Cindy McCain says she will never release her finances

Damocles said:
BS. The reason she said that is because people are calling for her to release the records.

As it stands, does she deserve no privacy?

As for Teresa Heinz, she refused as well, it was online petitions and other things that "demanded" it.
Click to expand...

I can't believe you asked if she deserves privacy. You mean like Hillary got in the 90's, like that? You mean like they gave to Heinz-Kerry?

And I assume that these same people are now busy circulating petitions about Cindy, right?

What?
 
Darla said:
I can't believe you asked if she deserves privacy. You mean like Hillary got in the 90's, like that? You mean like they gave to Heinz-Kerry?

And I assume that these same people are now busy circulating petitions about Cindy, right?

What?
Click to expand...
I asked it in the same vein as that. It wasn't a partisan question.
 
cawacko said:
I think she release a couple of pages if I'm not mistaken.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I was trying to correct that.

she released some of the records, saying that releasing all of them would also release info on her sons. Total BS too. Taxes on a trust only show the filer's information.
 
Chapdog said:
did hillary release hers when she was first lady to bill? i never saw the whitewater stuff.
Click to expand...

Chap, heinz-kerry had to release hers. Cindy Mccain will play by the same rules. Period.

I dont even want to get into the fact that you and I paid many millions of dollars to investigate every paper the first lady ever touched duriing the 90's. If you can even ask that question, you were asleep, so whatever.

But four years ago, Heniz-Kerry was forced to release hers, and Cindy mcCain will be no different. That's all.

Liberals aren't forced to play by different rules than Republicans anymore. We used to have to, but then came the internet.
 
She's may not be giving the campaign any cash, but she is certainly helping the campaign by providing it access to her corporate jets and such. Flying around the country non-stop isn't free.
 
Darla said:
Well, that horse has left the barn, sorry.
Click to expand...
If it was "wrong" before why would that change now?

I don't suggest that she shouldn't have to. Just that if we want people to act a certain way, we should expect it from ourselves too.
 
Damocles said:
If it was "wrong" before why would that change now?

I don't suggest that she shouldn't have to. Just that if we want people to act a certain way, we should expect it from ourselves too.
Click to expand...

Yes. We should live in a world where Republicans throw every filth they can dream up at democrats, and people like me should say "that's wrong!" and then when we are running, we should say "I'm not going to do that, that's wrong!" and lose, and then the Republicans can throw every filth at us again while we comfort ourselves with "That's wrong!", and then we can have one party rule, which will make you happy, while you pretend otherwise and I can go to bed with my morals.

Or...you know, we can try something different.
 
Darla said:
Yes. We should live in a world where Republicans throw every filth they can dream up at democrats, and people like me should say "that's wrong!" and then when we are running, we should say "I'm not going to do that, that's wrong!" and lose, and then the Republicans can throw every filth at us again while we comfort ourselves with "That's wrong!", and then we can have one party rule, which will make you happy, while you pretend otherwise and I can go to bed with my morals.

Or...you know, we can try something different.
Click to expand...
We should live in a world where people reject the "filth" rather than rub it on themselves and proclaim it "justice".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top