Why Does the Global Warming Faith Claim to be Science?

[Into the Night]

Why do you think anyone believes you know the first foreign thing about this?

RQAA.

 

[Into the Night]

So you can't.

Argument of the Stone fallacy.

You grabbed a gloss of the concept but you didn't explain it. How does it work? How do you measure sea water alkalinity?

Alkalinity is not a chemical.

What are the various reactions going on with regards to CO2 dissolved in the water?

CO2 dissolves in water, then gasses off again. That's about it. It's an equilibrium reaction.

I knew you were all hat and no cattle.

Thanks for the confirmation.

Cliche fallacy. Assumption of victory fallacy.

 

[anonymoose]

There is no such thing as a global climate.

That’s why I said broadly.

Earth has many climates.

Of course.

Climate cannot change...ever.

So you’re arguing that France , e.g., had the same climate 20,000 years ago when it was covered by the Scandinavian Ice Sheet? How is that possible?

 

[Into the Night]

LOL. No you didn't. You waved your hands around. You didn't explain it.

Waving hands around does not result in typing.

LOL. Whatever you need to justify to whatever audience you think you are reaching.

He doesn't need to justify anything. The theories of science that you deny exist. They speak for themselves.

But for those of us who actually ARE scientists it's pretty obvious you aren't.

You are not a scientist. You deny theories of science.

But do keep trying. It's kinda sweetly hilarious. Like watching a toddler with daddy's shoes on playing adult.

Mantra 1a. Lame.

 

[Into the Night]

Neither IBDaMann or Into the Night have any understanding of how Climate Change

Climate cannot change.

is believed to work.

Climate is not work.

There's no point in discussing/debating with uneducated, dishonest conspiracy theorists.

The Church of Global Warming is a conspiracy. It is no theory.

 

[anonymoose]

What is the answer when pointing to where there is no life?

What region has no life?

This gets into semantic technicalities.

Not really

Regional environments have changed.

What caused them to change?

I claim that no environment's climate ever changed while the environment remained the same.

Agreed.

If you then claim that I am merely quibbling and playing "semantics",

Stop there.
I’m not.
.

, then I point out that you are trying to hijack the word "environment" and I return to demanding that you unambiguously define "climate" ... and that forces any leftist to abandon the effort or acknowledge that there is no such thing as a global climate.

?

 

[Into the Night]

That’s why I said broadly.

There is no 'broadly'. There is simply no such thing as a global climate.

So you’re arguing that France , e.g., had the same climate 20,000 years ago when it was covered by the Scandinavian Ice Sheet? How is that possible?

Climate has no location or age.

 

[anonymoose]

There is no 'broadly'. There is simply no such thing as a global climate.

I could broadly say with a high degree of certainty that Jupiter's climate doesn’t support any life yet there is life in every region of earth… including Antarctica.
So you’re saying there’s no such thing as ‘climate’.

Climate has no location.

And now you argue that Central America has the same climate as Fairbanks, Alaska.
So you consider the Köppen climate classification system to be bogus?

or age

Agreed. It is only in the present. But only if you agree that climate exists.

 

[Into the Night]

I could broadly say with a high degree of certainty that Jupiter's climate

There is no such thing as a global climate.

doesn’t support any life yet there is life in every region of earth… including Antarctica.

Many parts of Antarctica are devoid of life. It's a pretty big continent, you know.

So you’re saying there’s no such thing as ‘climate’.

There is such a thing as 'climate'. Earth has many climates.

And now you argue that Central America has the same climate as Fairbanks, Alaska.

Climate has no location.

So you consider the Köppen climate classification system to be bogus?

Climate has no location.

Agreed. It is only in the present. But only if you agree that climate exists.

Climate has no age and has no location.
Climate exists.

 

[Diogenes]

Science doesn't revolve around an imaginary consensus of experts.

Science is a process whereby hypotheses are constantly being tested against data.

If you think nobody can question "the science", it’s not science that you are championing; it is a belief system that you "worship".

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Science doesn't revolve around an imaginary consensus of experts.

Science is a process whereby hypotheses are constantly being tested against data.

If you think nobody can question "the science", it’s not science that you are championing; it is a belief system that you "worship".

It's not the system they worship, it's the outcomes. Like predestination in other religions, the Church of Gorebal Warming believes the planet is doomed because of rising CO2 which is entirely caused by mankind's activities. They demand the human race bow down and do penance for their sins (creating CO2). That, and large cash donations to their church, of course...

 

[Into the Night]

Science doesn't revolve around an imaginary consensus of experts.

This part is correct.

Science is a process whereby hypotheses are constantly being tested against data.

Wrong. Science is a set of falsifiable theories. A hypothesis stems from a theory, not the other way around. Example: the null hypothesis of a theory.

If you think nobody can question "the science", it’s not science that you are championing; it is a belief system that you "worship".

Science is not a religion. It is a set of falsifiable theories. You cannot just ignore them.

 

[Into the Night]

It's not the system they worship, it's the outcomes.

What 'outcomes'??

Like predestination in other religions, the Church of Gorebal Warming believes the planet is doomed because of rising CO2 which is entirely caused by mankind's activities.

This part is correct.

They demand the human race bow down and do penance for their sins (creating CO2). That, and large cash donations to their church, of course...

The trouble is, you are ALSO a believer in the Church of Global Warming.