Why is Georgia changing the election rules?

Kamala Trump said:
for every vote deemed illegal someone cries "voter disenfranchised".

sit down and shut up.

elections are often challenged.

quit acting like a fucking idiotic bitch.
Click to expand...
There are valid reasons to declare a vote to be illegal. The state making a mistake is not a reason to nullify a vote.
 
Kamala Trump said:
I disagree.

unconstituional election rule changes is reason enough.
Click to expand...
So, again, as a voter ALL you can do is follow the rules and procedures provided to you by the state. The state is the ONLY entity that is able to set voting rules and procedures. You want hundreds of thousands of votes cast by legally registered voters, using legitimate state-provided ballots and following rules provided by the state, to have their vote nullified because the state screwed up?

Let's say a city changed the speed limit on a specific road. They raised the speed from 35 to 45. Two months later the courts say "Nope. You didn't follow the proper procedures to get the speed limit change, so the speed signs need to be changed back to 35 until the proper process is followed".

In your world, the state could retroactively write tickets for speeding for EVERYONE who was obeying the 45mph speed limit signs, even though drivers were only following rules/laws put in place by the state.
 
ZenMode said:
You want hundreds of thousands of votes cast by legally registered voters, using legitimate state-provided ballots and following rules provided by the state, to have their vote nullified because the state screwed up?
Click to expand...
yes.

fucking up elections can have direct consequences.

this is what having rules and a constitution means.

eat poop.
 
ZenMode said:
So, again, as a voter ALL you can do is follow the rules and procedures provided to you by the state. The state is the ONLY entity that is able to set voting rules and procedures. You want hundreds of thousands of votes cast by legally registered voters, using legitimate state-provided ballots and following rules provided by the state, to have their vote nullified because the state screwed up?

Let's say a city changed the speed limit on a specific road. They raised the speed from 35 to 45. Two months later the courts say "Nope. You didn't follow the proper procedures to get the speed limit change, so the speed signs need to be changed back to 35 until the proper process is followed".

In your world, the state could retroactively write tickets for speeding for EVERYONE who was obeying the 45mph speed limit signs, even though drivers were only following rules/laws put in place by the state.
Click to expand...
your speed limit example is dogshit retarded, btw.

:tardthoughts:
 
Kamala Trump said:
your speed limit example is dogshit retarded, btw.

:tardthoughts:
Click to expand...
My speed limit example is spot on. The state sets the rules for driving and the state sets the rules for voting. All the citizens of a state can do is follow the rules provided to them by the state.

Punishing people, who are only following the rules provided them by the state, is what is retarded.
 
ZenMode said:
My speed limit example is spot on. The state sets the rules for driving and the state sets the rules for voting. All the citizens of a state can do is follow the rules provided to them by the state.

Punishing people, who are only following the rules provided them by the state, is what is retarded.
Click to expand...
no it isn't.

the process for setting state rules is constitutionally controlled; the legislature must vote.

your analogy = just anal.
 
It's time for Biden to use some of those virtually unlimited powers afforded him by Trump's hand-picked SCOTUS.

He should have federal troops monitor the polling in all regions suspected of Republican chicanery.
Then he should send six SCOTUS justices to Guantanamo.
Then he should send Trump with them.
And then, perhaps, a selection of our JPP right wing lunatics.

We're not talking this seriously enough.
If the Democrats don't win not only the White House
but both chambers of Congress as well,
the United States of America are the Fourth Reich....period.
We're potentially looking at the end.
No hyperbole. Gruesome fact.

It's as simple as that.
There are no rules in effect in a fight for survival. None whatsoever.
It's now "anything goes" time.
The Democrats must act now when they have the newly increased power of the Executive Branch
 
NiftyNiblick said:
It's time for Biden to use some of those virtually unlimited powers afforded him by Trump's hand-picked SCOTUS.

He should have federal troops monitor the polling in all regions suspected of Republican chicanery.
Then he should send six SCOTUS justices to Guantanamo.
Then he should send Trump with them.
And then, perhaps, a selection of our JPP right wing lunatics.

We're not talking this seriously enough.
If the Democrats don't win not only the White House
but both chambers of Congress as well,
the United States of America are the Fourth Reich....period.
We're potentially looking at the end.
No hyperbole. Gruesome fact.

It's as simple as that.
There are no rules in effect in a fight for survival. None whatsoever.
It's now "anything goes" time.
The Democrats must act now when they have the newly increased power of the Executive Branch
Click to expand...
you're forgetting one thing.

trump has the support of deep state now.
 
Kamala Trump said:
no it isn't.

the process for setting state rules is constitutionally controlled; the legislature must vote.

your analogy = just anal.
Click to expand...
I understand that the rules are set by the legislature. Again, you would not retroactively ticket people for speeding because the state screwed up. Why would you retroactively punish people who only followed the voting rules put forth by the state?
 
ZenMode said:
I understand that the rules are set by the legislature. Again, you would not retroactively ticket people for speeding because the state screwed up. Why would you retroactively punish people who only followed the voting rules put forth by the state?
Click to expand...
if the rules were screwed up enough, yes I would expect the questionable results be set aside.

why have a certification process if you would never set results aside?
 
Kamala Trump said:
if the rules were screwed up enough, yes I would expect the questionable results be set aside.

why have a certification process if you would never set results aside?
Click to expand...
The rules change nothing about the number of fraudulent votes. Every single ballot that was put into an "illegal" drop box in WI may have been legit.

It's bullshit like this that has people coming out in huge numbers to vote oppose MAGA. You don't give a shit about democracy or the importance of the voice of the people being heard.

Truly appalling that you can be so incredibly short-sighted and indifferent regarding what is right and wrong.
 
Kamala Trump said:
if the rules were screwed up enough, yes I would expect the questionable results be set aside.

why have a certification process if you would never set results aside?
Click to expand...
"Questionable result"? Either ballots are legit or fraudulent. You throw out FRAUDULENT ballots, not legit ballots that are submitted in accordance with the rules put forth by the state.
 
ZenMode said:
"Questionable result"? Either ballots are legit or fraudulent. You throw out FRAUDULENT ballots, not legit ballots that are submitted in accordance with the rules put forth by the state.
Click to expand...
wrong.

if the rules put forth by the state are unconstitutional a whole election may go uncertified.

the certification process exists for a reason.

it's not a rubber stamp.
 
ZenMode said:
The rules change nothing about the number of fraudulent votes. Every single ballot that was put into an "illegal" drop box in WI may have been legit.

It's bullshit like this that has people coming out in huge numbers to vote oppose MAGA. You don't give a shit about democracy or the importance of the voice of the people being heard.

Truly appalling that you can be so incredibly short-sighted and indifferent regarding what is right and wrong.
Click to expand...
it depends on the nature of the rule change.

you're proving to be quite the imbecile today.

why so dumb?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top