Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
I'll let you answer this question first. LOL
What question?
No link, Right?
I'll let you answer this question first. LOL
It's not that the news was 'more true'. It wasn't possible to fact check the bullshit that Washington was releasing. See Vietnam casualty numbers as exhibit 1.It was nice being able to tune in to the evening news and get the true story from men like Walter Cronkite. Sadly those days are long gone.
What question?
No link, Right?
It's not that the news was 'more true'. It wasn't possible to fact check the bullshit that Washington was releasing. See Vietnam casualty numbers as exhibit 1.
That I'm "on board with 100% accuracy"?
Yep - as a gauge for whether something is fake news or not.
Next?
Your opinion. Next?
So you think it’s the end of the beginning, finally?
CNN has no choice but to make stuff up, their numbers are in the tank. No ne believes anything they say anyway.
Americans are not stupid, we see what they are doing, they literally spent 7 straight days spinning the "hot news" being Trump used the word shithole.
I can only imagine the rest of the world sees what they are doing also.
They are at war with Trump. Period. News, actual news means nothing to them. Otherwise we might actually see some from time to time.
Entertainment tonight should be worried, a competing show with competing stories has a better time slot than they do.
CNN.... Shithole news Network
Originally Posted by Althea It's not that the news was 'more true'. It wasn't possible to fact check the bullshit that Washington was releasing. See Vietnam casualty numbers as exhibit 1./QUOTE said:WTF do you know about Vietnam? No government accurately reports casualty figures. That is telling the enemy how you are doing!
Below is the full list of winners of the 2017 Fake News Awards.
1) The New York Times’ Paul Krugman claiming markets would ‘never’ recover from Trump presidency
2) ABC News' Brian Ross’ bungled report on former national security adviser Michael Flynn
3) CNN report that the Trump campaign had early access to hacked documents from WikiLeaks
4) TIME report that Trump removed a bust of Martin Luther King, Jr. from the Oval Office
5) The Washington Post’s Dave Weigel tweeting that Trump’s December rally in Pensacola, Florida, wasn’t packed with supporters
6) CNN’s video suggesting Trump overfed fish during visit with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe
7) CNN’s retracted report claiming Anthony Scaramucci-Russia ties
8) Newsweek report that Polish First Lady Agata Kornhauser-Duda did not shake Trump’s hand
9) CNN report that former FBI Director James Comey would dispute President Trump’s claim he was told he was not under investigation
10) The New York Times report that the Trump administration had hidden a climate-change report
11) In Trump’s words, "‘RUSSIA COLLUSION!’ Russian collusion is perhaps the greatest hoax perpetrated on the American people. THERE IS NO COLLUSION!”
No - that was your opinion. You implied that you agreed w/ the concept that any news organization which issues corrections is "fake news".
Are you not saying that? If so, I apologize for misinterpreting, and welcome your agreement that the list in the OP is bogus.
If any news org. has to issue corrections 3, 4, 5 times over a short period of 3,4 or 5 months....they are fake news.....
Take the case of CNN's Dr. Grupa, flatly stating over and over that Trump has heart disease in absolute terms....thats a lie, plain and simple....thats FAKE NEWS....
Its one man's opinion in spite of the facts....
Anyone can make a mistake, but news orgs. have a obligation to fact check, as many times as it takes, to prove what they are saying has merit....not take the word
of some anonymous source as gospel....especially when that source refuses to identify
themselves or might or has an obvious motive to embellish a story that seems to be nothing more than
character assassination....
So you are misinterpreting and generalizing to make your own opinions appear more credible....
And please don't tell me how much you think Trump 'lies' to justify your argument.....its totally irrelevant, this is about news organizations.....
No - that was your opinion. You implied that you agreed w/ the concept that any news organization which issues corrections is "fake news".
Are you not saying that? If so, I apologize for misinterpreting, and welcome your agreement that the list in the OP is bogus.
If any news org. has to issue corrections 3, 4, 5 times over a short period of 3,4 or 5 months....they are fake news.....
Take the case of CNN's Dr. Grupa, flatly stating over and over that Trump has heart disease in absolute terms....thats a lie, plain and simple....thats FAKE NEWS....
Its one man's opinion in spite of the facts....
Anyone can make a mistake, but news orgs. have a obligation to fact check, as many times as it takes, to prove what they are saying has merit....not take the word
of some anonymous source as gospel....especially when that source refuses to identify
themselves or might or has an obvious motive to embellish a story that seems to be nothing more than
character assassination....
So you are misinterpreting and generalizing to make your own opinions appear more credible....
And please don't tell me how much you think Trump 'lies' to justify your argument.....its totally irrelevant, this is about news organizations.....
Your opinion that I implied that.