Into the Night
Verified User
It's just as devastated.
Climate change follies: Wet denials
- Thread starter Taichiliberal
- Start date
Into the Night
Verified User
It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.
Science is not a graph.
A graph of random numbers means nothing.
Argument from randU fallacy.
Into the Night
Verified User
You are describing yourself again. Learn what 'climate' means. Climate cannot change. There is no such thing as a global climate.
You are describing yourself again. You cannot blame your problems on me or anyone else.
Into the Night
Verified User
I grow my own. I don't use any vegetables from the SDTC, since so little is produced anymore. You'll probably import yours from Mexico.
Into the Night
Verified User
Blatant lie. Don't try to deny your own posts.
You still shitposting? Thought maybe you'd get tired of your schtick by this time.
No, like most americans the majority of my table vegetables like lettuce etc come from the Central Valley.
Kudos for you to know how to grow vegetables...given your level of intellect expressed on this forum I am frankly surprised you know how to use a hoe.
Into the Night
Verified User
There isn't much of it, since the SDTC has been dismantling it's water collection systems.
Into the Night
Verified User
He already supported his position. RQAA.
Mostly rain...little snowpack.
His water??? You think he owns it???
Both are devastated, due to the effects of Democrats and King Newsom.
Into the Night
Verified User
I don't believe you. You've pretended before.
Irrelevance fallacy. They are both devastated due to policies by Democrats and King Newsom.
Into the Night
Verified User
You can't blame your problems on me or anybody else, dummy.
Funny thing is, you don't have to believe me. I know the difference between the Central Valley and the Imperial Valley.
LOL. You aren't even part of this conversation. Why do you stick your nose in? So you can look like an idiot?
Into the Night
Verified User
Most lettuce is not grown in the Central Valley. Most lettuce is locally produced.
Illiteracy:
Proper nouns are always capitalized.
Contractions used as a list item uses periods.
Into the Night
Verified User
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Once again, you keep trying to pass off your personal opinion, supposition and conjecture as "fact". Then you stupidly follow up that other MAGA moron with the "fallacy" squawking.Well, let's start with calling bullshit on the "unprecedented" natural weather occurrences. For example, the state hit hardest by "dry spells" was and is California, a blue state that has completely mismanaged their water supplies. That's a disaster of the Progressive Left's / Democrat's making there. Nevada and Arizona, next door, managed their water supplies much better through the latest drought period.
As for things like hurricanes, floods, and tornados, insurers simply dumped the costs of these on FEMA because they can't break even on them and sell reasonable policies. FEMA on the other hand, can use extortion of taxpayer money from those unaffected--the vast majority of Americans--to pay idiots for living in a doublewide trailer in the middle of a zone that's likely to have a weather-related disaster.
If you build in a flood plain, that's on you and you should have to shoulder the cost of making that idiotic choice. If you live where hurricanes occur, and don't hurricane proof your home, that's on you. That goes for anyone in any state, red or blue.
So, what you pose in the above is really just an idiotic complex question fallacy.
Your BS was put to rest YEARS ago. Here's what you can continue to ignore or try and cherry pick/out of context quote to fit your mantra:
7 Answers to Climate Contrarian Nonsense
Evidence for human interference with Earth’s climate continues to accumulateBY JOHN RENNIE
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/7-answers-to-climate-contrarian-nonsense/
Bottom line: ANSWER THE FUCKING QUESTION! Will all the red states who are catching ecological hell turn down federal assistance in accordance with their anti federal gov't "deep state" rhetoric?
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Once again, you've proven yourself to be nothing but a MAGA troll. The rational, objective and mature reader can follow the chronology of the posts and see your folly. Once I reduce you to this silly repetitive, inane gain saying I just leave you to your babbling and move on .... assured that you'll follow my posts and threads like a bitch in heat craving attention.I answered the OP, and even now did so in a direct manner.
I have every right to ask questions. There's a good reason why liberals get mad when I start asking questions.
What would Jesus do?
^^^^ That's YOU, good buddy!
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
good luck trying to get a rational, fact based answer. You'll note he avoids the core of my question for his detour. Once you follow him down that rabbit hole, it's like banging your head against a wall ... it feels so good when you stop.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Sure, once the corrupt socialist deep state federal government stops taking my tax dollars for it.
Will you forgo shipments of food, water, electricity, etc. from the "honest, capitalist MAGA-loving flyover country that you hate so much?
Climate change follies: Wet denials
Here's a thought: with all these "unprecedented" hurricanes, floods, tornados, heat waves, dry spells that are hammering the "red states" (and becoming more common place), will they forgo FEMA assistance from the corrupt, socialist deep state federal government they hate so much? :thinking:
www.justplainpolitics.com
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
When the deniers start hauling out the Big Oil charts and studies, I just ask them this simple question: Are they saying that over 230 years of global deforestation and urbanization has NO EFFECT on the global climate? If they say yes, then they've obviously never experienced or heard of "smog" in California.I love this kind of reasoning because it is basically showing its own ignorance.
Yes the planet's climate has changed in the past. We know this because of paleoclimatological studies. And we know it was all natural forcings which caused it which allows us to understand how natural forcings work.
So when the natural forcings DON'T line up with the climate change it means SOMETHING ELSE is in play. And guess what makes the data fit best? Yeah, including the NEW FORCINGS of human activities.
It's almost like science actually works! And climate change due to humans is REAL
I'll just leave this here for you to chew on:
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
On the subject of climate change Scientific American is fully invested into the propaganda of the Left.
New Minecraft ‘Heat Dragon’ Quest Has Gamers Fight Climate Villain
A new video game puts climate solution tools in the hands of up to 80 million Minecraft players
Climate Action Is a Labor Issue for This Teachers Union’s Leaders
The president of the Chicago Teachers Union explains how climate change became a pillar of the union’s contract demands
We Must Talk about Our Climate Crisis
Building community around solutions is crucial
The Right Words Are Crucial to Solving Climate Change
Speaking to people’s priorities can build the will needed to implement climate solutions
How Should You Talk to Policymakers about Climate Change?
Nobody knows for sure what the most effective strategy is, but I have a few ideas
Essentially, Scientific American--to which I subscribe, so you may not be able to see all the links--is fully into propagandizing and gaslighting climate change on a regular basis. Many of their articles on this suggest readers use logical fallacies and various propaganda methods to convince others that Gorebal Warming is real and an immediate threat.