You must refuse illegal orders!

[ThatOwlWoman]

the only rule books are the Constitution and the laws of the land...............that's not the problem, though

According to pEarl, there are military rule books. What IS the problem?

And how have you been? Haven't seen you post in a while.

 

[Libhater]

The patriotic Democrat message is a good one. You must refuse unlawful orders. Why do you evil trumptard fucks have such a problem with following the law?

What unlawful order?

 

[Libhater]

Keep crying Trumpper, They did not tell them to question orders, why do you feel the need to lie. They told them they cannot follow illegal orders.

Yes, TACO is likely to issue illegal orders. I believe that is very likely, the guy does not care about the law.

TACO is likely to issue illegal orders? Wow, he's likely to issue illegal orders? So did those 6 treasonous dems specifically quote
what illegal orders Trump supposedly issued? Of course they didn't.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

That never came up. However if it did, they would be following legal orders. Right wing deflection hits again.

shall not be infringed. I'm tired of schooling you on the 2nd Amendment.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

According to pEarl, there are military rule books. What IS the problem?

And how have you been? Haven't seen you post in a while.

the military rule books are specifically to address conduct and protocols, which vaguely addresses the mandate to not follow unlawful orders, but does not address what unlawful orders are.

i've been run ragged. My wife had surgery in August and October on her elbow, which was infected and necrotic/ulcerous.

I've been unemployed since February, so no insurance.......Now I owe a ton of med bills and been playing wound care doctor. The good news is I now have a job that starts Dec 1st and her elbow is healing well. Thank you for asking. Hope things are well with you.

 

[LurchAddams]

What unlawful order?

If you had any knowledge of The Military Code of Conduct, you would know, fucktard. You really should only discuss topics you're qualified to understand. This is obviously way over your head, trumptard.

 

[Libhater]

If you had any knowledge of The Military Code of Conduct, you would know, fucktard. You really should only discuss topics you're qualified to understand. This is obviously way over your head, trumptard.

Give us your highly educated knowledge of the specific unlawful order that Trump supposedly ordered.

 

[Nomad]

Give us your highly educated knowledge of the specific unlawful order that Trump supposedly ordered.

He ordered Mike Pence to UNLAWFULLY refuse to confirm the electoral vote count after the 2020 election, trumptrash.

If he'd order his VP to something as blatantly illegal as that, are you so fucking stupid and blind that you don't think he'd order the military to do something illegal as well?

Or is it just a case of when trump does something illegal, you just don't give a shit?

Keep in mind also, that these boat strikes in the ocean off the coast of South America with no proof or evidence of wrongdoing and no due process, have all been UNLAWFUL.

Brainhater.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

And yet military schools and police academies and law schools, etc all say you are wrong.

What? Are you really claiming that illegal orders are commonly given on a regular basis?

 

[T. A. Gardner]

He ordered Mike Pence to UNLAWFULLY refuse to confirm the electoral vote count after the 2020 election, trumptrash.

That is not a military order or anything to do with the military.

If he'd order his VP to something as blatantly illegal as that, are you so fucking stupid and blind that you don't think he'd order the military to do something illegal as well?

Now you are applying what at best is a fallacy of composition using a fallacy fallacy. First, you assume that Trump ordered his VP to do something illegal. Then comes a fallacy fallacy since that order didn't involve the military and that's what we're discussing. Next, from those fallacies you argue that because Trump--according to you--issued an illegal order to his VP that ANY order he gives the military is illegal as well.

That is a fucking TDS level of insanity that is completely new and beyond anything before it.

Keep in mind also, that these boat strikes in the ocean off the coast of South America with no proof or evidence of wrongdoing and no due process, have all been UNLAWFUL.

According to you. That doesn't count.

Brainhater.

Braindead.

 

[Nomad]

That is not a military order or anything to do with the military.


Now you are applying what at best is a fallacy of composition using a fallacy fallacy. First, you assume that Trump ordered his VP to do something illegal. Then comes a fallacy fallacy since that order didn't involve the military and that's what we're discussing. Next, from those fallacies you argue that because Trump--according to you--issued an illegal order to his VP that ANY order he gives the military is illegal as well.

That is a fucking TDS level of insanity that is completely new and beyond anything before it.


According to you. That doesn't count.

Braindead.

Fuck you TA Garbageman.

If trump would order his VP to break the law, why should anyone in their right mind believe he wouldn't order the military to do so, which he is already doing vis-a-vis the boat strikes off South America.

Go shove your face back in trump's ass crack, sack-licker.

 

[Nomad]

Now you are applying what at best is a fallacy of composition using a fallacy fallacy. First, you assume that Trump ordered his VP to do something illegal. Then comes a fallacy fallacy since that order didn't involve the military and that's what we're discussing. Next, from those fallacies you argue that because Trump--according to you--issued an illegal order to his VP that ANY order he gives the military is illegal as well.

This ... is what totally, undeniably, irredeemably FULL OF SHIT looks like.

For anyone who wants to see ...

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Fuck you TA Garbageman.

If trump would order his VP to break the law, why should anyone in their right mind believe he wouldn't order the military to do so, which he is already doing vis-a-vis the boat strikes off South America.

Go shove your face back in trump's ass crack, sack-licker.

 

[Into the Night]

Akin to Abu Ghraib and the Malay massacre.

Does anyone here disagree American troops should be required to follow illegal orders?

Disobeying an unlawful order is required by law!

Therefore they should ignore the orders from these Senators.

 

[Into the Night]

Cry more, Trumpper.

Reminding the troops of their obligations is nowhere close to sedition.

It is not the obligation of any military personnel to follow sedition.

 

[Into the Night]

So why are Trumppers crying in their cheerio's and discussing the death penalty over these guys "wasting their time?" If our military is so easily insulted we are in trouble, I doubt any significant number of them are insulted. YES, even if the illegal order comes TRUMP himself, it's still illegal.

What illegal order from Trump?

 

[Nomad]

You're obviously the one who needs to cram a case of that up your ass, you 25 year old meme posting halfwit.

 

[Into the Night]

The constitution.

The Constitution of the United States clearly provides the President with authority as Commander in Chief of the military.

DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE CONSTITUTION YOU DESPISE!

 

[Into the Night]

Keep crying Trumpper, They did not tell them to question orders, why do you feel the need to lie. They told them they cannot follow illegal orders.

Yes, TACO is likely to issue illegal orders. I believe that is very likely, the guy does not care about the law.

Food doesn't issue orders, Pretender. Food is not sentient.

 

[Into the Night]

I did not say that.

DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!