In my case I like to take a nice shower, to take care of my beautiful hair

[ULTRA MAGA]

Can we have toilets that flush please?

And rinse at least half the bowl?

 

[T. A. Gardner]

And yet, I do not get charged much most months, like a little less than $15.

You dumped all that money into those useless solar panels instead.

 

[Diesel]

Five minutes of work at most and you can remove the flow restrictor from a shower head or faucet yourself. Stupid, useless, government regulation that only affects the stupid and lazy.

Yet you don't think that Fat Fuck Big Mac Baby is stupid, useless, and lazy for not removing the flow restrictor from a shower head or faucet.

You feckless pussy.

 

[Diesel]

If you use a lot of hot water daily, an instant hot water heater is a terrible choice. The power draw on those things is immense. The best choice for high use is a hot water heater + tank booster.

Put one of those on my tank. My cost was $325. That little gem increases tank capacity by about 1/3rd and uses no more power than the tank itself.

Problem is the old bulbs cost less than $1 each while the new ones cost $5 to $10 each.

Do you math much?

$1 per year * 13 years = $13

$5 to $10 for 13 years = $5 to $10

^ MAGA expressing MAGA stupidity

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Yet you don't think that Fat Fuck Big Mac Baby is stupid, useless, and lazy for not removing the flow restrictor from a shower head or faucet.

You feckless pussy.

He just wants the retards, idiots, morons, and trailer trash, like you, to have lots of hot shower water too. You should be thanking him.

 

[Diesel]

He just wants the retards, idiots, morons, and trailer trash, like you, to have lots of hot shower water too. You should be thanking him.

I don't have a shortage of hot water. Do you live in a trailer park like your fellow retards, idiots, and morons, you dumb bitch?

 

[Diesel]

Doesn't make up for that huge power draw. Your electric billing rate is usually set on peak demand for the month. The massive spikes a tankless creates will easily double your per kwh costs.


So, you were stupid enough to pay for 20 + years of electricity upfront rather than as you use it. Dumb move.

I think you underrate incandescent bulbs.

Well, we do know that ancient cucks like you don't give a fuck about the future, your children, or their children. I will be alive much longer than 20 more years and choose to make rational decisions.

 

[Diesel]

All too often depriving us of quality of life as the feature not a bug.

WOKE is absolutely a Death Cult.

For what purpose do you need hot water? You don't cook or bathe.

 

[Diesel]

Can we have toilets that flush please?

Porta Potties don't flush. Maybe move into a building that has functional plumbing.

 

[Diesel]

You dumped all that money into those useless solar panels instead.

Useless? My 2024 utility expenses were lower than they have ever been in my entire home owning existence. I wouldn't employ them in Seattle, but those of us who don't live in shitholes like you do have saved money and benefited the environment. Can you remember the last thing you did that made a positive difference?

 

[Lionfish]

President Donald Trump signed a new executive order Wednesday in pursuit of a familiar and elusive goal: “Undoing the left’s war on water pressure.”

The President on Wednesday directed Energy Secretary Chris Wright to roll back Obama- and Biden-era rules limiting pressure in shower heads. In particular, he railed against efficiency standards getting in the way of grooming his iconic coiffure.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/04/09/trump-shower-water-pressure-executive-order-00283036

Great move President Trump. It lefties idea of allowing ZERO water pressure into the hydrants in LA did not work out so well for them.

 

[Lionfish]

I don't have a shortage of hot water. Do you live in a trailer park like your fellow retards, idiots, and morons, you dumb bitch?

Well, we do know that ancient cucks like you don't give a fuck about the future, your children, or their children. I will be alive much longer than 20 more years and choose to make rational decisions.

For what purpose do you need hot water? You don't cook or bathe.

Porta Potties don't flush. Maybe move into a building that has functional plumbing.

Useless? My 2024 utility expenses were lower than they have ever been in my entire home owning existence. I wouldn't employ them in Seattle, but those of us who don't live in shitholes like you do have saved money and benefited the environment. Can you remember the last thing you did that made a positive difference?

