Feminists like Darla Get Their Way: Kennedy Annointed Choice, Like it or not

cawacko said:
Jarod that was a hoax.


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/13/arts/television/13hoax.html
Click to expand...

come on, don't be destroying their fun like that.

Remember this one...

"Last month Eisenstadt blogged that Samuel J. Wurzelbacher, Joe the Plumber, was closely related to Charles Keating, the disgraced former savings and loan chief. It wasn’t true, but other bloggers ran with it."

I think we had a whole thread on that started by Desh.
 
leaningright said:
Thank you.
Click to expand...

Do you guys know how to read?

The pranksters behind Eisenstadt acknowledge that he was not, through them, the anonymous source of the Palin leak. He just claimed falsely that he was the leaker--and they say they have no reason to cast doubt on the original story. For its part, Fox News Channel continues to stand behind its story.

The "hoax" was not the story about Palin, which FOX NEWS STANDS BY, but rather, that this guy took "credit" for being the leaker.

Jesus.
 
Superfreak said:
Again with your idiotic bullshit. Look at her past 30 years... what has she done?

She passed the bar, but does not appear to have ever practiced law.

She was good at fundraising.

She co-wrote two books and compiled a couple of poetry books.

Oh... lets not forget, she attended funerals and stuff on behalf of her family.

If you truly believe she is the most qualified woman in NY then either you are an idiot or NY is sadly lacking any strong female leaders.
Click to expand...

She? I believe you mean, Senator Caroline Kennedy? You might as well as get used to saying it now. I don't want you to have a sudden heart-attack in January, after Hillary is confirmed, and Caroline becomes Senator. A seat which she can keep for the rest of her life in this state. Voting, every time, the exact opposite of how you would vote.

I mean, unless she wants to move up from there...

:clink:
 
Dungheap said:
Oh, so you're upset that questions that you asked and that people answered several times over were not singularly addressed by me? I'm honored but really, get over yourself.

As I said and as the questions above reveal, all you are concerned with is her last name (and, previously, the fact that she kept it after she got married) and you discount anything else about her. It's funny how damn envious you are. Get over it. She's the next Senator of New York.
Click to expand...

and yet again, the question is ducked.

Not one of you twits has stated why you think she is the most qualified woman for the job. Not one. You just keep chirping 'she wrote books, she did 'stuff' for the NYC dept of Education (great, she was a fundraiser)'

Then you idiots continue to chirp 'we addressed it, we addressed it'

Do you honestly expect us to believe that CO-writing a couple of books or being able to fundraise makes her the best candidate?

She is getting this annointment because of her name. Period.
 
Superfreak said:
come on, don't be destroying their fun like that.

Remember this one...

"Last month Eisenstadt blogged that Samuel J. Wurzelbacher, Joe the Plumber, was closely related to Charles Keating, the disgraced former savings and loan chief. It wasn’t true, but other bloggers ran with it."

I think we had a whole thread on that started by Desh.
Click to expand...

Well, I knew you and Cawacko didn't know how to read, but I thought Leaning did.

Interesting.

Does this come and go depending on how much ass-shaking is involved, or can you guys never read?
 
Superfreak said:
and yet again, the question is ducked.

Not one of you twits has stated why you think she is the most qualified woman for the job. Not one. You just keep chirping 'she wrote books, she did 'stuff' for the NYC dept of Education (great, she was a fundraiser)'

Then you idiots continue to chirp 'we addressed it, we addressed it'

Do you honestly expect us to believe that CO-writing a couple of books or being able to fundraise makes her the best candidate?

She is getting this annointment because of her name. Period.
Click to expand...

I've already answered your question, day after day. This is exactly why you are out of your mind. You're disturbed SF. And I noticed that your mental condition is triggered by powerful, strong women. I mean, who can forget your Hillary performances?

But now, Hillary will be Sect of State, or, Madam Secretary to you, and Caroline Kennedy will be called Senator Kennedy...and maybe some day you will be calling her Madam as well. But not Madam Secretary. :)
 
Darla said:
She? I believe you mean, Senator Caroline Kennedy? You might as well as get used to saying it now. I don't want you to have a sudden heart-attack in January, after Hillary is confirmed, and Caroline becomes Senator. A seat which she can keep for the rest of her life in this state. Voting, every time, the exact opposite of how you would vote.

