Ancient ALIEN Creationism - science or new age RELIGION?

Dick from the Internet said:
That's not a part of any work he published, dumbass. He did not set forth his theory of evolution through letters to friends. LOL
Click to expand...

Look kid, the theory of evolution and abiogenesis began with Charles Darwin. You are clearly either being deliberately dense or you are retarded. There are no other choices................................

If you have medication take it..................please
 
PostmodernProphet said:
sigh......its a waste of time trying to have a legitimate conversation with shit like you......you asked me for a goalpost that will not change.....I gave you a goalpost that will not change.......you've been running ever since......fuck yourself and run away, but don't pretend you're a legitimate debater ever again......
Click to expand...

The odd thing to me is that this clown almost seems intelligent, but then he gets literally everything backwards. I feel there is mental illness here, because one can be brilliant and completely mentally ill..........................
 
TheDonald said:
The odd thing to me is that this clown almost seems intelligent, but then he gets literally everything backwards. I feel there is mental illness here, because one can be brilliant and completely mentally ill..........................
Click to expand...

nothing more complicated than a guy who hates losing an argument.......when he sees no chance to win he dodges every question......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
did you notice that in what you quoted I mentioned that you did not explain how metamorphosis evolved?.....you fucked up, now you're fucking up again.......just give it up before you end up looking even more stupid than you already do.....
Click to expand...

I noticed that you asked about whether the species was evolving between larval and adult stages.

PostmodernProphet said:
So we now understand metamorphosis....not about how it evolved in butterlies.....was it a flying creature that better survived by becoming a caterpillar (but didn't make it all the way to surviving better), so reproduced as a flying creature again?....
Click to expand...

A caterpillar is not the name of a species. It is the larval stage of moths and butterfies. Your question reveals that you are still conflating metamorphosis and evolution. You have serious reading comprehension problems.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
sigh......its a waste of time trying to have a legitimate conversation with shit like you......you asked me for a goalpost that will not change.....I gave you a goalpost that will not change.......you've been running ever since......fuck yourself and run away, but don't pretend you're a legitimate debater ever again......
Click to expand...


You never try to have a legitimate conversation, troll. You are a shitposter and all you have done here is try to change the subject, coward.

The discussion was about the claims of Ralph and other creationists that evolution is limited to "microevolution" or "horizontal evolution." You are too much of a chicken to give a consistent definition of that so you have just been giving us a display of how quickly you can move your goalposts. I am not impressed.
 
TheDonald said:
The odd thing to me is that this clown almost seems intelligent, but then he gets literally everything backwards. I feel there is mental illness here, because one can be brilliant and completely mentally ill..........................
Click to expand...


You don't seem intelligent at all to me. I posted the abstract of that paper and you proceeded to contradict it's claims point by point. Then there is your continued insistence that the "memory" analogy is a literal part of this. It's clear you have low reading comprehension abilities like the dumbass PiMPle.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
nothing more complicated than a guy who hates losing an argument.......when he sees no chance to win he dodges every question......
Click to expand...

The debate was about how evolution is limited to "horizontal evolution" or "microevolution" and you have been trying to change the subject like a coward rather than give us a definition of the terms.
 
Last edited:
Dick from the Internet said:
I noticed that you asked about whether the species was evolving between larval and adult stages.



A caterpillar is not the name of a species. It is the larval stage of moths and butterfies. Your question reveals that you are still conflating metamorphosis and evolution. You have serious reading comprehension problems.
Click to expand...

Relive your past failure instead of answering questions.....obviously a liberal.....are you embarrassed that you devoted so much arguing against your own faulty assumptions?.....
 
Dick from the Internet said:
You never try to have a legitimate conversation, troll. You are a shitposter and all you have done here is try to change the subject, coward.

The discussion was about the claims of Ralph and other creationists that evolution is limited to "microevolution" or "horizontal evolution." You are too much of a chicken to give a consistent definition of that so you have just been giving us a display of how quickly you can move your goalposts. I am not impressed.
Click to expand...

Dumbfuck won't discuss the definition I handed him.....can't handle having an unmovable goalpost.....what a dimwit.....if you ever growing a pair of balls to go with that tiny Internet dick, feel free to provide your "proof"......
 
Dick from the Internet said:
The debate was about how evolution is limited to "horizontal evolution" or "microevolution" and you have been trying to change the subject like a coward rather than give us a definition of the terms.
Click to expand...

So when you asked me to define macroevolution it was because the conversation was limited to microevolution?.....are even your fellow liberals stupid enough to buy that?....
 
Dick from the Internet said:
You don't seem intelligent at all to me. I posted the abstract of that paper and you proceeded to contradict it's claims point by point. Then there is your continued insistence that the "memory" analogy is a literal part of this. It's clear you have low reading comprehension abilities like the dumbass PiMPle.
Click to expand...

Copy and paste is a three year olds ability kid....................Try thinking clearly on your own, if you can
 
PostmodernProphet said:
So when you asked me to define macroevolution it was because the conversation was limited to microevolution?.....are even your fellow liberals stupid enough to buy that?....
Click to expand...

Learn to read, moron.

The debate was about how evolution is limited to "horizontal evolution" or "microevolution" and you have been trying to change the subject like a coward rather than give us a definition of the terms.
 
Dick from the Internet said:
Learn to read, moron.

The debate was about how evolution is limited to "horizontal evolution" or "microevolution" and you have been trying to change the subject like a coward rather than give us a definition of the terms.
Click to expand...

Where do you get off believing that other people have to agree with your lame ideas or participate in a debate about exactly what interest you
 
TheDonald said:
Where do you get off believing that other people have to agree with your lame ideas or participate in a debate about exactly what interest you
Click to expand...

Douchenozzle, Ralph was the one that brought up the subject. Of course, I don't expect any of you cowards to actually take a stand.
 
Dick from the Internet said:
Now that we know a mouse can pass down information about a scent it seems trivial to understand how an insect as adept at epigenetic change as the monarch might pass down information needed for its migration patterns. It becomes easy to explain how they even direct morphological changes to specific generations. They can probably use temperature to direct the epigenetic markers that tells each generation how big its wings need to be and by controlling reactions to scent and other stimulus they can probably tell them where to fly.
Click to expand...

Nifty idea, but most of that information can NOT be "learned". The mice passed down what they were taught.
 
Bigdog said:
Nifty idea, but most of that information can NOT be "learned". The mice passed down what they were taught.
Click to expand...

They passed down epigenetic markers. The mouse offspring does not learn to fear the smell. It's an "instinctual" response controlled by those epigenetic markets. Butterflies could easily do the same. It's not necessary that it be "learned" behavior.
 
Dick from the Internet said:
They passed down epigenetic markers. The mouse offspring does not learn to fear the smell. It's an "instinctual" response controlled by those epigenetic markets. Butterflies could easily do the same. It's not necessary that it be "learned" behavior.
Click to expand...

There are epigenic markers in monarch DNA for migration patterns? That would entail an Earth map......................So that is not happening. The fact is that no one knows how this is happening, and no one is even seriously looking at it, because this will rewrite every textbook as it proves we do not understand what DNA is, and that being said since we are forged out of DNA we can not know what we are. The answer is very machine like, even using electricity to power our CPU, the human brain, that creates other CPU's also needing electricity
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top