Why are liberals afraid to answer this question?

Anti-Party said:
I study all parties. I knew there would be no more discussion of intellect so I went to bed. I'm glad I did because it seems the only response was "OMG you ran out of things to say about this topic, LOSER!" VERY Junior High.

I directly compromised your theory and you never responded.

You lose. Enough said.
Click to expand...

The only thing you and the other whiners have compromised, is the idea that you had a god idea to begin with.
More laws aren't going to protect anyone and the only reason liberals are clamering for this, is because it makes them FEEL good.
 
Anti-Party said:
Name which one of those is legal. We can name things all day long that are "another way" to avoid law to produce crime. The only question is do we support the fast tract to crime, or do we try problem prevention.

This isn't rocket science kiddo.
Click to expand...

If this is all about "problem prevention", then why is there no push to make all motor vehicles to be equipped with ignition lockout devices; so that drunk drivers aren't able to use the vehicular loophole, to continue to put the public at risk?
 
Anti-Party said:
I agree with you......the only thing we can do now is to stop the regulation on prison made guns. If the laws on prison made guns aren't working then why are we even trying, (R)ight?

The only thing this is doing is causing "shakedowns" on those "good' inmates. What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty, (R)ight?

It's almost like debating a 3rd grader.
Click to expand...

I never considered your debating skills as to that of a 3rd grader; but if you insist, so be it.
Now stop acting like a 8/9 year old. :)
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Got this from my facebook page.

These were made by PRISONERS, in PRISON.
IN PRISON!!

Now tell me how Expanded Background Checks are going to stop someone, who can't leagally own a firearm, from getting one? :palm:

21085_10151411334607596_2122582804_n.jpg
Click to expand...

Facebook? Sure, that's a reliable source.

Looks like your fantasies of prison life are based on tv and movies too. Just like your fantasies of teachers and students packing heat to scare off the injuns and bank robbers. Sorry, you ain't no Johnny Crawford.
 
I know you like hiding behind your 1/2 of the forced ignore; but then, you always were a coward.
And now you appear to believe that you casting aspersions on a post, means you've refuted it. :palm:
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
I have asked serveral people and some people several times, the same question; but instead of answering it, they have posted responses that have nothing to do with the question.

There are those that have been pushing for extended back ground checks; but they have yet to show how it's going to change anything.

So I decided to ask the question, in a new thread, so that it would reach more liberals then the ones I've already asked and hopefully one of them will be able to give an honest answer.

The question is:

"How are increased background checks going to stop "murderers, felons and wife beaters" from getting guns, that are already illegal for them to have?"

I anxiously await an answer.
Click to expand...

Background checks will not stop anyone who is very determined of them from getting a gun. It may throw a roadblock between them and the easiest method of obtaining the gun. In my experience as a prosecutor that criminals, insane people, and people under extreme emotional pressure sometimes are not able to accomplish things if they are just a bit more complicated, or if they fail at a first attempt. People who murder our of extreme emotion often only needed just a little more time for the emotion to pass in order to have stopped themselves from having committed the crime.

It will do nothing to stop the cold hearted, calculating murders... luckily that is a very small number of all murders.
 
Jarod said:
Background checks will not stop anyone who is very determined of them from getting a gun. It may throw a roadblock between them and the easiest method of obtaining the gun. In my experience as a prosecutor that criminals, insane people, and people under extreme emotional pressure sometimes are not able to accomplish things if they are just a bit more complicated, or if they fail at a first attempt. People who murder our of extreme emotion often only needed just a little more time for the emotion to pass in order to have stopped themselves from having committed the crime.

It will do nothing to stop the cold hearted, calculating murders... luckily that is a very small number of all murders.
Click to expand...

The majority of gun related deaths are emotionally based domestic ones. These are the ones background checks will help stop and why they're needed.
 
Anti-Party said:
I agree with you......the only thing we can do now is to stop the regulation on prison made guns. If the laws on prison made guns aren't working then why are we even trying, (R)ight?

The only thing this is doing is causing "shakedowns" on those "good' inmates. What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty, (R)ight?

It's almost like debating a 3rd grader.
Click to expand...


No...a third grader would occasionally make sense or put forth a rational argument.
 
