Biden Said, "Come Get Them"; Trump Said, "Go Fuck Yourself"

Earl said:
“Willfully retained AND disclosed classified material"

Both are crimes committed by the turnip in the White House.

If he is not competent to stand trial for his crimes, how is he competent to be president?
Click to expand...

I posted the link to the report...plus Joe lied about having them in filing cabinets that were either locked or could be...
I guess he didn't remember they're in torn boxes next to the potting soil and the dog crate....as pictured...
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Exactly. Even a hostile RW special counsel agreed that in Biden's case, there was no chargeable crime. That's what the MAGATs are *really* butt-hurt about. Failed impeachment, failed attacks on his son, failed document charges... it goes on and on. So far I haven't seen any of them explain why, if Biden is as bad as they claim, no (R)s have attempted to remove him via the 25th Amendment. Isn't that what it's for?
Click to expand...

the doj argument said there was a crime, just that the defendant would win due to sympathy.

speculation on eventual outcome is never a valid legal reasoning.
 
TOP said:
https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf
Click to expand...

Oh, how adorable! You found something that disproves your own arguments! Good grrrl, good doggy!

From page 5 of your link:

However, for the reasons summarized below, we conclude that the evidence does not establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Prosecution of Mr. Biden is also unwarranted based on our consideration of the aggravating and mitigating factors set forth in the Department of Justice's Principles of Federal Prosecution. For these reasons, we decline prosecution of Mr. Biden.
Click to expand...
 
TOP said:
Read the report...Joe should be charged. They're excusing him for being too compromised to be tried...Spending 5 hours trying to question him confirmed that...
Click to expand...

That's not what it says at all, Cuntsuelo. You even posted the link that puts the lie to your gossip. Oopsies! :laugh:
 
Blazed Pascal said:
president trump took them as president.

he was covered under the presidential records act.

biden was not.

that's an important distinction.

trump did nothing illegal, biden did.
Click to expand...

1. Trump is not covered under the language of the act.

2. If his counsel believes he is covered why is the case still pending not thrown out on a motion to dismiss?
 
Blazed Pascal said:
the doj argument said there was a crime, just that the defendant would win due to sympathy.

speculation on eventual outcome is never a valid legal reasoning.
Click to expand...

That's not what it concludes, but if it makes your tiny intellect feel brave and strong to believe so, knock yourself out. BTW Toxic posted a link to the report. Check out page 5, Asshattard. :rofl2:
 
martin said:
1. Trump is not covered under the language of the act.

2. If his counsel believes he is covered why is the case still pending not thrown out on a motion to dismiss?
Click to expand...

yes he is.

because the judiciary is partisan and corrupt in this instance.
 
TOP said:
Joe still broke a number of laws regarding the documents...the cooperation factor doesn't figure into the situation, however...if a bank robber delivers the money to the police, he's still charged. Unless he's deemed mentally deficient and most likely unable to stand trial...
Click to expand...

The cooperation factor most certainly figures into the situation. Every law concerning documents about national security requires knowingly and willingly to retain documents when asked for them back.
The law about bank robbery doesn't have a part that says the robber has to knowingly and willingly retain the money when the bank asks for it back.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
The cooperation factor most certainly figures into the situation. Every law concerning documents about national security requires knowingly and willingly to retain documents when asked for them back.
The law about bank robbery doesn't have a part that says the robber has to knowingly and willingly retain the money when the bank asks for it back.
Click to expand...
Joe was not cleared of wrong doing...
 
TOP said:
Read the report...Joe should be charged. They're excusing him for being too compromised to be tried...Spending 5 hours trying to question him confirmed that...
Click to expand...

I did read the report. Clearly you haven't since you keep repeating lies about what is in it.

Biden supposedly couldn't remember what year Beau died. Not sure why that is even a question that should be asked when you are asking about documents.
Trump in his deposition couldn't remember what year he married Melania. I guess you think Trump has dementia now too, right?
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
The report states that there isn't enough evidence to charge him.
The way Hur tries to spin the comments is ridiculous and any defense attorney would get the charges thrown out if someone tried to indict Biden.
Click to expand...
"The evidence does not establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt".... because of his compromised mental condition...He clearly wasn't able to remember when he was VP...How would he remember what he did with documents and when...Like the ones he claimed were in file cabinets that were either locked or able to be locked. Which was clearly not the case... there's more than enough evidence...
 
tx-38p4gu_t3-jpg.1502082
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top