Woodward's revelations raise disturbing questions about Trump

Would you say the NYT has a liberal slant to it? Be honest.

The truth has a liberal slant. the NYT has the right and conservatives covered. David brooks is an example of right-wing columnists on the NY. times covers all sides. Problem is rump is so incompetent that the news is unfriendly for him.
 
The truth has a liberal slant. the NYT has the right and conservatives covered. David brooks is an example of right-wing columnists on the NY. times covers all sides. Problem is rump is so incompetent that the news is unfriendly for him.

Moose did not ask me...but I agree with you on this issue.

The NY Times does seem to have a "liberal slant" to it...when viewed by American rightists, mostly because it publishes the truth...often with compassion and concern for humanity...which are traits associated with "liberalism" and which are often considered inappropriate by American conservatives.

The Times truly is a FAIR AND BALANCED news source...as opposed to the extremely biased pretenders to that state of affairs.
 
The truth has a liberal slant.
And there you have it. The truth has zero slant. Just the facts.
the NYT has the right and conservatives covered.
I don't watch Fox anymore since O'reilly left but he always had the left covered and sometimes was critical of standard right wing ideology. Do you think Fox is slanted? I do.
David brooks is an example of right-wing columnists on the NY. times covers all sides.
He's a commentator, not news. Commentators are expected to have opinions.
Problem is rump is so incompetent that the news is unfriendly for him.
I think it's more because of his personality.
 
And there you have it. The truth has zero slant. Just the facts. I don't watch Fox anymore since O'reilly left but he always had the left covered and sometimes was critical of standard right wing ideology. Do you think Fox is slanted? I do. He's a commentator, not news. Commentators are expected to have opinions. I think it's more because of his personality.

You think wrong. trump is out of his field, which is money laundering. Columnists with a right-wing slant are still right wing. they are given a platform by the NY. times the NY times reports the news and events of the day. trump is a terrible person and a worse president. Reporting cannot be friendly to him. facts are what trump hates.

Fox is deliberately right wing slanted. they are not news , but a propaganda arm of the right. It was created for that purpose.
 
You think wrong. trump is out of his field, which is money laundering. Columnists with a right-wing slant are still right wing. they are given a platform by the NY. times the NY times reports the news and events of the day. trump is a terrible person and a worse president. Reporting cannot be friendly to him. facts are what trump hates.

Fox is deliberately right wing slanted. they are not news , but a propaganda arm of the right. It was created for that purpose.

Right on the button, Nordberg.

Right on the button!
 
Would you say the NYT has a liberal slant to it? Be honest.

Show me a group of folks without bias and I'll show you a "fair and balanced" news media. There's no such animal! Watch and listen everywhere and decide according to your own biases, that's your only option. Stop expecting honest and unbiased news, you're dealing with corrupted and misguided humanity. Humans are the stupidest, evil and most corrupt animals on the face of the earth. Just look at their ignorant and evil wars and never ending hatred for other humans for every stupid reason that can be contrived by idiots.
 
Back
Top