yes on the syrian resolution says the congressional peeps

making fun of real threats gives you things like 911

Desh I've never thought my life was worth the life of one child. If I were killed in a terrorist attack and some fuckwit used my name to justify bombing any country, I would be so pissed I would come back if I could just to kick them in the balls.

You want to be safe? Feed people, don't bomb people.
 
should they have bombed their delivery system?

On the word Of IRAN???????

If they were truly concerned about chemical weapons, they would have immediately investigated and made great effort to stop it. How is that difficult to figure out?

How is it difficult to figure out that the sarin was being smuggled to Al Qaeda, not the Syrian government?

I'm going to leave you alone on this issue because it's obvious that you don't care about facts, don't really care about about dead civilians.

Not sure how you come back from this with any credibility at all .. and that's sad.
 
I will not ever live in a world where children are gassed as a political method to power and just shut up about it.

live with that guys

Would you be happier if those children were executed with machine guns? You seem to be ramped up more about means than the principle of killing children. But maybe I am missing something in your endless ranting
 
Would you be happier if those children were executed with machine guns? You seem to be ramped up more about means than the principle of killing children. But maybe I am missing something in your endless ranting


I would be happy if the world banned guns.

you with me?
 
the world is a dangerous place.


the partisan ship manuvering has reached a crescendo and you are keeping the people who have the intel that we cant see from acting when we need.

This country because of Bush and his distruction of the people trust is now frozen

deja mirror......
 
lets me tell you again.

After the gassing horrors of WWI the world decided that chemical weapons were so horrible they would be banned from the planet.


They did not ban guns or tanks they banned chemical weapons.


what you are trying to say is they should have banned all weapondry too?
 
I would be happy if the world banned guns.

you with me?

You didn't answer the question. You merely asked a question.

No worries. I got my answer. We get it. You think that the way to teach Assad not to kill his own people is by killing his own people.

Great reasoning.

O-BOMB-YA should really think about putting you in the payroll for being such a loyal minion.

You know this vote could very well cost OBOMBYA the Senate and Congress. Although there may be some RINOS looking new employment like Grahmnesty.

The good news is that now the amnesty bullshit is stalled.
 
this is NOT a false flag


this happened


Not everyone is going to agree with you that Assad is responsible for the chemical weapons attack. And some people that agree with you that Assad is responsible for the chemical weapons attack are not going to agree with you that the United States should take military action in response. You really ought to just accept that and move on.
 
nope im going to make you see the error of your ways.

this world deemed chemical weapons as illegal after the horrors of WWI gassings.


They were CORRECT in that moral decision and it held pretty damned well until Ronny rayguns decided Sadam needed to off some people and sold him chem weapons and played smiled and said nothing about the thousands of people Sadam gassed.


Now its become common practice since Bush took the shit cork out of the bottle that is the mid east.



Some times you have to act
 
If you don't stand for something you will fall for anything

Just because someone doesn't "stand for" the same thing you do, doesn't mean they don't' stand for anything.

For instance I stand for not bombing people.

And you really should take a chill pill because posting 100 times a minute? Not helping your case.
 
nope im going to make you see the error of your ways.
this world deemed chemical weapons as illegal after the horrors of WWI gassings.


They were CORRECT in that moral decision and it held pretty damned well until Ronny rayguns decided Sadam needed to off some people and sold him chem weapons and played smiled and said nothing about the thousands of people Sadam gassed.


Now its become common practice since Bush took the shit cork out of the bottle that is the mid east.



Some times you have to act


Translation Dung: I'm going to continue to post the same thing "facts" "facts" "facts" over and over and over again

The irony of course which we can all see (except for Desh unfortunately) is you aren't changing anyone's mind Desh. Your repeated chants don't do anything. I'll even admit I'm somewhat on the fence about what to do here but your rants do nothing for me. Maybe if you spoke more in depth about what you expect the results to be, what effect (positive or negative or both) on the U.S. now and into the future for U.S. policy in the Middle East. What if we do get more involved than we initially plan? There are lots of variables at play and things are rarely as simple as they sound "we'll bomb their delivery systems, no one will get hurt in the process, and the U.S. will be done".
 
Back
Top