Here's how your posts read asshat:
I understand, poopiehead. Reading is hard for you. Try moving your lips as you sound out the words. It sometimes helps those with difficulties.
Here's how your posts read asshat:
In Cali now you can get $20 an hour for saying "Do you want fries with that?"
They have gone full insane in that state. I left it at the right time.
ROFLMAO.
Quick. Pick up those goal posts and move them before anyone notices.
Ignoring the fact that you will have to move them again when I point out that you have no evidence that the 366,000 jobs are mostly low income.
Just stating facts about so called job gains
Where is this coming from?
The alt right realizes they will never have a majority, so are desperate for a system that does not require a majority. One of their major terrorist groups is the Three Percenters, who believe they can rule the USA with just three percent of the population supporting them. Basically, they want to enslave 97% of the population.
The "three percenters" are a perfect example of the US Constitution's dreadful inadequacy.
Instead of using militias as the excuse to protect private ownership of firearms--
something that could have been done infinitely more artfully than it was--
the US Constitution should have simply banned all private militias of any kind, paid or unpaid,
No. You weren't stating facts since over 300,000 of the jobs were not in food service.
No. You weren't stating facts since over 300,000 of the jobs were not in food service.
In fairness to the Constitution, at the time all private militias were banned. It was considered treason to have a militia not authorized by the state.
The alt right realizes they will never have a majority, so are desperate for a system that does not require a majority. One of their major terrorist groups is the Three Percenters, who believe they can rule the USA with just three percent of the population supporting them. Basically, they want to enslave 97% of the population.
What 'three percenters'? What is the 'three percenters'?The "three percenters" are a perfect example of the US Constitution's dreadful inadequacy.
Militias are not required to own firearms.Instead of using militias as the excuse to protect private ownership of firearms--
Art????something that could have been done infinitely more artfully than it was--
So, no armed security force, eh? You planning a crime?the US Constitution should have simply banned all private militias of any kind, paid or unpaid,
A business has the right to hire armed security, dumbass.and the right to assemble should have specifically excluded the rights for such groups to assemble.
You alraedy have. You utterly discard the Constitution of the Unites States and all State constitutions.That's the obvious part but I personally would have gone much further.
The Constitution is not there to prevent you from being offended.I would have also banned stupid caps, flannel shirts, pickup trucks not owned by a registered business, scraggly beards,
annoying bumper stickers, too many flags, offensively bad grammar, country music, white wooden churches, NASCAR, beer in cans, and much more.
Since your view is not civilized, you must ban yourself. It is YOU wanting to ban the Constitution and implement dictatorship by you.I invite other civilized persons on JPP to add to this list,
but participation by the uninvited would not be too surprising.
In fairness to the Constitution, at the time all private militias were banned. It was considered treason to have a militia not authorized by the state.
militia just means men of fighting age.
Nope. A militia is an organization of military character. It has always meant that since the word first appeared in the English lexicon. A militia is ORGANIZED. Civilians are NOT military.
wrong again, totalitarian dipshit.
militia just means men of fighting age.
wrong again, totalitarian dipshit.
The fact that you don't know what 'militia' or 'totalitarian' or 'fascism' means is not my problem. It's YOURS.