^ opinion and speculation which is not backed up or vetted by peer review from independent experts.This study also does not take into account the ratio of wind turbines to nuclear or fossil fuel generation. It is the same simple math I showed above. If wind turbines were to provide the same
amount of energy as Nuclear or FF generation they would be far deadlier than either. There is no getting around the math. Each and everyone of these studies deliberately leave that part out.
Shiny baubles for the uniformed. Works every time.
You complained that I only gave you one peer reviewed source from 2009.
I also gave you a second peer reviewed paper from 2013.
Here is a third source, from a reputable mainstream journalistic source.
https://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/data-mine/2014/08/22/pecking-order-energys-toll-on-birds
All three sources I gave you are from reputable sources, and all three conclude that avian fatalities from oil, coal, nuclear collectively are way, way higher than fatalities from solar and wind.
It's not even in the same ballpark.