Why I doubt the election results

[Into the Night]

Nobody has yet given me one place that had more votes than registered voters. I found one precinct with 4 registered voters and 5 votes which was due to a provisional ballot.

They just repeat the claims they have heard without ever doing any research on their own.

RQAA

 

[Into the Night]

One of them tells the lie, it is repeated and amplified by Breitbart, gatewaypundit, OAN, etc. and becomes 'TRUTH'. They always whine that the MSM doesn't pick up on their claims. There is a simple explanation. Those claims wouldn't survive the first minute of a vetting process at any reputable news site. The irony is delicious. The only Fake news out there is from the right. Because journalists actually have standards. The cult has none. They will lie, cheat, mislead, make up 'alternate facts', whatever it takes to prop up Dear Leader. It's sad.

Journalists have standards???? HAHAHAHAHAHYAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

 

[archives]

Trump never filed 60 court cases. Courts not hearing a case is not a proof. You can't win what never took place. Election fraud is not an election.

At Trump's request, the Justice Dept made an unprecedent move, and upon Billy Barr's orders were instructed to investigate any rumors of election fraud that they came across, and we all know what conclusion Billy Barr offered based upon these inquiries

 

[Into the Night]

Vote harvesting does not exist. Rightys are so desperate.

You are still locked in paradox. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox. You are being irrational.

 

[Into the Night]

At Trump's request, the Justice Dept made an unprecedent move, and upon Billy Barr's orders were instructed to investigate any rumors of election fraud that they came across, and we all know what conclusion Billy Barr offered based upon these inquiries

False authority fallacy. Argument of ignorance fallacy. Denial of history.

 

[archives]

DEMOCRATS disenfranchised voters by committing massive election fraud. It is YOU being the hypocrite here. You don't get to 'dismiss' anyone. You are not the king.

That ain't any kind of fallacy, it is just flat out wrong

 

[archives]

False authority fallacy. Argument of ignorance fallacy. Denial of history.

Oh, got it, now the Justice Dept is full of shit, Billy Barr, Trump's own fixer, isn't a credible investigator, right, let me ask you, you do you have any recognized source that offers verifiable proof that invalidates Billy Barr's conclusions?

 

[Legion]

That ain't any kind of fallacy, it is just flat out wrong

Is that a fact, Anchovies?

 

[Legion]

Oh, got it, now the Justice Dept is full of shit, Billy Barr, Trump's own fixer, isn't a credible investigator, right, let me ask you, you do you have any recognized source that offers verifiable proof that invalidates Billy Barr's conclusions?

By "recognized", you mean one you like because it feeds your confirmation bias.

Poor Anchovies.

 

[archives]

By "recognized", you mean one you like because it feeds your confirmation bias.

Poor Anchovies.

Hardly, rather one equal in credibility to the Justice Dept, or if you like Billy Barr, hey, he is your man, even he said there wasn't any substantial fraud involved, and you know based on his track record he would have loved to find anything

 

[Legion]

Hardly, rather one equal in credibility to the Justice Dept, or if you like Billy Barr, hey, he is your man, even he said there wasn't any substantial fraud involved, and you know based on his track record he would have loved to find anything

Barr's opinion is worth as much as your is, Anchovies.

 

[archives]

Barr's opinion is worth as much as your is, Anchovies.

Wasn't only Barr, and it is humorous to see a Trumpkin as yourself dissing the same guy who you certainly appraised as authoritative the last few years, but what Barr concluded based upon the inquires of his field offices

 

[Legion]

Wasn't only Barr, and it is humorous to see a Trumpkin as yourself dissing the same guy who you certainly appraised as authoritative the last few years

Did I?

 

[archives]

Did I?

Funny

Next

 

[Legion]

Funny Next

So, as I suspected, you have no evidence that I supposedly "certainly appraised as authoritative the last few years".

Poor Anchovies.

 

[Flash]

RQAA.

RQAA

RQAA

RQAA

In other words, you have no clue about any jurisdiction that reported more votes than registered voters. You are good about making false allegations but terrible about supporting any of them by avoiding any information.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Two dead people voting is too many, but you are more than happy to disenfranchise millions of voters. Spare me the hypocrisy. You are dismissed.

How am I "disenfranchis(ing) millions of voters?" By requiring ID to vote? By making them take a small amount of time to show up and do it? Exactly how am I advocating this?

I think it's far, far more important that voting be honest and verified than made simple. Or, do you believe people are just too stupid and lazy to get an ID and show up to vote on election day?

Or, do you think that a weak voting system without any requirements for identification, voting for months on end into an election, allowing anyone to handle ballots, never purging or updating voter roles, and the like is all going to improve the integrity of our elections? After all, the most important aspect of any election is that the voters have certainty and belief that the election was fair and honest, not rife with fraud. It doesn't matter if fraud was present or not. What matters is that people have faith in the veracity of the system. Right now, over half the country is starting to question or doesn't have faith in the election process today. That is a major and growing problem.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Vote harvesting does not exist. Rightys are so desperate.

Most states have laws permitting someone besides a voter to return the voter's mail ballot. These laws vary by state. Mail ballots take the form of absentee ballots and ballots cast in vote-by-mail states.

https://ballotpedia.org/Ballot_harvesting_(ballot_collection)_laws_by_state

Although ballot harvesting is legal in some states, it is illegal in others. However, some of the same tactics are used both in states where ballot harvesting is legal and where it is illegal.

This leads ballot harvesting to generate controversy, praise, and criticism from people across the political spectrum. Some practices that are uniformly illegal across the nation include:

Filling out a ballot for another voter
Intimidating a voter into voting for or against a candidate
Influence a voter's decision
In practice, ballot harvesting does tend to increase the number of votes tallied within a given election without much controversy. However, voting laws vary significantly from state to state, and small differences in voting law can significantly impact an election.

https://www.findlaw.com/voting/how-...arvesting--what-is-it--how-does-it-work-.html

So, either you are oblivious, stupid, or willfully ignorant.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

He's locked in paradox. He's being irrational. It is not possible to argue both sides of a paradox.

What "paradox?" The dead did vote. Doesn't matter the extent to which this happened. It shouldn't happen at all. If voting is so important shouldn't the voter roles be maintained as accurately as possible with the dead removed, a requirement to maintain a correct current address, etc.?

 

[Flash]

RQAA

RQAA: definition: "I've got nothing"