Woodward's revelations raise disturbing questions about Trump

The NY Times does not write "tabloid type stuff."

It reports the news.

Most of the material that you are finding "tabloid"...is news that MUST be reported. The safety of our Republic depends on the people realizing just how disgusting this administration is.

Can you imagine if Bannon was still in there as one of Trumpty-Dumpty's most trusted advisers?
 
When a journalist or paper (NYT) writes tabloid type stuff using "anonymous sources" it really discredits their material.
They're basically saying, "you should believe me just because I say you should". Poor journalism at best.

Would you sooner believe Trump ? Come ON!
 
Washington (CNN)Bob Woodward's charges that top national security staff find themselves compelled to protect the world from President Donald Trump should, in any normal time, precipitate an almost unprecedented national emergency.

The revelations, in the veteran reporter's new book, are so stark and shocking because they flesh out a narrative that the President's critics have long advanced -- that he is simply not fit, by intellect, temperament and knowledge, to be the most powerful man in the world.
For any other President, such charges would trigger a national debate, action from within the administration to address the national crisis and perhaps hearings on Capitol Hill, even compered by the President's Republican allies. Certainly, any conventional commander in chief would be pitched into an immediate political crisis and might see his approval ratings splinter

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/05/politics/donald-trump-bob-woodward-fear/index.html

"BULLSHIT IS THE MOTHER OF ANONYMOUS!" anonymous is Woodward's mother.

Oh how I long for the day when Democrats actually present "EVIDENCE" of something!
 
"BULLSHIT IS THE MOTHER OF ANONYMOUS!" anonymous is Woodward's mother.

Oh how I long for the day when Democrats actually present "EVIDENCE" of something!

Its not the Democrats you should be asking but the republicans in Trump White House who are undermining him.
 
Its not the Democrats you should be asking but the republicans in Trump White House who are undermining him.

I need actual EVIDENCE that somebody aside from the leftist press and Rod Rosenstein and Bob Muller are trying to undermine him. The only evidence I see otherwise is a desperate leftist media inventing "AONYMOUS" BULLSHIT.
 
I need actual EVIDENCE that somebody aside from the leftist press and Rod Rosenstein and Bob Muller are trying to undermine him. The only evidence I see otherwise is a desperate leftist media inventing "AONYMOUS" BULLSHIT.

Just who the fuck are you to demand evidence of anything? You will get what you deserve- absolutely nothing. I can guarantee that if every piece of "evidence" is presented you wouldn't believe it anyway, so just go fuck yourself, my dear.
 
That is your right...for now, Moose.

It is a fragile right, though. A relatively small group of people supporting a monster like Donald Trump could change that without as much trouble as you might think.

So..."trust" the National Enquirer before the New York Times is you want.

It is to your disadvantage; to the disadvantage of the nation; and by extension, to the disadvantage of humanity.

(No exaggeration!)

Has nothing to do with Trump. I just happen to think the NYT is trash when it comes to news. Have since at least 2003 with that Jayson Blair thing.
 
Last edited:
Says a lot about you. The NYT is the paper of record and has great esteem. One of the worlds best and most trusted papers.

If I want news I'd read USA Today. Any newspaper that would run an anonymous op-ed as if it were real is irresponsible at best.
 
Has nothing to do with Trump. I just happen to think the NYT is trash when it comes to news. Have since at least 2003 with that Jayson Blair thing.

Okay...and that is your right to think that.

FOR NOW!

The Germans of 1930's Germany had a right to think what they wanted about the newspapers of their day...before they helped Adolf Hitler to MAKE GERMANY GREAT AGAIN.

Wake the hell up...and start actively opposing Donald Trump...America's Hitler.
 
If I want news I'd read USA Today. Any newspaper that would run an anonymous op-ed as if it were real is irresponsible at best.

But YOU have no problem posting what amounts to op-ed pieces every day using Anonymoose...rather than your real name...right?
 
If I want news I'd read USA Today. Any newspaper that would run an anonymous op-ed as if it were real is irresponsible at best.

it is only anonymous to us. The NYT knows who wrote it. So they did not print an anonymous letter. They printed one written by a Trump insider and withheld his name. Not at all irresponsible. USA today is crap. Shallow and weak.
 
Wake the hell up...and start actively opposing Donald Trump...America's Hitler.
I already did once with my vote. Probably will again depending on who the libertarian party and dems nominate.
But I have little faith dems will nominate anybody palatable . They haven't since Walter Mondale.
 
Last edited:
If I want news I'd read USA Today. Any newspaper that would run an anonymous op-ed as if it were real is irresponsible at best.

I do agree with that sentiment. That Op-Ed seemed to be a lifeboat test for Conservatives in a post-Trump world.

Clearly, the lifeboat has some holes in it.
 
I already did once with my vote. Probably will again depending on who the libertarian party and dems nominate.
But I have little faith dems will nominate anybody palatable . They haven't since Walter Mondale.

well you likely are a short bus school of econmics guy
 
Back
Top