DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
So only 1643 have synopses.
End Of DADT Means More Gay Rape In The Military
- Thread starter DamnYankee
- Start date
W
WinterBorn
Guest
No, that is not what he said. Every military crime report has a summary or synopsis. That is what he read.
If he was saying what you claim, he would have said it differently.
Besides, is your excuse that he reviewed less than half of the cases before making his pronouncement???
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Cite.
W
WinterBorn
Guest
Its in plain english in what Spriggs said.
First he stated, "Sprigg said his "analysis" was military documents tracking sexual assault cases. According to his figures, 8.2% of sexual assaults reported to military authorities in fiscal 2009 were homosexual in nature."
Then in his report he stated, ""FRC has reviewed the “case synopses” of all 1,643 reports of sexual assault reported by the four branches of the military for Fiscal Year 2009"
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Cite.
W
WinterBorn
Guest
You are trying to divert the conversation away from the fact that Spriggs cooked the books. He stated that he reviewed a certain portion of "...all 1,643 reports of sexual assault reported by the four branches of the military for Fiscal Year 2009".
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
You've made an accusation that the author lied, and refuse to cite evidence. The author says he reviewed "all cases with synopses". Cite that all reported cases have synopses.
W
WinterBorn
Guest
He did not say he reviewed all cases with synopses. He said "FRC has reviewed the “case synopses” of all 1,643 reports of sexual assault reported by the four branches of the military for Fiscal Year 2009"
Look at it again. "...of all 1,643 reports of sexual assault reported by the four branches of the military for fiscal year 2009".
A synopsis is just the summary of the case. To put it in simpler terms that you may be able to understand....
"FRC has reviewed the “case summaries” of all 1,643 reports of sexual assault reported by the four branches of the military for Fiscal Year 2009"
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Actually, he states:
Now where is your evidence that 'all reported case have synopses'?
W
WinterBorn
Guest
Have you ever dealt with criminal cases? (I know you haven't in the military)
Every case has a summary. It is the quick listing of facts. If you are wanting me to list all 3300+ cases to show they all have a synopsis, you are an idiot.
But that is simply more attempts at diversion from the original topic.
W
WinterBorn
Guest
The only difference between your quote and mine was that your included the definition of "fiscal year". I didn't feel that necessary.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
If 'every case has one', then it should be easy to prove. Yet you dance for four pages avoiding to. Why would that be? 
W
WinterBorn
Guest
If 'every case has one', then it should be easy to prove. Yet you dance for four pages avoiding to. Why would that be?
Because it is irrelevant.
Either he claims he reviewed every synopses of the 1,643 cases of sexual assault reported. In which case, he cooked the books. This is the way he stated it, so there shouldn't be any question here.
But you want to claim that only 1,643 of the cases had synopses. So you are saying that he reviewed less than half the cases and now wants to shape policy based on his partial review of the cases for a sing year?
Either way, the man's research is a joke.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
You claim he lied then. Prove it.
W
WinterBorn
Guest
The proof is in his own claims versus what is documented by the Pentagon.
If I cannot prove there are summaries in every criminal report, it changes nothing.
He made claims based on a set number of cases of sexual assault. He based his numbers and percentages on a set number of sexualk assaults. And it is not even half of the reported assaults.
Stop trying to divert the debate towards irrelevant information.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
If you cannot prove your accusation that the man made this whole issue up then published a report in a major venue, then yes it makes you look like the fool that you are. That's why you are making every excuse not to do it.
W
WinterBorn
Guest
If you cannot prove your accusation that the man made this whole issue up then published a report in a major venue, then yes it makes you look like the fool that you are. That's why you are making every excuse not to do it.
Horseshit! You have mocked the global warming advocates for less. Your hypocrisy is showing again.
I don't have to prove he made the whole thing up. I have shown that he doctored the numbers.
The fact of the matter is that Spriggs ignored over half of the reported sexual assault cases in order to make the gay sexual assaults a greater percentage.
You are just getting pissy because your great find turned out to be nothing more than a hate-monger cooking the books.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
:lol: Without you're little "cook" the remainder of his report would be meaningless. The depths you have gone to avoid proving your baseless allegation are epic.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Five pages of avoidance now. Truly an epic failure. Are you burning up Google? 
W
WinterBorn
Guest
No, my argument is not meaningless.
He claims to have reviewed all the sexual assault reports, and claims there were 1,642. The DoD says there were 3,353.