You mean the niggers, right?
ROFL
Ship them all to California, as well as all the other minorities, then watch how soon white liberals move out of California.
You mean the niggers, right?
Woo....How embarrassing. Talk about mixing your metaphors!I hit "Yes," on the poll, thinking it was about secession. Obviously, America would be better without the South.
Unfortunately, Mott can't spell, or he's being sneaky. The poll reads "succeed," which is not likely to ever happen for the moronic buffoons of the South.
You mean the niggers, right?
Phlllbbbbttt....who are you kidding. We've been supporting the south since reconstruction. In fact that would be a good name for the South "Reconstruction." cause every 20 years or so we gotta pay to rebuild them.The north has all the wonderful bankers who improve the lives of everyone. Three cheers for the money changers
Neither is Texas....but then again....Texas never has been much of a team player.Florida is not really part of the South, and Id be okay with keeping the liberal enclaves of Charleston and New Orleans, even Savannah.
You mean the niggers, right?
Oh, is that what you call them?
don't blame the land for the rot in some peoples brains
define what you think is the south
Only TEXAS talks like that. It's clearly Texas. The most monetary corrupt state in the UNION of America.
First, I think the word you're looking for is "secede". Many Southern states are already "succeeding" in comparison to their Northern neighbors. And second, if it means politicians like Debbie Wasserman Shultz and Alan Grayson have to leave Florida, I say suspend the Northbound turnpike tolls so it can happen faster.Would the US be better off if we permitted the South to succeed from the Union?