Jesus Christ man, get your life together.

 

[Walt]

You dumped all that money into those useless solar panels instead.

Solar panels have the use that they make electricity, which can be used to power most of the mechanisms of modern society. It is insane to say they are useless.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Solar panels have the use that they make electricity, which can be used to power most of the mechanisms of modern society. It is insane to say they are useless.

Useless by comparison to other means of generation. Solar panels are at most currently about 25% efficient, only work when the sun is shining, and limited by the watt density of sunlight. That makes them the singularly most inefficient means of continuous electrical production there is.

 

[Walt]

Useless by comparison to other means of generation. Solar panels are at most currently about 25% efficient, only work when the sun is shining, and limited by the watt density of sunlight. That makes them the singularly most inefficient means of continuous electrical production there is.

They require no input, other than light, so put another way, they are the most efficient means of electrical production.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

They require no input, other than light, so put another way, they are the most efficient means of electrical production.

Wrong. They convert light to electrical energy and are only about 25%--at best--efficient at doing so. How they are installed will only decrease their efficiency. For example, fixed home solar arrays are only about 15 to 20% efficient.

Also, in terms of producing a kilowatt-day of power they come out terrible and far behind all other means of production.

Adding to their inefficiency, they have to have DC output converted to AC power resulting in additional loss.

 

[Walt]

They convert light to electrical energy and are only about 25%--at best--efficient at doing so.

There were plants hundreds of millions of years ago, that converted some of the sunlight into carbon compounds. Some of those were covered by dirt. Some of that was trapped underground for long enough that it created oil. A huge amount of energy was used to drill, pump, refine, transport, etc, and then a gasoline generator that may get 50% efficiency is used to make electricity. I would be shocked if 0.001% efficiency converting light into electricity was achieved.

Or put another way, light that would have been completely wasted creates 10-20% electricity, so is much more efficient than doing nothing.

Or how about, gasoline costs money, where as sunlight is free. The use cost efficiency is infinite.

 

[Hawkeye10]

There were plants hundreds of millions of years ago, that converted some of the sunlight into carbon compounds. Some of those were covered by dirt. Some of that was trapped underground for long enough that it created oil. A huge amount of energy was used to drill, pump, refine, transport, etc, and then a gasoline generator that may get 50% efficiency is used to make electricity. I would be shocked if 0.001% efficiency converting light into electricity was achieved.

Or put another way, light that would have been completely wasted creates 10-20% electricity, so is much more efficient than doing nothing.

Or how about, gasoline costs money, where as sunlight is free. The use cost efficiency is infinite.

You yap so much, You sound so smart, But then are wrong so often.

This is something to notice.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

There were plants hundreds of millions of years ago, that converted some of the sunlight into carbon compounds. Some of those were covered by dirt. Some of that was trapped underground for long enough that it created oil. A huge amount of energy was used to drill, pump, refine, transport, etc, and then a gasoline generator that may get 50% efficiency is used to make electricity. I would be shocked if 0.001% efficiency converting light into electricity was achieved.

Or put another way, light that would have been completely wasted creates 10-20% electricity, so is much more efficient than doing nothing.

Or how about, gasoline costs money, where as sunlight is free. The use cost efficiency is infinite.

Most oil was created by diatoms in the oceans that died, sank to the bottom where they decomposed into methane that was in its solid state due to the low temperatures and high pressures present. This was then covered up by sediment and over time became oil. Plants decomposing in bogs and swamps likewise over time became coal.

Oil and gas are far more efficient in terms of cost. Oil and gas are both portable and usable 24/7 versus the intermittent operation of solar.

 

[Hawkeye10]

Most oil was created by diatoms in the oceans that died, sank to the bottom where they decomposed into methane that was in its solid state due to the low temperatures and high pressures present. This was then covered up by sediment and over time became oil. Plants decomposing in bogs and swamps likewise over time became coal.

Oil and gas are far more efficient in terms of cost. Oil and gas are both portable and usable 24/7 versus the intermittent operation of solar.

This is highly disputed.