Even trumpers do not believe trump's defense

There is no issue here because Trump admitted the money was hush money payments he was reimbursing Cohen for. We have that on the record and it has already been presented to the jury despite Trumps latter attempt to lie about it.

there simply is no denying it.
hush money for sex isn't illegal.

that 's the basis of the Clinton Founation.
 
The fact trump was too much of a pussy to take the stand will resonate with the jury.
No one believes trump's defense. trump needs the jury to come up with a defense for him. It would have been good for him if he could have told the jury a defense. The problem is the defense he would have said would have been perjury for him.
 
Dr. Jill's ex husband says she and Brandon were having an affair during his marriage to Jill the ho.

Jill Biden was married to Bill Stevenson, who owned a college bar. Stevenson had multiple affairs with workers at his bar, so Jill Biden divorced him. She became legally separated in 1974, and first met Joe Biden in 1975. You may say that they met before Jill Biden's final divorce settlement, but it was definitely after the legal separation. And that is only when the met.
 
The Clinton Foundation is a charity. If they are paying hush money, that would be VERY ILLEGAL!!! And more importantly did not happen.
all charities are hush money.

to get poor people to shut up about the inherent fascism of our world.
 
Let's remember what trump's defense is:
he claims he never had sex with Daniels, did not pay her hush money through Cohen, and therefore did not need to have records falsified.

Does anyone believe any part of that? Of course not. The best his crazy supporters can come up with is that trump falsifying business records is somehow legal.
Hush money is not a crime, so it's irrelevant. Where's the crime?
 
8qrtsl.jpg
Trump has never been even charged with rape
 
Do you believe trump's claims that he did not have sex with Daniels, and did not pay her hush money?

I doubt even you believe trump's defense. That brings me back to my point, no one believes trump on this.
RQAA.
Illiteracy: Proper nouns are always capitalized.
 
It was a difficult situation. Had trump taken the stand, he would have said his defense that no one believes, and would have been on the hook for perjury. he did not take the stand, so there is only one narrative in front of the jury.
The 5th amendment is not a crime.
 
No one believes trump's defense. trump needs the jury to come up with a defense for him. It would have been good for him if he could have told the jury a defense. The problem is the defense he would have said would have been perjury for him.
conversely, nobody believe trump's crime.
 
There is no issue here because Trump admitted the money was hush money payments he was reimbursing Cohen for. We have that on the record and it has already been presented to the jury despite Trumps latter attempt to lie about it.

there simply is no denying it.
Not a crime.
 
Back
Top