Alabama QB Jalen Hurts in NCAA transfer portal, can be contacted by other schools

LMAO!!! Too funny. You spend how many months (years?) verbally attacking Alabama football, with some of the most ridiculous arguments and harping on meaningless details. And I am the one who can't get over something or is venting my frustrations. You must be one miserable human being.

I have been a fan of Alabama football since I was a kid. I do not spend my time demeaning others unless they start with me. And even then it is minimal. When other teams win, I congratulate them. I enjoy the game. And I enjoy being part of something.

There you go again equating disagreement with you and something being ridiculous. That Alabama hasn't gone 15-0 and Clemson has isn't meaningless. It's in line with what you've been saying. I'm only pointing out facts. I'm not then frustrated but Nick Saban sure was when his team got their asses kicked on Monday. Alabama fans in the stands looked frustrated, too.

I'm loving it watching a die hard fan make so many excuses for the team he supports. You're as bad a a drug addict that won't admit his addiction.
 
Have I claimed Alabama is unbeatable? Because that is the only way your claim is valid. Is Alabama great right now? You bet your ass they are. Look at the wins over the last 10 years and it is undeniable.

And if someone says something about Alabama, I don't get my feelings hurt. I discuss or debate the issue. But that is why this forum exists. I certainly don't spend months or years trying to demean something that has no meaning for me.

You've admitted both losses to Clemson were upsets. Alabama is great right now? They just got their ass kicked by 28 points. Great teams don't lose like that.

You're feelings are hurt now. No, you spend months talking about how great Alabama is then making excuses when they lose. Get some help.
 
There you go again equating disagreement with you and something being ridiculous. That Alabama hasn't gone 15-0 and Clemson has isn't meaningless. It's in line with what you've been saying. I'm only pointing out facts. I'm not then frustrated but Nick Saban sure was when his team got their asses kicked on Monday. Alabama fans in the stands looked frustrated, too.

I'm loving it watching a die hard fan make so many excuses for the team he supports. You're as bad a a drug addict that won't admit his addiction.

I was not referring to Clemson going 15-0 when I talked about ridiculous. That is a major accomplishment.

But harping on and on about Jalen Hurts being a loser is ridiculous. Many of your other comments are ridiculous.

I have not made excuses. I have discussed reasons for certain things.
 
I was not referring to Clemson going 15-0 when I talked about ridiculous. That is a major accomplishment.

But harping on and on about Jalen Hurts being a loser is ridiculous. Many of your other comments are ridiculous.

I have not made excuses. I have discussed reasons for certain things.

When you talked about ridiculous, you were referencing disagreement with you. You called it ridiculous because of that.

Seems someone so die hard of a fan can't tell the difference between excuses and reasons. Only fellow Saban suckers call them ridiculous. Those of us unbiased call them excuses. You've admitted you're biased and that is clouding your vision.
 
You've admitted both losses to Clemson were upsets. Alabama is great right now? They just got their ass kicked by 28 points. Great teams don't lose like that.

You're feelings are hurt now. No, you spend months talking about how great Alabama is then making excuses when they lose. Get some help.

Did I admit they were upsets? Or did I simply explain why they were called upsets.

I am disappointed in the results of the national championship game. But my feelings are not hurt. Every team loses.

Is Alabama great right now? Hell yes they are great. Not the best team this year, but still great. Your view is that a team must be undefeated and #1 or they are a bunch of losers. That is utter nonsense.
 
Did I admit they were upsets? Or did I simply explain why they were called upsets.

I am disappointed in the results of the national championship game. But my feelings are not hurt. Every team loses.

Is Alabama great right now? Hell yes they are great. Not the best team this year, but still great. Your view is that a team must be undefeated and #1 or they are a bunch of losers. That is utter nonsense.

When you supported the claims that they were, you did. Now, you run from it. In fact, you referred to those that have called them upsets as the experts in the field.

Every team loses. Alabama got their ass kicked. There's a difference. 2017 game was a loss.

Where did I say a team has to be undefeated to be great. Do you have a quote you can cite?
 
When you talked about ridiculous, you were referencing disagreement with you. You called it ridiculous because of that.

Seems someone so die hard of a fan can't tell the difference between excuses and reasons. Only fellow Saban suckers call them ridiculous. Those of us unbiased call them excuses. You've admitted you're biased and that is clouding your vision.

I find it amusing that you claim to know why I do things. You can read my mind and know my motivations? Too funny!

I am a fan. I am biased. That does not mean I cannot see facts. But then, you have shown a greater bias than I have with your continuous rants against Alabama. Not once have you said anything positive about one of the legendary teams in college football. Not once have you said anything positive about one of the most impressive dynasties in the history of college football. But you have spent pages of posts trying to demean players and fans. You have called anyone who admires Nick Saban a cocksucker. Who is more biased?
 
When you supported the claims that they were, you did. Now, you run from it. In fact, you referred to those that have called them upsets as the experts in the field.

Every team loses. Alabama got their ass kicked. There's a difference. 2017 game was a loss.

Where did I say a team has to be undefeated to be great. Do you have a quote you can cite?

I accept the line from the experts in Vegas as based on volumes of research. They don't put that much money on the line without research.

In virtually every game one team will be favored.


Yes, Alabama got its ass kicked. I have stated that too. And we have lost at least one game in every season other than 2009 since 1992.
 
