Yea or Nay

If punishment isn't a deterrent for crime, then why do we have any kind punishment? Where's your proof that punishment isn't a deterrent?

The problem with you libtards is that you think that people are fundamentally good, and are just going to do the right thing because it makes them feel warm and fuzzy. We conservatives know better.
 
"Let's coddle the rapists and murderers! They're just nice folks who made mistakes! Hey, let's just let all the criminals out of jail!"

Dumber76
 
Right said:
"Let's coddle the rapists and murderers! They're just nice folks who made mistakes! Hey, let's just let all the criminals out of jail!"

Dumber76
Click to expand...

You are one major dumbfuck. The explanation of your fallacious cause-and-effect claim went right over your head. With you, I feel like I'm talking with a third grader. A retarded third grader.

Prove your claim, asswipe, or shut the fuck up.

(Prediction: you can do neither)
 
domer76 said:
You are one major dumbfuck. The explanation of your fallacious cause-and-effect claim went right over your head. With you, I feel like I'm talking with a third grader. A retarded third grader.

Prove your claim, asswipe, or shut the fuck up.

(Prediction: you can do neither)
Click to expand...

OR, you could try and refute it. :dunno:
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
OR, you could try and refute it. :dunno:
Click to expand...

He made the claim that statistics prove that the death penalty in New York caused the crime rate to decrease. His to prove. It's simplistic correlation that does not prove cause in any way. Violent crime across the country has been decreasing, death penalty or no death penalty. Here's a similar leap of logic:

"As sun screen sales increase, the rate of drowning deaths increases sharply.
Therefore, sun screen use causes drowning."

It really has nothing to do with increased summer activities.
 
domer76 said:
He made the claim that statistics prove that the death penalty in New York caused the crime rate to decrease. His to prove. It's simplistic correlation that does not prove cause in any way. Violent crime across the country has been decreasing, death penalty or no death penalty. Here's a similar leap of logic:

"As sun screen sales increase, the rate of drowning deaths increases sharply.
Therefore, sun screen use causes drowning."

It really has nothing to do with increased summer activities.
Click to expand...

Uh oh, any minute now that moron will be calling you "The Dude".
:rofl2:
 
domer76 said:
He made the claim that statistics prove that the death penalty in New York caused the crime rate to decrease. His to prove. It's simplistic correlation that does not prove cause in any way. Violent crime across the country has been decreasing, death penalty or no death penalty. Here's a similar leap of logic:

"As sun screen sales increase, the rate of drowning deaths increases sharply.
Therefore, sun screen use causes drowning."

It really has nothing to do with increased summer activities.
Click to expand...

I know you have problems with anything that goes against your beliefs; but execution does reduce crime, because the executed criminal will never victimize anyone else again.
And public viewing of an execution may just make someone who was thinking of committing a violent crime, rethink what they were planning.
 
Right said:
If punishment isn't a deterrent for crime, then why do we have any kind punishment? Where's your proof that punishment isn't a deterrent?

The problem with you libtards is that you think that people are fundamentally good, and are just going to do the right thing because it makes them feel warm and fuzzy. We conservatives know better.
Click to expand...

Remember that we were to have speedy trial of our peers ? That "speedy" part was not a throwaway term.
Lose the speedy and lose the sense of cause and effect.

We had a couple monsters here where I live who got caught after a multiple murder. In under two years they got tried convicted through appeals and stricken from this mortal coil.
Compare that to scum like mumia etc screwing around for ten twenty YEARS. What makes this a joke? You got it, no speedy.
 
Celticguy said:
Remember that we were to have speedy trial of our peers ? That "speedy" part was not a throwaway term.
Lose the speedy and lose the sense of cause and effect.

We had a couple monsters here where I live who got caught after a multiple murder. In under two years they got tried convicted through appeals and stricken from this mortal coil.
Compare that to scum like mumia etc screwing around for ten twenty YEARS. What makes this a joke? You got it, no speedy.
Click to expand...

And that is exactly what's wrong with part of our Court system.
In situations where there is NO DOUBT of the guilt, the system should let nature take it's course.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
I know you have problems with anything that goes against your beliefs; but execution does reduce crime, because the executed criminal will never victimize anyone else again.
And public viewing of an execution may just make someone who was thinking of committing a violent crime, rethink what they were planning.
Click to expand...

Dream on dumbshit. Public execution? Really? lol

Keep up with the simplistic and fallacious cause-and-effect bullshit. Do us all a favor and try to inform yourself on a topic before you make yourself a fool
 
USFREEDUMBRACISTREPUBLICANTRUMPTARD1724544 said:
I believe the correct term, is Hanging; because lynching sounds so "vigilante".
Click to expand...

Aren't you calling for forgoing a trial?
What else does "letting nature take it's course" mean, if not a lynching?
 
Leonthecat said:
Aren't you calling for forgoing a trial?
What else does "letting nature take it's course" mean, if not a lynching?
Click to expand...

Since you obviously weren't able to see what was first said, prior to your complaining, I'll repost it and just to help you, I've underlined the part that should help you.

And that is exactly what's wrong with part of our Court system.
In situations where there is NO DOUBT of the guilt, the system should let nature take it's course.

You're welcome.
 
USFREEDUMBRACISTREPUBLICANTRUMPTARD said:
Since you obviously weren't able to see what was first said, prior to your complaining, I'll repost it and just to help you, I've underlined the part that should help you.

And that is exactly what's wrong with part of our Court system.
In situations where there is NO DOUBT of the guilt, the system should let nature take it's course.

You're welcome.
Click to expand...
How is that "no doubt" to be arrived at, that is different from what the "system" does now?
What change in "the system" are you proposing?
 
Leonthecat said:
How is that "no doubt" to be arrived at, that is different from what the "system" does now?
What change in "the system" are you proposing?
Click to expand...

You truly are clueless and couldn't figure something out, if you had a map and someone was helping you.

Rant on, McDuff. :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top