We're miles apart in viewpoint.
I totally get it. I will defend your right to your view ... but I might ask you to explain it, as I am doing now, and if what you are saying is stupid then I will mention it.
I think he's one of the worst.
Then your list of valid reasons pointing to his official duties must be extensive. Can you list here your top, say, seven?
The only thing I was happy about is that he didn't finance any new war while he was President,
You weren't happy about him putting America first? Why not? Do you HATE the US?
btw, Congress finances wars, not the President. That was a somewhat stupid comment to make.
Trump's achievements in his official duties surpassed those of all other Presidents. Shall I presume that you weren't happy with any US Presidents?
And he briefly considered having RFK Jr. as his "Vaccine Czar". Apparently, Big Pharma then gave him some money and he let go of that idea.
This never happened.
I'm not even sure what you mean by "official duties". Care to elaborate?
Perhaps you should read the Constitution and know it. Once you do, you'll see the stupidity in your commentary. You can't be holding the President responsible for that which is not within his authority.
Presumably because it wasn't one of his official duties I imagine. It was [a campaign ad], yes.
Correct. It was not the performance of his official duties. It was a campaign speech in which he was delivering a message. You did not listen to the message. You simply listened for trigger words and ... became triggered. Why do you think his message of putting America first resonated with so much of America? Why do you think Trump won by a landslide in both elections, such that the DNC was forced to steal the second one? Why do you think record numbers of "blacks" and hispanics jumped ship from the DNC to vote for Trump?
Answer: They listened to the message, and disobeyed orders from the DNC to simply become triggered. You, instead, opted for becoming triggered. I'd be interested to know who is doing your thinking for you.
It was absolutely accurate and you know it. You haven't even attempted to mention anything that was inaccurate because you are well aware that you simply allowed yourself to become triggered and are now far too embarrassed to admit it ... and to distract attention away from your pettiness and irrationality, you are attempting to blame me, and others who actually listened to the message and who disobeyed orders to become triggered, for your confusion.
You are the one being totally irrational on the matter. You are the one who can't support his positions in the slightest when it should otherwise be too easy.
If you can't figure it out, I think this conversation is coming to a close.
That's what all leftists say before tipping their king, ducking their tails between their legs and fleeing to the hills. It's a cowardly cop-out.
I have no idea what you're talking about. I guess I have to spell out my objection. More than anything, it's these lines:
"They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists."
... and you naively believe that there are no drugs being brought into this country over the border. You're being stupid. You think that there are no criminals entering the US from Mexico. You are being stupid. You think that there are no rapists entering from Mexico. You are being stupid. All of your feigned outrage is a lie.
Now, imagine if some Canadian Prime Minister were to say that of Americans going to work in Canada.
Aha! So you did OBEY orders to become triggered by individual words. I notice that you didn't make any attempt to reference any statistics. You simply became triggered over mere words, at the behest of others who do your thinking for you.
As an American, would you not only say that that would be an innacurate statement, but also be strongly offended?
Am I an American? My words always stand on their own.
Everything Trump said was accurate, nay, indisputable. You are deluding yourself into denying the obvious. Yes, there are drugs, weapons, trafficked humans, contraband, violent criminals, prostitutes, major diseases and laundered money entering the United States from Mexico every day. You try to deny all of this with feigned outrage at Trump for merely mentioning it. As promised, I'm mentioning when you are being stupid.
I suppose that's the type of rhetoric that fits right in with Trump fans.
Absolutely ... and yours is the rhetoric of undereducated, scientifically illiterate, mathematically incompetent and logically inept leftists who OBEY others who do their thinking for them and who regurgitate everything they are instructed to believe.
So, whenever you can get around to providing your top several valid reasons that Trump wasn't the best US President ever (per official duties, no tweets or campaign ads), it would be greatly appreciated.
I find it ironic that you seem to have more sympathy for Gazans then the people who are just south of your border.
Nobody is egregiously violating the Geneva Conventions to perpetrate genocide of Mexicans. When that day comes, I will demand accountability for that as well.
Have you ever heard of a film called "Under the Same Moon"? Here's a trailer:
Thank you. It looks potentially interesting. I notice that all Mexican characters in the movie speak in English. That wasn't my experience any time I was in Mexico. Nonetheless, I presume it is a tale of hardship, not one of pursuing the American dream and achieving success, yes?
I also finished listening to the audio version of this book, quite good: Love Across Borders: Passports, Papers, and Romance in a Divided World | goodreads.com
I know MANY who have encountered this exact logistical problem. In every case but one, the relationship was not one of love but of a person seeking US residency/citizenship through a sham marriage. The one exception, between two people (one American and one Mexican) who decided to get married in Mexico, ended in divorce (due to spousal abuse) before the Mexican could achieve citizenship.
No, but in this case I do believe the accusation is true.
Why? Does your belief stem from any rational basis or from your purely irrational TDS?
I imagine we could probably agree on some of those, certainly if you weren't a fan of the vaccine mandates, for one.
One cannot decry the
Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male and then applaud the
Nationally Mandated Experiments of Untested Vaccinations.
The English was fine, but I missed some rather important words,
... then the English wasn't fine and it needed to be rewritten. Thank you for doing so.
I recently heard someone say that when Trump was President, the U.S. didn't bankroll any major wars and put effort into getting out of the wars that the U.S. was already in.
Correct. Trump was the "anti-globocop."
.
