Why Most Republicans Don’t Like Higher Education

Hello Flash,

They voted for President Obama, but Republicans did everything in their power to prevent success and/or a flourishing middle class.

All of this was going on before, during and after. President Obama decided to go after healthcare, which caused a huge resistance. It is not his fault that Republicans, through their resistance, empowered the big corporations and super-rich, further eroding the middle class.

President Obama, lacking the support of Republicans unwilling to stand up to big money and big power in the name of the people, was forced to make a deal with the insurance industry and big pharma. Yes, President Obama stepped squarely on the third rail of politics and survived, but the cost was steep.

None of this means that Republicans have done a good job. Quite the contrary. They couldn't fix healthcare or the debt problem. They have only made these things worse. Coal workers and factory workers are still being laid off, student debt is soaring, and most of the nation is living precariously paycheck to paycheck. Wealth inequality is more extreme than ever and the deficit is out of control, rapidly approaching a trillion dollars. We can't reduce taxes so low that the revenue is a trillion below expenses for long without causing a debt recession. Better pull out of the market now or there may not be time when the crash happens.

But if you feel secure with the way things are going just leave it all in and let it ride. If you've got plenty of time it will come back some day.

My main point was that when the working class was voting "in their own interests" (for Democrats) all those years their well-being actually deteriorated. You are blaming it all on Republicans but that doesn't change the fact that it was still happening--so voting in their own interests did not seem to be in their interest.

It started long before Obama according to the posters taking that viewpoint and said the decline started in the 1970's.

The whole "shrinking middle class" argument is misleading. The middle class has declined (based on how it is measured) but it is because more people moved into higher income groups, not lower income. [IRS].
 
You find it under bushes? Property, essentially, is theft. You're not free because you spend your life thinking about money, and other people are not free because you people stop them having any. Obvious enough, surely?

Other people would be free if Dark Soul gave them some of his? Isn't that also theft?
 
I haven't the faintest idea. What have they got to do with education?

You brought up the topic of why people attend universities--"those who attend institutions of higher education do so only to make more money afterwards,"

Why did those celebrities want their kids to attend?
 
One of the wealthiest guys I know is a landscaper. He just built a huge house about 1/2 mile down a unpaved road in our resort town, then had the road paved so he wouldnt get his cars dirty.

A contractor that I know in the Appalachians, great skier, travels to his house in Argentina every summer to have his kids ski (train) year 'round. He met his wife there (their mother). She looks like a former super model.

My pool guy winters in South America for four months of the year.

Guys like domer-nomad have no concept- too busy rubbing each other's butts and pole smoking.

The guy who owned the lawn care business I worked in HS for spent 3 months every winter in Florida. He couldn't read, his wife did all the paperwork. They eventually retired and moved there.
 
They voted for President Obama, but Republicans did everything in their power to prevent success and/or a flourishing middle class.

They voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012. In 2016 about 8-9 million of those who voted for Obama voted for Trump. Telling them it was in their interest to vote Democratic while at the same time telling them their economic position was declining only works for so long. Eventually they try something different.
 
Hello gfm7175,

There is no such thing as "free" college.

NOTHING is "free" in life... It always costs somebody something...

When we refer to free college in political discussions it is generally assumed that we are speaking of tuition being paid by the government, mostly out of taxpayer revenues. It is actually free to the students. This alleviates the burden of being saddled with crushing debt at a time when young people are starting jobs and families and trying to save for a down payment on a home. They pay it back by paying their taxes during their lifetime of work. If a college degree allows them to earn more money, they pay more into the system during their lifetime than it cost the system to put them through college. Thus, it is actually a benefit to both society and the economy, or GDP.
 
Hello gfm7175,

When we refer to free college in political discussions it is generally assumed that we are speaking of tuition being paid by the government, mostly out of taxpayer revenues.
Students are not taxpayers?? Also, why should taxpayers pay for a service for their whole lives even though they only receive that service for a few years of their lives?? Why should I pay for someone else's education??

It is actually free to the students.
No, it is not. THEY are paying for it, like you yourself just stated above, through their taxpayer dollars. They will continue to pay for it for their whole lives, instead of just for the few years they are in school, or for however long they have their loan... So no, it is anything BUT "free"... Tacking the name "free" on something does NOT make it free... Maybe it's free for people who don't pay any taxes, but for everyone else, it is anything BUT free...

This alleviates the burden of being saddled with crushing debt at a time when young people are starting jobs and families and trying to save for a down payment on a home.
No, it doesn't. It just spreads that same burden out throughout a taxpayer's lifetime to make it less noticeable to the ignorant taxpayer (and likely would even INCREASE the total amount of burden, since it would be for a lifetime as opposed to X number of years).

For example, (and I'm using random numbers here to illustrate a point), $20,000 instantly, or $6,000/year for four years would both be less of an overall burden on someone than $50/month over 60 years...

They pay it back by paying their taxes during their lifetime of work.
Ummmm, I thought you just said that it was free for the students?? Now they're paying it back during their whole lifetime?? Which one is it?? You're locked in paradox here...

So, essentially, you are proposing sneaking yet ANOTHER tax into our paychecks, further reducing our take-home pay, and that's supposed to HELP us somehow? I'm confused... What about the people who already paid for their college schooling out of their own pockets?? Are they supposed to now pay for other people's college schooling also??

If a college degree allows them to earn more money,
Depends upon the degree...

they pay more into the system during their lifetime than it cost the system to put them through college. Thus, it is actually a benefit to both society and the economy, or GDP.
Isn't paying much more than necessary for something hurting the person paying for it? Socialism is theft; it does not create any wealth. It only destroys it. Capitalism is what creates wealth.
 
67 comes before 69, so you back it up. I'll understand if you can't lol.

Which IRS agent did you talk to about my taxes, bitch? You made the claim, cunt. I’d like to follow up on that.

Oh, wait. I won’t have to, will I, taintlicker? That’s because you’re a fucking liar. :rofl2:
 
Because you're obviously too stupid to make a decent living, dickhead.


:lolup:

I’m loving my LIFETIME PENSION right now, cunt. Get it? LIFETIME. There’s not a fucking chance my income runs dry for the rest of my life. Regardless of the market. Toss in the additional 401k and the spouse’s 401k and I have no worries for the rest of my life.

Read it and weep, bitch.
 
Back
Top