Another Month Brings Another World Heat Record

[T. A. Gardner]

What in the hell does that mean, “employed and productive are expected to support the unemployed and unproductive as if they were equally employed and productive”

You know the original... From each according to their ability to each according to their need...

The basic underlying tenant of all of Socialism. Where it fails is when it runs headlong into human nature.

 

[archives]

You know the original... From each according to their ability to each according to their need...

The basic underlying tenant of all of Socialism. Where it fails is when it runs headlong into human nature.

Which goes nowhere explaining what in the hell does “employed and productive are expected to support the unemployed and unproductive as if they were equally employed and productive” means

Want to try again? Let’s see you use your own words to explain something you said

 

[martin]

The problem comes, as I pointed out earlier, when the employed and productive are expected to support the unemployed and unproductive as if they were equally employed and productive. Nobody that's employed and productive wants to do that.

This is a "problem" our socialist obsessed citizens magnify to fit an agenda that has little bearing on reality but seems to have qualities of titillation. Like other capitalist economies the country learned long ago it is better for everyone to keep the unemployed from starving, and there always have been unemployed.

Currently the national unemployment rate is 4 percent.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Which goes nowhere explaining what in the hell does “employed and productive are expected to support the unemployed and unproductive as if they were equally employed and productive” means

Want to try again? Let’s see you use your own words to explain something you said

It means the exact same thing, except in real-life terms. The unemployment rate is much higher than 4%. That's just the U30 that measures how many people are actively looking for jobs but don't have one. It doesn't include those that aren't looking for employment--whatever the reason--but otherwise could be employed, and doesn't differentiate between part and full time jobs as well as double or triple counting people who have more than one job.

 

[Nordberg]

It means the exact same thing, except in real-life terms. The unemployment rate is much higher than 4%. That's just the U30 that measures how many people are actively looking for jobs but don't have one. It doesn't include those that aren't looking for employment--whatever the reason--but otherwise could be employed, and doesn't differentiate between part and full time jobs as well as double or triple counting people who have more than one job.

The employment rate used the same metrics the other admins have used. The point of the unemployment rate is to see if it is going up, or going down. I am sure you were silent when Trump broadcasted his unemployment stats. Then you were treating it properly. Trump castigated the methods when Obama was in office. When he got in office, he used the same ones, but embroidered them with lies.

 

[archives]

It means the exact same thing, except in real-life terms. The unemployment rate is much higher than 4%. That's just the U30 that measures how many people are actively looking for jobs but don't have one. It doesn't include those that aren't looking for employment--whatever the reason--but otherwise could be employed, and doesn't differentiate between part and full time jobs as well as double or triple counting people who have more than one job.

Oh, I see we’re returning with the Labor Participation Rate, which was fully explained and deflated back when it was erroneously employed to attack Obama, especially lost favor when it actually increased during Trump’s Presidency, you got to keep up “revolution”

And your whacky statement still stands unexplained, not surprising

 

[Into the Night]

Much like your claim of determining that a birth certificate is fake, you have Not shown that you have any knowledge in this area either. The funny thing is, you are so on the defensive about climate change that you can't even accept normal, non-man made weather occurrences related to ocean temperature.

'Expert' worship.

I do not defend 'climate change'. Climate cannot change.
It is not possible to measure the temperature of the ocean.

 

[Into the Night]

"The typical annual flu vaccine is usually tri- or quadrivalent meaning that it protects us against more than one flu strain."

I don't believe that's true. The success rate of the annual flu vaccine is generally around 50% because they don't account for multiple strains.

Argument from randU fallacy. It is not possible to measure the 'success' of any generally issued flu vaccine.

Math errors:
Failure to declare randX.
Failure to declare boundary.

 

[Into the Night]

Nope. It has that rather low rate (which is accurate) because they make educated guesses early in the year as to which strains will be most prevalent when flu season begins. In between deciding and creating the vaccines, mutations occur and new strains may even show up. There are dozens of influenza strains circulating at any given moment.

Math errors:
Failure to declare randX.
Failure to declare boundary.

Logic error:
Argument from randU fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Give it up. Righys are dismissing all science.

You are describing yourself, Sybil.

I read a couple of stories saying rightys are not using Sun Block lotion because they do not trust it.

Not science.

Some crazy anti science guy wrote the article and it made sense to rightys.

Not science.

Some rightys said it smelled like it was cancerous whatever that means.

Making shit up won't work, Sybil.

 

[Into the Night]

Reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of human nature. People are not automatons. They have moral centers, self respect, and this must be particularly true of those who dedicate themselves to a life's work in science. To suspect a few moral sell outs is one thing. To believe all or most are is unintelligent.

What 'science'?

 

[Into the Night]

Gardner et al believe that anyone who isn't a MAGAT is a member of "the radical Left."

MAGA isn't a person.

They are quick to paint any one with a different opinion in a negative light and lump us all together as a monolith.

The Democrat party is a conspiracy.

 

[Into the Night]

scientists lie all the time these days. look at fauci.

Fauci is not science or any theory of science. He is not a scientist.

 

[Into the Night]

The peer review process makes it incredibly difficult for scientists to lie about things actually related to science. Fauci is a politician. They stretch the truth and lie regularly.

Science does not use consensus. There is no voting bloc in science. There is no 'peer review' in science.

 

[Into the Night]

Climate change made US and Mexico heatwave 35 times more likely​

Climate change made US and Mexico heatwave 35 times more likely

A new report says extreme heat from May to June was driven by planet-warming emissions from humans.

www.bbc.co.uk

No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth, Moonbat. You cannot create energy out of nothing. You are still ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.

 

[ZenMode]

Science does not use consensus. There is no voting bloc in science. There is no 'peer review' in science.

Peer reviewing isn't about consensus. Educate yourself.

 

[Into the Night]

Yes, that's the problem with things Leftist and Leftist political theory. They think people are just interchangeable cogs in a machine called "society." If one cog isn't working correctly, they replace it discarding the defective cog.

That, for example, is the underlying problem with Socialism. It requires humans to be altruistic. That is, you are willing to give up your wealth and goods to others who don't produce their own wealth and goods without question. Doesn't happen in reality. The reality is those who can stop doing because they see no worth or value in continuing to contribute only to have it taken from them, while those who can't won't bother to even try as they get what they need handed to them for free. Sure, there are lots of degrees of that occurring, but it will occur.

The basic problem with all forms of socialism is that they are based on theft of wealth.

 

[Into the Night]

Helping to explain why we continue to have a capitalist economy in which almost every working Democrat is employed.

Your answer doesn't rebut, it agrees.

Capitalism exists in every nation.
Fascism (a form of socialism) exists in every nation.
Communism (a form of socialism) exists in every nation.
Slavery (a form of socialism) exists in most nations (including the US, although illegally).

 

[Into the Night]

The problem comes, as I pointed out earlier, when the employed and productive are expected to support the unemployed and unproductive as if they were equally employed and productive. Nobody that's employed and productive wants to do that.

And the reason is simple. It means stealing from the employed to support the unemployed and unproductive (communism).

 

[Into the Night]

Couldn’t have been put any better, all about creating a false paradigm to muddle the waters

Inversion fallacy. You are describing yourself again.