Why were American Indians not citizens until 1925?That is basic American Constitutional law. Why does it so confuse Reichwingers?
Why were American Indians not citizens until 1925?That is basic American Constitutional law. Why does it so confuse Reichwingers?
Clearly you know you are playing fast and loose with the language. You probably thought you could be cute and get away with it. Not with meYou are confusing two different parts of the amendment
Fifth Amendment says, "No person shall be subject, except in cases of impeachment, to more than one punishment or trial for the same offense; nor shall be compelled to be a witness against himself; nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor be obliged to relinquish his property, where it may be necessary for public use, without just compensation. ...Except in cases of impeachments, and cases arising in the land or naval forces, or the militia when on actual service, in time of war or public danger ... in all crimes punishable with loss of life or member, presentment or indictment by a grand jury shall be an essential preliminary"It says STATE ....
Why were American Indians not citizens until 1925?
Cocktail parties on Martha's Vineyard helps.
Fifth Amendment says, "No person shall be subject, except in cases of impeachment, to more than one punishment or trial for the same offense; nor shall be compelled to be a witness against himself; nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor be obliged to relinquish his property, where it may be necessary for public use, without just compensation. ...Except in cases of impeachments, and cases arising in the land or naval forces, or the militia when on actual service, in time of war or public danger ... in all crimes punishable with loss of life or member, presentment or indictment by a grand jury shall be an essential preliminary"
Nah, Jerri and the rest of the Stalinists are desperate and panicking.Clearly you know you are playing fast and loose with the language. You probably thought you could be cute and get away with it. Not with me
Indeed.And our laws say the President and the SOS can expel enemies of the state.
Indeed.
It only makes sense. Biden illegally let these people into the country the President can legally expel them.Indeed.
John Robert is huge disappointment.Hollywood John got to meet Julia Roberts at one of Barack and Michelle's star studded galas. He just loves being part of the "in crowd."
And Nancy let's him know in advance which stocks will be affected by legislation, making him a very wealthy man.
Yes but not this. They didn't pay taxes or serve in the military to support and protect the country. The SCOTUS said they weren't citizens of the USA in Elk v Wilkins. The man that wrote the 14th Amendment was still alive and politically active writing many articles. He was silent on the SCOTUS decision.America has a lot to atone for, doesn't it?
He is exactly what Bush wanted.John Robert is huge disappointment.
Yes but not this. They didn't pay taxes or serve in the military to support and protect the country. The SCOTUS said they weren't citizens of the USA in Elk v Wilkins. The man that wrote the 14th Amendment was still alive and politically active writing many articles. He was silent on the SCOTUS decision.
Laws cannot invalidate the constitution.And our laws say the President and the SOS can expel enemies of the state.
That means they are entitled to present a case in court. They have rights. Throwing them on a plane and sending them to a country they have never been to is not subjecting them to jurisdiction.Not one bit. You are. You are using words that aren’t in there. Subject to the jurisdiction is key clause
This cat has both in spadesYou are either stupid or trying to play fast and loose with the language. Which is it?
One thing is for sure El Salvador isn't subject to our constitution and those low lifes who touched down there aren't going to be seen again.That means they are entitled to present a case in court. They have rights. Throwing them on a plane and sending them to a country they have never been to is not subjecting them to jurisdiction.
The key is the Trumpys do not care about the law. That is one of Trump's definitions of winning.
Do you examine your medications to make sure someone didn't slip you something, Joe?This cat has both in spades
Even if they were American citizens?One thing is for sure El Salvador isn't subject to our constitution and those low lifes who touched down there aren't going to be seen again.
The ends justify the means. Keep going Mr. President and tell that bald headed chicken fucker in the black robe to pound sand as many times as it takes to clean up Biden's mess.
According to the Constitution, every PERSON has the right to due process, wether trump accuses them of being a non-citizen or not.It's good to see the abject fear in you of the Stalinist left.
Anchor babies have not existed in decades. Children are not allowed to apply for their parents' visas until they are 21, so hardly babies. Then it goes in the waiting list, which can last over a decade. Finally, they can only get a visa if they are not here illegally, nor have been here illegally in the last 10 years.But what do you think your post has to do with Comrade Jerri's meltdown about potentially losing anchor babies?