Woodward's revelations raise disturbing questions about Trump

[domer76]

Sure they would. Their desperation is appalling.

As is your willful ignorance. Why would the NYT be desperate?

 

[domer76]

The sources are anonymous.

No shit, Einstein. That source is anonymous to you and me. Not to the NYT. Or are you unable to understand that?

 

[Truth Detector]

As long as this man is in this office...this country is in trouble...BIG TROUBLE!

Wrong and stupid. As long as liberals act like boorish whiny petulant little asshats and think they can overturn an election this country is in BIG trouble. Let's hope the American voters see this and keep Republicans in power this fall. We need to send a message to the morons on the left.

 

[domer76]

BULLSHIT.....the NYT would print it if it was the editor's pet cat and the janitor was translating it speaking in tongues.......I give neither you or the NYT any credit......

Ruh roh!

More concocted "if/would" horseshit.

Logical fallacy. Another failure.

 

[Truth Detector]

Obviously, you have not paid attention to his posts.

 

[Truth Detector]

Woodward’s book is consistent with the NYT Op-Ed piece and confirms what any rational, observant person has noticed about Orangetweet.

The only ones that don’t recognize those truths are you willfully ignorant Trumpanzees.

 

[Truth Detector]

lol

Pally boy, I run roughshod over your RW illiterate fucktards on a daily basis. Most of your moronic friends don’t know the difference between an adjective and a proper noun.

So, spare me that kind of horseshit.

 

[Nordberg]

Sure they would. Their desperation is appalling.

What are they desperate about? That made no sense,..

 

[Truth Detector]

Isn’t it, though? Go ahead. Keep defending your illiterate, halfwit pals. I watch with amusement.

Run along now, little boy.

 

[Truth Detector]

LOL, bullshit

 

[Truth Detector]

lol

Liar. If integrity mattered to you, you’d not be here giving tacit approval to that incompetent child in the Oval Office.

 

[Truth Detector]

For anyone...especially Donald Trump.... to question the honestly and veracity of a man whose word is beyond reproach...is unbelievable. Woodward won two Pulizer Prizes....

Does Sarah Huck Saunders understand she will be going to Helll when she repeats Trump's lies? Does she think she is immune to burning in Hell?

Three of Woodward's sources quoted in the book said they were fabrications. How do you square that with this so-called integrity factor?

 

[Sailor]

As is your willful ignorance. Why would the NYT be desperate?

Be gone "little" man. You bore me.

 

[Sailor]

What are they desperate about? That made no sense,..

They are trying to make themselves significant again. That boat left the dock a very long time ago.

 

[domer76]

Three of Woodward's sources quoted in the book said they were fabrications. How do you square that with this so-called integrity factor?

Of course they did, ignorant shitcake. What did you expect? The truth from someone in the Trump Administration?

Now, because you are an illiterate little cuntwhistle, unable to articulate a cogent response, cue the same stupid fucking little meme.

Predictable cretinous lemming.

 

[domer76]

Be gone "little" man. You bore me.

Yep, just as I thought Called on your bullshit again and unable to respond.

Go out and play with the kids, shitweasel. You're out of your league with me.

 

[Sailor]

Yep, just as I thought Called on your bullshit again and unable to respond.

Go out and play with the kids, shitweasel. You're out of your league with me.

No "little" man. Everyone just gets tired of lowering themselves to your level.

 

[Nordberg]

They are trying to make themselves significant again. That boat left the dock a very long time ago.

The paper of record. The number one paper in the country. It needs to become relevant? Founded in 1861. Now it needs an op-ed letter to become relevant? WTF. There in no more significant paper in the country. Rightys say the craziest things.

 

[domer76]

No "little" man. Everyone just gets tired of lowering themselves to your level.

Still can't respond, can you, twitboy? Again. Still.

 

[Sailor]

The paper of record. The number one paper in the country. It needs to become relevant? Founded in 1861. Now it needs an op-ed letter to become relevant? WTF. There in no more significant paper in the country. Rightys say the craziest things.

The NYT has become nothing but a partisan hack media source. Not worth the paper it is printed on. That is why their subscriber base is steadily dropping.