Woodward's revelations raise disturbing questions about Trump

A Trump official just wrote an opinion piece for the NYT. He backed up the Woodward book clearly. Trump is a bomb in the Whitehouse. He is unqualified for the job and I hope we have learned a valuable lesson. We need professionals in the government. Experience and intelligence matters. Trump has neither and it shows.


He is a child...intellectually and mentally unfit for the job.

I can understand why he is the darling of some people.
 
Yeah, typical righty answer. black is white and right is wrong. you guys are so sad. Never lose to you ill-informed lovers of low-class propaganda.

Still flailing away with those limp wrists I see Nordberg. You and Domer make team.
 
Woodward has made no "revelations". More fictional fake news from anonymous sources, and disgruntled former Trump associates.

yawn1.gif
When a journalist or paper (NYT) writes tabloid type stuff using "anonymous sources" it really discredits their material.
They're basically saying, "you should believe me just because I say you should". Poor journalism at best.
 
The Times was obviously concerned about what a mess the letter told . They were doing their civic duty, letting the people learn about what Trump has going. There were lots of stories about Trumps goofiness. He has fired or had a third of his positions reopened. His utter disdain for the administration is well known. His lack of respect for everybody but himself is also not a secret. The childish accidental president is causing great harm. His horrible temper with screaming like a harridan has been oft reported. We should be embarrrassed by him, most of us are.
 
When a journalist or paper (NYT) writes tabloid type stuff using "anonymous sources" it really discredits their material.
They're basically saying, "you should believe me just because I say you should". Poor journalism at best.

The NY Times does not write "tabloid type stuff."

It reports the news.

Most of the material that you are finding "tabloid"...is news that MUST be reported. The safety of our Republic depends on the people realizing just how disgusting this administration is.
 
The Times was obviously concerned about what a mess the letter told . They were doing their civic duty, letting the people learn about what Trump has going. There were lots of stories about Trumps goofiness. He has fired or had a third of his positions reopened. His utter disdain for the administration is well known. His lack of respect for everybody but himself is also not a secret. The childish accidental president is causing great harm. His horrible temper with screaming like a harridan has been oft reported. We should be embarrrassed by him, most of us are.

We are, indeed!
 
The NY Times does not write "tabloid type stuff."

It reports the news.

Most of the material that you are finding "tabloid"...is news that MUST be reported. The safety of our Republic depends on the people realizing just how disgusting this administration is.
They do a good job with arts, culture, sports, lifestyle, etc.
But for news, I trust the National Enquirer before the NYT. No exaggeration. The NYT has become the CNN of newspapers.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_York_Times_controversies
 
Last edited:
They do a good job with arts, culture, sports, lifestyle, etc.
But for news, I trust the National Enquirer before the NYT. No exaggeration. The NYT has become the CNN of newspapers.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_York_Times_controversies

That is your right...for now, Moose.

It is a fragile right, though. A relatively small group of people supporting a monster like Donald Trump could change that without as much trouble as you might think.

So..."trust" the National Enquirer before the New York Times is you want.

It is to your disadvantage; to the disadvantage of the nation; and by extension, to the disadvantage of humanity.

(No exaggeration!)
 
Back
Top