I find it amusing that you claim to know why I do things. You can read my mind and know my motivations? Too funny!

I am a fan. I am biased. That does not mean I cannot see facts. But then, you have shown a greater bias than I have with your continuous rants against Alabama. Not once have you said anything positive about one of the legendary teams in college football. Not once have you said anything positive about one of the most impressive dynasties in the history of college football. But you have spent pages of posts trying to demean players and fans. You have called anyone who admires Nick Saban a cocksucker. Who is more biased?

I can read your words and see when you run from them.

Bias involves prejudice and unreasoned judgment. You admit you're biased. A biased person can't see facts. It's why they're biased.

I state opinions. You call yours facts because you're biased. Perhaps your bias is why you can't admit what you're doing. You're like a drug addict that can't admit he needs help.
 
I accept the line from the experts in Vegas as based on volumes of research. They don't put that much money on the line without research.

In virtually every game one team will be favored.


Yes, Alabama got its ass kicked. I have stated that too. And we have lost at least one game in every season other than 2009 since 1992.


You're the one that called those claiming those games were upsets experts.

Why do you run from that connection now.
 
I can read your words and see when you run from them.

Bias involves prejudice and unreasoned judgment. You admit you're biased. A biased person can't see facts. It's why they're biased.

I state opinions. You call yours facts because you're biased. Perhaps your bias is why you can't admit what you're doing. You're like a drug addict that can't admit he needs help.

Oh, so when I do it it its blind bias, and when you do it its opinions? LMAO! Hilarious.

And still, you spend months/years spouting vitriol, without anything positive. I spent the same time discussing the achievements of my team, and congratulating those who beat us. I have posted congrats and good things about numerous teams. You have only spewed hatred. Your insistence that Hurts is a loser is a prime example.
 
You're the one that called those claiming those games were upsets experts.

Why do you run from that connection now.

I haven't run from anything. They ARE experts. The fact that they are not 100% correct does not change that. With millions of dollars at stake, do you think they rely on people who do not have expertise predicting the winners?

Any college football team can lose on any given Saturday. I have said that many times on this forum. That is why the games are exciting.
 
Oh, so when I do it it its blind bias, and when you do it its opinions? LMAO! Hilarious.

And still, you spend months/years spouting vitriol, without anything positive. I spent the same time discussing the achievements of my team, and congratulating those who beat us. I have posted congrats and good things about numerous teams. You have only spewed hatred. Your insistence that Hurts is a loser is a prime example.

You admitted you're biased. Since I don't really care who wins, bias can't exist.

Less Alabama players were arrested this year than in previous years. That's positive.

Just to be fair, Kelly Bryant is a loser because he's a quitter.
 
I haven't run from anything. They ARE experts. The fact that they are not 100% correct does not change that. With millions of dollars at stake, do you think they rely on people who do not have expertise predicting the winners?

Any college football team can lose on any given Saturday. I have said that many times on this forum. That is why the games are exciting.

You did. You said you didn't claim they were upsets. You called those that did experts then run from it those you defend get it wrong.

Are you really claiming Alabama had any chance of losing to The Citadel, Arkansas St., or LA - Lafayette?
 
I have not run from it at all.

You defended those you call experts and those experts called the two Alabama losses to Clemson upsets. Now, you refuse to admit you believed they were. You've called Alabama a dynasty. If Alabama is, as you claim, wouldn't losing to a dynasty be an upset?

You're running from it now, Forrest.
 
You did. You said you didn't claim they were upsets. You called those that did experts then run from it those you defend get it wrong.

Are you really claiming Alabama had any chance of losing to The Citadel, Arkansas St., or LA - Lafayette?

I explained why they were called upsets. I called they people who predicted the game experts.

Yes, there is always a chance. At halftime against The Citadel the score was 10-10. The chance may be slim, but there is always a chance.

But the context of our discussion was that Clemson's defeats of Alabama were considered upsets. That is a little different than Arkansas State.
 
You defended those you call experts and those experts called the two Alabama losses to Clemson upsets. Now, you refuse to admit you believed they were. You've called Alabama a dynasty. If Alabama is, as you claim, wouldn't losing to a dynasty be an upset?

I defended the fact that they are experts.

How would losing to a dynasty be an upset? And the dynasty part is the overall result of multiple seasons.
 
You admitted you're biased. Since I don't really care who wins, bias can't exist.

Less Alabama players were arrested this year than in previous years. That's positive.

Just to be fair, Kelly Bryant is a loser because he's a quitter.

Obviously you care who wins. When Alabama loses you harp on it. YOu try and demean the wins.

You are every bit as biased as I am. The difference is, you do it out of spite. It all started when I said "we" when I referred to Alabama.
 
I explained why they were called upsets. I called they people who predicted the game experts.

Yes, there is always a chance. At halftime against The Citadel the score was 10-10. The chance may be slim, but there is always a chance.

But the context of our discussion was that Clemson's defeats of Alabama were considered upsets. That is a little different than Arkansas State.

The experts you defend as experts called them upsets. Are you saying they're experts except in that claim?

The only chance Citadel had to defeat Alabama was before the opening kickoff. But do keep pretending if it makes you feel better. That would be an upset but you and I both know there was never a chance of it happening unless Alabama suffered the same tragedy as Marshall did in 1970.
 
Back
Top