For you idiots, the alleged crimes!

Into the Night said:
Assuming the jury votes to 'convict' in this way, an appeals court will likely just throw the whole pile of garbage out.
Click to expand...
This is absolutely correct.

I'll just make an additional note (for those who aren't aware) that a 'conviction' in this way is precisely the immediate goal of these kangaroo proceedings (and is, in a general sense, how lawfare operates). The Obama Regime knows full well that any 'conviction' in this way will later be overturned, but that will take time. In the meantime, they would get the opportunity to let their manipulative media hounds loose on the general public and scream "GUILTY! GUILTY! GUILTY!" for numerous news cycles, along with repeatedly planting the seed into people's minds that they shouldn't vote for a "convicted felon" for President.

By the time any appeals decision comes around, they will have already spent numerous news cycles manipulating the minds of the masses in the above manner. It's similar to how they will initially put out "good" jobs numbers, let that announcement run through the news cycle, and then later "revise" the numbers downward to hide the truth from the laypeople who don't know how that process works.

In this case, they ultimately want to manipulatively and repeatedly label Trump as a "convicted felon" before any potential election is held later this year. All the other lawfare cases aren't going well for them, so this lawfare case is their best bet of getting any sort of "guilty verdict" on Trump before November comes around.

TLDR: Lawfare is a construct for media consumption meant to manipulate public opinion. That's why Demonkkkrats only care about getting a "guilty verdict" from this kangaroo court, regardless of a higher court later overturning the ruling on appeal.
 
Last edited:
Truth Detector said:
Using one's business money to pay an attorney is not illegal.
Click to expand...
Using a business' money to pay personal expenses is a crime. The two are separate legal entities. A business' expenses are assumed to be business expenses for the IRS, and therefore business deductions.
 
Walt said:
Reasonable advice. You do not have to accept a case is 100% true. You just have to be 99% sure of the important bits to find for the prosecution. You can even be 100% sure parts are a lie, as long as it is not important to the case.
Click to expand...

That is a pile of nonsensical word salad. Wow! :palm:
 
Walt said:
Using a business' money to pay personal expenses is a crime.
Click to expand...

Really? List the code that says paying personal expenses is a crime.

Walt said:
The two are separate legal entities. A business' expenses are assumed to be business expenses for the IRS, and therefore business deductions.
Click to expand...

Trump wasn't paying personal expenses. He was paying legal fees. I know you want to pontificate and argue a strawman, but that is weak and stupid.

It was an expense before taxes for Trump's company, and taxable income for Cohen who received the money. IRS is A OKAY with that.
 
Walt said:
So the business records were falsified
Click to expand...
Specification?
Walt said:
by accident?
Click to expand...
Irrelevance fallacy.
Walt said:
Giuffre's employment records were all "lost" by accident? The pool at marlo-lardo was accidentally emptied into the server room?
Click to expand...
New York has no jurisdiction in Florida. Your random rants are not part of the case.
Walt said:
You are describing trump as an extremely incompetent businessman.
Click to expand...
He did no such thing. Trump is a very competent businessman. You can't stand that, can you? :laugh:
 
NakedHunterBiden said:
Pointing out your ignorance does not make one a troll. You do not have to like my comments. Deal with it.
Click to expand...

You sad caricature of ignorance and stupidity, you're only pointing out your own glaring ignorance and stupidity. :laugh:

Of course, you would need a brain to comprehend the obvious. Stupid people simply don't know they are stupid people.
 
Truth Detector said:
Yet that was unproven. Falsifying business records is not a felony. It's a misdemeanor and in this case, one who was long past the Statute of Limitations.

If you are going to argue something, at least come with some factual understanding of the case.
Click to expand...
So you are admitting that trump is guilty of a crime, but claim that the statute of limitations on that crime has run out. So much for the claim he is not charged with a specific crime. I guess that claim is gone.

You feel trump's crime was not a felony. Why do you suppose he made it a business expense paid for by a separate corporation? Why not pay Cohen himself?
 
Truth Detector said:
You sad caricature of ignorance and stupidity, you're only pointing out your own glaring ignorance and stupidity. :laugh:

Of course, you would need a brain to comprehend the obvious. Stupid people simply don't know they are stupid people.
Click to expand...
Apparently...great job magat
 
Walt said:
So you are admitting that trump is guilty of a crime, but claim that the statute of limitations on that crime has run out. So much for the claim he is not charged with a specific crime. I guess that claim is gone.
Click to expand...

Lie, lame and stupid. I am saying that even if that were the crime, which it is not, Bragg could not use it because it is simply a misdemeanor and long past the Statute of Limitations.

Did you get through High School? I am beginning to think you haven't or you have a severe reading comprehension problem.

Walt said:
You feel trump's crime was not a felony.
Click to expand...

What crime? He didn't commit any crimes and Bragg never proved he had.

Walt said:
Why do you suppose he made it a business expense paid for by a separate corporation? Why not pay Cohen himself?
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter how he paid for his legal fees. He did pay Cohen, from his accounts. They were properly labled legal expenses. What part of the OBVIOUS are you having such a hard time with?

Bragg is trying to lift this to a felony through some underlying crime he never stated or proved. That's just the facts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top