Woodward's revelations raise disturbing questions about Trump

Nordberg said:
A Trump official just wrote an opinion piece for the NYT. He backed up the Woodward book clearly. Trump is a bomb in the Whitehouse. He is unqualified for the job and I hope we have learned a valuable lesson. We need professionals in the government. Experience and intelligence matters. Trump has neither and it shows.
Click to expand...
sorry, the fact you are full of shit outweighs the purported value of your claims.......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
same thing I expect everyone to say......that you're an idiot and ignore the truth for partisan reasons.......
Click to expand...

The truth is, ignorant Trumpanzee, is the NYT knows who the author is, which confirms he is a top WH official. You can be in denial all you want, dumbshit. That’s how willfully ignorant Trumpsuckers like you operate.
 
Nordberg said:
Hilarious that 2 things that are not connected at all, are in your limited mind. Woodward is a highly respected reporter and has been since Watergate. He has been a go to reporter for over 50 years. Liberals read such books and make up their own mind how much to believe. Rightys don't read it, but know whether it is true or not. That it a religious mindset.
Click to expand...

Woodward is your prophet, and he's making a nice profit.
 
domer76 said:
Woodward’s book is consistent with the NYT Op-Ed piece and confirms what any rational, observant person has noticed about Orangetweet.

The only ones that don’t recognize those truths are you willfully ignorant Trumpanzees.
Click to expand...

What are the sources of the NYT op-ed?
 
For anyone...especially Donald Trump.... to question the honestly and veracity of a man whose word is beyond reproach...is unbelievable. Woodward won two Pulizer Prizes....

Does Sarah Huck Saunders understand she will be going to Helll when she repeats Trump's lies? Does she think she is immune to burning in Hell?
 
PostmodernProphet said:
lol.....hardly.......he could be a janitor at the NYT.......all it means is the NYT confirms what the NYT claims......
Click to expand...

The NYT would not have printed it if it was a janitor. You know that much, I think. perhaps I give you too much credit. The NYT knows who wrote it and they agreed to not reveal it.
 
Nordberg said:
The NYT would not have printed it if it was a janitor. You know that much, I think. perhaps I give you too much credit. The NYT knows who wrote it and they agreed to not reveal it.
Click to expand...

Sure they would. Their desperation is appalling.
 
Nordberg said:
The NYT would not have printed it if it was a janitor. You know that much, I think. perhaps I give you too much credit. The NYT knows who wrote it and they agreed to not reveal it.
Click to expand...

BULLSHIT.....the NYT would print it if it was the editor's pet cat and the janitor was translating it speaking in tongues.......I give neither you or the NYT any credit......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top