Capitalism Is EVIL!

[Into the Night]

Ahhh, so you are just guessing. I will remind you that contracts are extremely controlled arrangements.

No, they aren't. The only controlling factor is the contract itself.

 

[Into the Night]

I said you only need one person to believe something has value for something to have value

it's pretty axiomatic, but you and fallacy boy decided to challenge it

Nope. You need two.

If an item is never consumed, used, bought or sold, it has no value.

 

[Kafka]

See your local drug dealer.

And that's a market you think is a well-run market? A good market? Wow. How hard did you hit your head?

or

See the history of the personal computer.

Ummm, the personal computer came out of one or several well-regulated market economies.

 

[Lao Tse]

Ahhh, so you are just guessing. I will remind you that contracts are extremely controlled arrangements.

Define 'prices too high'. Who are YOU to determine what is 'too high'?

Transactions only occur when the two parties agree on a price. In every case, the price is just right. It's the agreed upon price.

if nobody can afford it and nobody is buying it, the price is too high, assuming moving product is the goal.

 

[Kafka]

No, they aren't. The only controlling factor is the contract itself.

LOLOL. You ever hear of contract law? Of course you haven't. You are a janitor.

 

[Into the Night]

Huh. So the mystery remains how an anencephalic know-nothing such as yourself could become one.

But the easier guess is that you never did. You aren't telling the truth.

You certainly don't seem to have ANY education. Your posting style read more like a demented toddler than a functional adult.

Insult fallacies (Mantra 1a).

I really don't give a flying fuck whether you believe I hold such a license or worked as an engineer in a couple of radio stations.
This is a blind forum. It doesn't matter.

 

[Into the Night]

if nobody can afford it and nobody is buying it, the price is too high, assuming moving product is the goal.

...and?

 

[Lao Tse]

...and?

so you seemed confused about the concept of a price being too high.

 

[Into the Night]

LOLOL. You ever hear of contract law? Of course you haven't. You are a janitor.

Irrelevant. The only controlling factor is the contract itself.

 

[Into the Night]

so you seemed confused about the concept of a price being too high.

Not at all. You are fixated on a single phrase. Read the rest of what I posted.

 

[Into the Night]

It's something called common sense. People freely entering into a contractual arrangement for the purpose of exchanging goods and services.

I guess this 'common sense' isn't so common among Democrats!

 

[zymurgy]

Nope. You need two.

If an item is never consumed, used, bought or sold, it has no value.

only one person needs to value an item for it to be bought

hence the saying one mans trash is another mans treasure

you might as well argue 1+1 <> 2

or swim upstream

either way, you lose

 

[Lao Tse]

Not at all. You are fixated on a single phrase. Read the rest of what I posted.

no.

I'm not confused about a price being too high.

 

[Into the Night]

And that's a market you think is a well-run market? A good market? Wow. How hard did you hit your head?

It's a free market. You can't kill the free market. It's immortal. It will still exist, even if you drive it underground into a black market.

Ummm, the personal computer came out of one or several well-regulated market economies.

The personal computer market is unregulated.

 

[Kafka]

Irrelevant. The only controlling factor is the contract itself.

LOL. Now the janitor fancies himself a law expert. LOLOLOLOLOL. Don't you have some puke to sweep up somewhere? Don't forget your sawdust.

 

[Kafka]

I really don't give a flying fuck whether you believe I hold such a license

I don't. I think I'm on pretty solid ground given your lack of intellectual responses to any post on this forum.

 

[Into the Night]

only one person needs to value an item for it to be bought

Paradox. Irrational. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox.

hence the saying one mans trash is another mans treasure

Cliche fallacy. You are still locked in your paradox.

you might as well argue 1+1 <> 2

1+1 = 10, in the right conditions!

There are 10 types of people: Those who understand binary and those who don't.

or swim upstream

either way, you lose

Did you know that swimming upstream is quite possible? Salmon, for example, do it every year.

 

[Into the Night]

no.

I'm not confused about a price being too high.

Fixation. Read the rest of the post.

 

[Lao Tse]

Fixation. Read the rest of the post.

just reiterate your arcane point more plainly.

how about that?

 

[Into the Night]

LOL. Now the janitor fancies himself a law expert. LOLOLOLOLOL. Don't you have some puke to sweep up somewhere? Don't forget your sawdust.

What have you got against janitors??