices and believe those voices are coming from an invisible man, you probably are mentally ill.
Gender dysphoria is a mental health condition. They are already mental, then people like you make it worse, by playing make believe, and telling them they are a women.
TexanManWithPlans
Verified User
Lol. There are not.
Do you know who Philo of Alexandria was? He was a first-century Jewish philosopher who lived during the time Jesus is alleged to have preached. He was a mystic and actively sought the Jewish Messiah. He visited Jerusalem numerous times and wrote of all sorts of events there, but his writings are strangely silent on Jesus.
Odd, isn't it? For three years, Jesus supposedly preached and did miracles all across Israel for thousands of people to witness. And, according to Matthew, on the day he was crucified, Jerusalem was invaded by the resurrected corpses of past prophets. Why didn't Philo ever write about this zombie invasion of Jerusalem? Or about the miracles that the travelling preacher performed?
TexanManWithPlans
Verified User
Muhammed probably was schizophrenic.
They believe he had Epilepsy
No it doesn't. It gives them a false belief that they can be something there's no way they can be.
Roman historian and scholar Tacitus wrote about Jesus, separate from the apostles accounts.
Most historians agree there was a historical Jesus. Weather or not he was the son of God, or a prophet, relies on faith.
Personally I am agnostic.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
Well according to all of the studies, gender reassignment surgery does help these people, whereas telling them to just deal with it only makes it worse.
But it depends how you look at things. If you don't care about facts, then you'll probably just ignore the studies and reality. Personally, I like reals over feels.
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
God.
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
Feels over reals.
God is real. He even created you as what you are not what you think you are.
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
What studies? Being anti-science to be "nice" doesn't make sense.
TexanManWithPlans
Verified User
Sorry, but no. The thing about Tacitus and other writers of the day is that they relied on what the Christians themselves had to say. Christianity was one of many sects in the Roman Empire and someone like Tacitus would have no interest in Jesus' historicity. (Btw, Tacitus and his peers also believed that Hercules was an historical figure.)
Most historians do not agree on whether that there was an historical Jesus. They can't even decide what it means to say "historical Jesus," because there were many people in those days with disciples claiming to be the Messiah. It's possible that the Jesus of Christianity is a combination of pious fable and a mosaic of multiple historical figures. When you remove all the fanciful nonsense, you're left with a vague figure who preaches vague moral concepts.
I told you once. If you can't remember, that's your fault.