For you idiots, the alleged crimes!

[Truth Detector]

Don't do the crime and you won't do the time.

What crime?

 

[Walt]

Trump could have told him to pound sand. But instead, he authorized payment on Cohen's invoices even grossing them up for tax purposes

You just confessed that trump is guilty of "grossing up" fake payments for tax purposes, which is felony falsifying business records.

It is funny that you deny everything but the felony.

 

[Truth Detector]

Another self own. Why would anyone take your advice when you don't do so yourself? LMAO

Run along little troll. You add nothing t any thread discourse.

 

[NakedHunterBiden]

Run along little troll. You add nothing t any thread discourse.

Gets more comfortable

 

[Walt]

Apparently, you know nothing about the law. Paying NDA money is not illegal and done all the time by people and businesses. It isn't "hush" money. That's a dumb leftist meme. Listing it as a LEGAL expense is not illegal. Grossing it up for tax purposes is not illegal and done all the time.

When you gross someone's pay up, the IRS is getting their money from that individual. Apparently, you know nothing about how the IRS or tax system works either.

So you admit that trump used business money for a personal/political NDA, and not for a business expense?

 

[NakedHunterBiden]

What crime?

Huurr Hurrr Hurrr

 

[Walt]

He violated Article I, $7, 8, and 9 of the Constitution of the State of New York, and the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th Amendments of the Constitution of the United States, he tainted the jury, rendering their verdict useless, and is attempting to convict with no specification of crime.

RQAA

The specific crime is falsifying business records.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Merchan's jury instructions sound a lot like this:

“It is not necessary to accept everything as true, one must only accept it as necessary.'

“The right understanding of any matter and a misunderstanding of the same matter do not wholly exclude each other.”

― Franz Kafka, The Trial

 

[Walt]

What crime?

Falsifying business records.

 

[Truth Detector]

How is the jury "tainted"?

By allowing prejudicial and salacious testimony from Daniels for one.

By not allowing the defense to put an FEC professional on the stand to testify what constitutes election fraud.

By not allowing a former justice official to testify to his conversations with his client at the time, Cohen, and how he stated on numerous occasions he had nothing on Trump. Worse, then sending everyone out of the room to scold said official for daring to roll his eyes. Thin skinned I would say.

Lastly, he sustained every objection no matter how frivolous from the Prosecution while overruling every objection the defense made.

It was, indeed, a clown show.

 

[Truth Detector]

Because he said it, makes it so.

Just STFU you dumb thread troll.

 

[Truth Detector]

You just confessed that trump is guilty of "grossing up" fake payments for tax purposes, which is felony falsifying business records.

Grossing up for tax purposes isn't a crime you dimwitted know-nothing. Good lord. This is why I don't like arguing with uneducated fools.

How are they "fake" payments? That is a moronic statement.

It is funny that you deny everything but the felony.

It is funny that you don't know what a felony is.

 

[NakedHunterBiden]

Just STFU you dumb thread troll.

You repeating yourself over and over makes you sound like the troll here. You a mod? If not kindly get off my ass. Put me on ig if you don't like what I say. Have a day!

 

[Truth Detector]

So you admit that trump used business money for a personal/political NDA, and not for a business expense?

Using one's business money to pay an attorney is not illegal. NDAs are not illegal. They happen all the time. I wish you had a brain. Then we could have a coherent debate without having to lecture you on how the real world works most of the time.

 

[Walt]

Merchan's jury instructions sound a lot like this:

“It is not necessary to accept everything as true, one must only accept it as necessary.'

Reasonable advice. You do not have to accept a case is 100% true. You just have to be 99% sure of the important bits to find for the prosecution. You can even be 100% sure parts are a lie, as long as it is not important to the case.

 

[Truth Detector]

Huurr Hurrr Hurrr

As expected, you just like removing any doubt what a thread trolling ass clown you are. Got it.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Reasonable advice. You do not have to accept a case is 100% true. You just have to be 99% sure of the important bits to find for the prosecution. You can even be 100% sure parts are a lie, as long as it is not important to the case.

So, if you're say 97% sure you should acquit? How about 80% sure? How low will you set the Limbo pole?

 

[NakedHunterBiden]

As expected, you just like removing any doubt what a thread trolling ass clown you are. Got it.

Pointing out your ignorance does not make one a troll. You do not have to like my comments. Deal with it.

 

[Into the Night]

It was not a business expense. It had nothing to do with the business. It was not a legal fee.

It is a business expense.
He was paying a lawyer.

trump made the claim it was a personal expense, not a campaign expense, but that still is not a business expense.

Trump is correct.

You cannot just business expense personal spending, or even worse yet business expense campaign spending. It is a felony.

Not a crime. No such felony crime.

 

[Truth Detector]

The specific crime is falsifying business records.

Yet that was unproven. Falsifying business records is not a felony. It's a misdemeanor and in this case, one who was long past the Statute of Limitations.

If you are going to argue something, at least come with some factual understanding of the case.