I mean, unless she wants to move up from there...

:clink:
Click to expand...

sorry, but I think you mean senator caroline kennedy. Women don't get their titles or names capitalized. Got to keep them in their place.

:cof1:
 
Darla said:
I've already answered your question, day after day. This is exactly why you are out of your mind. You're disturbed SF. And I noticed that your mental condition is triggered by powerful, strong women. I mean, who can forget your Hillary performances?

But now, Hillary will be Sect of State, or, Madam Secretary to you, and Caroline Kennedy will be called Senator Kennedy...and maybe some day you will be calling her Madam as well. But not Madam Secretary. :)
Click to expand...

Only if she is taking over for Heidi Fleiss
 
Superfreak said:
Only if she is taking over for Heidi Fleiss
Click to expand...

Oh, so you buy women? You know, men who buy women hate women, and they seek out women who sell themselves in order to verify their own low opinion of women.

I'm sorry to hear this. Those kind of men rarely end up happy.
 
Darla said:
Oh, so you buy women? You know, men who buy women hate women, and they seek out women who sell themselves in order to verify their own low opinion of women.

I'm sorry to hear this. Those kind of men rarely end up happy.
Click to expand...

Sometimes they're just guys who can't get laid.

You know, at least prostitutes are honest.
 
cawacko said:
she's trying to claim it wasn't a hoax? Feminism run wild effects brain cells.
Click to expand...

Can someone help me here?

The pranksters behind Eisenstadt acknowledge that he was not, through them, the anonymous source of the Palin leak. He just claimed falsely that he was the leaker--and they say they have no reason to cast doubt on the original story. For its part, Fox News Channel continues to stand behind its story.

This is from Cawacko's own link, stating that the story itself was not a hoax. Can someone explain this to them? Does anyone here have experience teaching retarded adults? I'm not fluent in DUH, and I'm really have trouble getting down to their intellectual level.
 
Darla said:
Oh, so you buy women? You know, men who buy women hate women, and they seek out women who sell themselves in order to verify their own low opinion of women.

I'm sorry to hear this. Those kind of men rarely end up happy.
Click to expand...

LOL... well you know us short fatties have no other choice.

FYI... you don't actually have to use the services of a madam to call her a madam.
 
Darla said:
Do you guys know how to read?

The pranksters behind Eisenstadt acknowledge that he was not, through them, the anonymous source of the Palin leak. He just claimed falsely that he was the leaker--and they say they have no reason to cast doubt on the original story. For its part, Fox News Channel continues to stand behind its story.

The "hoax" was not the story about Palin, which FOX NEWS STANDS BY, but rather, that this guy took "credit" for being the leaker.

Jesus.
Click to expand...

I have no doubts that Fox News had someone from the camp tell them that Palin didnn't know Aftica was a continent or thought it was a country or whatever. My question is was it true and what was the situation that surrounded the incident?

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Politics/Story?id=6196407&page=1
"However, Stapleton told ABC News the Fox News report on Africa and NAFTA was taken out of context. She explained that during a briefing session, someone asked Palin to explain the McCain-Palin stance on an issue, and as she was responding, "in the middle, she said 'country of Africa' and somebody instantly wrote it down and said, 'Oh, my God, she thinks it's a country.'""

I have read many things surrounding this one incident several times because I didn't think that even the bumbling McCain would select someone that ignorant of basic geography. From everything that I have found while researching this, this is the way it went down.
 
Darla said:
Do you guys know how to read?

The pranksters behind Eisenstadt acknowledge that he was not, through them, the anonymous source of the Palin leak. He just claimed falsely that he was the leaker--and they say they have no reason to cast doubt on the original story. For its part, Fox News Channel continues to stand behind its story.

The "hoax" was not the story about Palin, which FOX NEWS STANDS BY, but rather, that this guy took "credit" for being the leaker.

Jesus.
Click to expand...


They will jump on anything to save some shred of dignity they might can graps onto!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top