Jarod said:
Background checks will not stop anyone who is very determined of them from getting a gun. It may throw a roadblock between them and the easiest method of obtaining the gun. In my experience as a prosecutor that criminals, insane people, and people under extreme emotional pressure sometimes are not able to accomplish things if they are just a bit more complicated, or if they fail at a first attempt. People who murder our of extreme emotion often only needed just a little more time for the emotion to pass in order to have stopped themselves from having committed the crime.

It will do nothing to stop the cold hearted, calculating murders... luckily that is a very small number of all murders.
Click to expand...

Wouldn't that work for drunk drivers also, with the requirement that all vehicles be equipped with an ignition lockout device to avoid this particular vehicular loophole?
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Wouldn't that work for drunk drivers also, with the requirement that all vehicles be equipped with an ignition lockout device to avoid this particular vehicular loophole?
Click to expand...

Im not sure I got what you are saying here. But we do have a device called a vehicle ignition interlock device that is required for recidivist DUI offenders, it requires you to blow into a tube and will only allow you to start your car after you have registered a low BAC.
 
Jarod said:
Background checks will not stop anyone who is very determined of them from getting a gun. It may throw a roadblock between them and the easiest method of obtaining the gun. In my experience as a prosecutor that criminals, insane people, and people under extreme emotional pressure sometimes are not able to accomplish things if they are just a bit more complicated, or if they fail at a first attempt. People who murder our of extreme emotion often only needed just a little more time for the emotion to pass in order to have stopped themselves from having committed the crime.

It will do nothing to stop the cold hearted, calculating murders... luckily that is a very small number of all murders.
Click to expand...


People that are determined to murder someone don't need a gun, they just need the opportunity.
 
Jarod said:
Im not sure I got what you are saying here. But we do have a device called a vehicle ignition interlock device that is required for recidivist DUI offenders, it requires you to blow into a tube and will only allow you to start your car after you have registered a low BAC.
Click to expand...

Christ jarod, hes asking why YOU don't demand that they be put on every car to prevent the drunk from driving....like you want EVERY gun owner or
buyer to be checked before they can acquire a gun......and you know the answer don't you.....?

But the point is, its just as unjust in both cases to burdon the innocent driver or gun owner trying to prevent what MIGHT be ....might.
 
NOVA said:
Christ jarod, hes asking why YOU don't demand that they be put on every car to prevent the drunk from driving....like you want EVERY gun owner or
buyer to be checked before they can acquire a gun......and you know the answer don't you.....?

But the point is, its just as unjust in both cases to burdon the innocent driver or gun owner trying to prevent what MIGHT be ....might.
Click to expand...

People have demanded that. The reason I don't demand it is because I have not seen any drunk drivers plow into a school killing thirty some odd kids.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
I know you like hiding behind your 1/2 of the forced ignore; but then, you always were a coward. :palm:
Click to expand...


Nice to see you finally admitting the real reason you ignore me is that you're a coward...just as we thought.


USF...hiding behind his little computer screen, too askeered to even respond to my points...ROTFLMAO!
 
Jarod said:
Im not sure I got what you are saying here. But we do have a device called a vehicle ignition interlock device that is required for recidivist DUI offenders, it requires you to blow into a tube and will only allow you to start your car after you have registered a low BAC.
Click to expand...
But why not require all cars to be equipped in anticipation of someone, who is already resticted, using someone else's car, buy a different car, or even stealing a car.
This loophole needs to be closed.
 
Jarod said:
People have demanded that. The reason I don't demand it is because I have not seen any drunk drivers plow into a school killing thirty some odd kids.
Click to expand...

So you're not really worried about children dying; you're worried about the schools and the resulting numbers.

GOOD

Because more people die from DUI accidents, every year, then die from firearms; in the US.


School bus driver who plowed into home was drunk


4 dead, 8 injured after suspected drunk driver plows into bus stop in Vegas

Carrollton, Kentucky – May 1988
This bus crash is often called the worst drunk driving accident in United States history. A pickup truck driven by an intoxicated man crashed into a school bus carrying sixty-seven people. Twenty-seven children and teenagers were killed and thirty-four were injured.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top