ZenMode
Well-known member
Second time... I'm blaming Trump for his actions.DON'T TRY TO BLAME DEMOCRAT ELECTION FRAUD ON TRUMP!
Second time... I'm blaming Trump for his actions.DON'T TRY TO BLAME DEMOCRAT ELECTION FRAUD ON TRUMP!
Stop ignoring my questions intentionally.RQAA. Stop repeating your question mindlessly.
Again....if Trump had his way, he would have nullified votes cast by legally registered voters, using official state approved ballots, who were following the rules for voting provided them by the state.no.
there are more criteria to legality than a small mind such as yours can fathom.
remember bush v. gore?Some actions by the states were determined, by the courts, to be in violation of the state legislatures rules and other changes were deemed to not be illegal.
But, again, Trump and his lawyers attempted to use the courts to nullify enough votes to make him the winner of the election. Think about that. The president of the United States is using his personal lawyers to try to nullify votes so he can win the election. That is the kind of person you all are supporting.
if trump had his way?Again....if Trump had his way, he would have nullified votes cast by legally registered voters, using official state approved ballots, who were following the rules for voting provided them by the state.
That was Trump's intention with his 90+ lawsuits. He was trying to say "The dropboxes used in Wisconsin were illegal under state law, SO, all of the ballots put in this boxes shouldn't count.
THAT is the kind of person you support.
it does when it's funded by hilary and used as a premise for a banana republic style state political persecution campaign against a duly elected president and the investigating authority KNEW IT WAS FAKE.
fuck off with your lies and evil.
This is why you're losing.
is there any cause under which an election should not be certified?Again....if Trump had his way, he would have nullified votes cast by legally registered voters, using official state approved ballots, who were following the rules for voting provided them by the state.
That was Trump's intention with his 90+ lawsuits. He was trying to say "The dropboxes used in Wisconsin were illegal under state law, SO, all of the ballots put in this boxes shouldn't count.
THAT is the kind of person you support.
remember bush v. gore?
hanging chads?
nobody considered that a threat to democracy.
now sit down and stfu.
Trump was trying to nullify hundreds of thousands, if not millions, a votes. That is significantly different than raising a question about a very small number of ballots that had hanging chads.remember bush v. gore?
hanging chads?
nobody considered that a threat to democracy.
now sit down and stfu.
Yes, if Trump had his way... He filed all of those lawsuits specifically to get votes nullified. That was what he wanted to happen so that he could win the election.if trump had his way?
lapsing into your fantasies projected on trump is poor argumentation.
dumbass
but everyone submits to the legal system.Yes, if Trump had his way... He filed all of those lawsuits specifically to get votes nullified. That was what he wanted to happen so that he could win the election.
is there any cause under which an election should not be certified?
if not, is the certification process vestigial and dumb?
and if so, why have rules?
that's how election challenging works.[
Again, this wasn't a matter of not certifying the election. This was a matter of Trump trying to use the courts to nullify votes so that he could win states he otherwise would not have won.
Gore wasn't trying to nullify hundreds of thousands of votes. The election was incredibly close and, unfortunately, each recount came back a little bit different. The question of hanging Chad's was a question of what constitutes a vote being made by someone. It was a very, very small number. In Trump's situation, there was no question on who people intended to vote for. Trump just wanted to wipe enough Democrats votes so he could win.but everyone submits to the legal system.
if gore had his way......
you're a fucking idiot right now.
yes he was.Gore wasn't trying to nullify hundreds of thousands of votes. The election was incredibly close and, unfortunately, each recount came back a little bit different. The question of hanging Chad's was a question of what constitutes a vote being made by someone. It was a very, very small number. In Trump's situation, there was no question on who people intended to vote for. Trump just wanted to wipe enough Democrats votes so he could win.
Nullifying the votes of people, who have done nothing wrong or illegal, absolutely is not how challenging elections works. If Trump had one and it was Biden's people trying to nullify Republican votes, you would be losing your fucking shit.. And rightfully so.that's how election challenging works.
election challenging is a legal concept, fucktard.
No he wasn't. That is a flat out lie.yes he was.
oh really?No he wasn't. That is a flat out lie.
but everyone submits to the legal system.
if gore had his way......
you're a fucking idiot right now.
for every vote deemed illegal someone cries "voter disenfranchised".Nullifying the votes of people, who have done nothing wrong or illegal, absolutely is not how challenging elections works. If Trump had one and it was Biden's people trying to nullify Republican votes, you would be losing your fucking shit.. And rightfully so.