Even trumpers do not believe trump's defense

Lionfish said:
So the receptionist at a law firm believes it is OK to lie under oath? Better toddle back into the office and ask a real lawyer if that is OK.
Click to expand...
The "lawyer" there says the prosecutor brought in the liar Cohn to testify to "incontrovertible" evidence of Trump's crime. Why would such evidence of need a liar to testify to it's veracity?
 
Lionfish said:
QPeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee, derp derp,derp

Safe to assume I can add you to the ever growing list of barking leftoie moonbats that think there is no need for any of the presidential candidates to take a drug test before debates?

You would be in the company of Poor anchovies, nordie, and wally so far.
Click to expand...
If the drug test is done in public i am fine with that. We would finally see the drug cocktail that is keeping sniffles hoped up for the debates as it is just before the debates his sniffles become most pronounced.

 
Lionfish said:
So the receptionist at a law firm believes it is OK to lie under oath? Better toddle back into the office and ask a real lawyer if that is OK.
Click to expand...
Check mate legal system. Trump only surrounds himself with lying criminals as his lawyers and accountants, and in all key positions so that if they ever try to testify against him he can say 'they are liars and criminals.. checkmate system'.

that is genius as no gang mob boss has ever been convicted, in large part by his criminal murdering henchmen, who even admit to crime and teaching others on how to lie in court or to GJ's.

640px-Sammy_Gravano_%28arrest_photo_-_1990%29.jpg


If you cannot find an honest person who was witness to the crimes because he keeps no honest people around him... checkmate.

images
 
QP! said:
Check mate legal system. Trump only surrounds himself with lying criminals as his lawyers and accountants, and in all key positions so that if they ever try to testify against him he can say 'they are liars and criminals.. checkmate system'.

that is genius as no gang mob boss has ever been convicted, in large part by his criminal murdering henchmen, who even admit to crime and teaching others on how to lie in court or to GJ's.

640px-Sammy_Gravano_%28arrest_photo_-_1990%29.jpg


If you cannot find an honest person who was witness to the crimes because he keeps no honest people around him... checkmate.

images
Click to expand...
QPeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee, derp, derp, derp, you also a receptionist at a law firm? That makes two of you in the same forum. Who woulda thunk?

receptionist.gif
 
Yakuda said:
The "lawyer" there says the prosecutor brought in the liar Cohn to testify to "incontrovertible" evidence of Trump's crime. Why would such evidence of need a liar to testify to it's veracity?
Click to expand...
You aren't dealing with a lawyer, or a Judge in this case. It is nothing more than election interference. Any real lawyers should be hanging their heads in disgrace as to how far their chosen profession has sunk.
 
Lionfish said:
QPeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee, derp, derp, derp, you also a receptionist at a law firm? That makes two of you in the same forum. Who woulda thunk?
Click to expand...
So do you think Sniffles will commit to a pre debate drug test when debates is when his sniffles are the worst?

 
Lionfish said:
image-835-jpeg.1569520


Drug test for both debate candidates? Yes, or No Wally
Click to expand...
Standard evasion.

The argument of the thread is Trump did what he is charged with, had sex with Daniels and paid her to cover it up in order to keep voters from knowing about it. Cohen's personal shortcomings are something else. Nor is his testimony the only evidence. But attacking him seems to be the
only answer, poor as it is, you people can muster.
 
QP! said:
So do you think Sniffles will commit to a pre debate drug test when debates is when his sniffles are the worst?

Click to expand...
QPeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee, derp, derp, derp, So I can add you to the list of moonbat lefties that think there is no need for either of the candidates to take a drug test before or after the debate. Ever consider the fact that ONE of these two characters currently has the nuke codes?
You fuckers are comedy gold.
 
Lionfish said:
QPeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee, derp, derp, derp, So I can add you to the list of moonbat lefties that think there is no need for either of the candidates to take a drug test before or after the debate. Ever consider the fact that ONE of these two characters currently has the nuke codes?
You fuckers are comedy gold.
Click to expand...
Ya but the problem you have is that, as always, you are lying.

I am fine with them both taking a public drug test so we can get to see the drug cocktail that sniffles takes before his debates.

Why are you against that?
 
QP! said:
Ya but the problem you have is that, as always, you are lying.

I am fine with them both taking a public drug test so we can get to see the drug cocktail that sniffles takes before his debates.

Why are you against that?
Click to expand...
QPeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee, derp, derp, derp,

Thanks, I will remove you from the list of those leftie moonbats that do not support a drug test for both candidates.
BTW, don't try your usual deflection, it is no secret where I stand but good try anyway.
 
Walt said:
Let's remember what trump's defense is:
he claims he never had sex with Daniels, did not pay her hush money through Cohen, and therefore did not need to have records falsified.

Does anyone believe any part of that? Of course not. The best his crazy supporters can come up with is that trump falsifying business records is somehow legal.
Click to expand...

Back to reality - any semblance of a "case" by Bragg was sunk yesterday.

Three failures to lynch Trump - one to go...
 
Lionfish said:
QPeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee, derp, derp, derp,

Thanks, I will remove you from the list of those leftie moonbats that do not support a drug test for both candidates.
BTW, don't try your usual deflection, it is no secret where I stand but good try anyway.
Click to expand...
It is a secret where you stand, which is why you won't state it despite my many requests.

So again, 'are you ok with sniffles taking a drug test despite the fact it seems clear they up his drug cocktail prior to any of these debates?'
 
Walt said:
Let's remember what trump's defense is:
he claims he never had sex with Daniels, did not pay her hush money through Cohen, and therefore did not need to have records falsified.

Does anyone believe any part of that? Of course not. The best his crazy supporters can come up with is that trump falsifying business records is somehow legal.
Click to expand...
Attempted force of negative proof fallacy.
 
Nomad said:
Trump told over 30,000 documented lies, half truths and misstatements of fact during his four years in office.

Yet you think he should be believed and not Cohen.
Click to expand...
Argument from randU fallacy.
Learn what 'fact' means. It does not mean 'Universal Truth'.
 
Cypress said:
Post a link to a reputable news source which has corroborated evidence Biden cheated on his wife

When Clinton got a consensual blowjob you conservatives hollered from the rooftops that morality mattered in the presidency.

There is not an honest person of character on the planet who will claim Biden is just as sleazy and immoral as Trump.
Click to expand...
So you like Biden's hairy legs?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top