No, but it points out that you were wrong. So it was more fun.Do you think you're second response the same post is better?
No, but it points out that you were wrong. So it was more fun.Do you think you're second response the same post is better?
oh no no no.... you are off the deep end.
Seriously, when did your debating skills fall off to the pathetic Lorax level?
They removed the part that discussed Clintons chances at getting Bin Laden.
I posted a link to the report and to the quote, the speech you refer to is not the speech in which it was stated.
No shit it was a disney movie.... and what caused disney to not only alter the movie by removing factual data, but also pressured them into not releasing it?
You fucking hack.
Oh, the "factual data" that included scenes of conversations that never took place regarding events that never actually happened between? That "factual data?"
Ugh. You two are brain-dead.
Actually, none of the people you are talking about were in a position to ban anything. I think the ire of your wrath should be focused on Disney.
LOL Zing...We now interrupt the meanderings of the United States of Amnesia, for this announcement:
Republicans threatened to boycott CBS if they showed a made for tv movie about the Reagans. CBS pulled the movie.
We now return you to your regularly scheduled “IT’S THE SF AND DAMO HACKSALOT SHOW”. Thank you.
LOL Zing...
Oh Noes... So, your argument is, "They do it too."
Thanks for playing.
And, when the repukes pissed their diapers over the CBS movie, and had it pulled, that wasn't censorship either. That was the cry babies using the market to pressure an entity into doing what they wanted. That entity, caved. And that is on CBS.
The Disney thing, was similar, except that, you know, that film was a right wing hit job.
SF did you need a link to the CBS story?
LOL Zing...
Oh Noes... So, your argument is, "They do it too."
Thanks for playing.
No, but it points out that you were wrong. So it was more fun.
And, when the repukes pissed their diapers over the CBS movie, and had it pulled, that wasn't censorship either. That was the cry babies using the market to pressure an entity into doing what they wanted. That entity, caved. And that is on CBS.
The Disney thing, was similar, except that, you know, that film was a right wing hit job.
SF did you need a link to the CBS story?
No need. I'm sure he found it very "amusing" when Republicans did it, like they really "put one over" on the networks.
I am Roberto Duran right now (old sports/boxing reference)...no mas...no mas...
I simply can't take this level of stupidity on a daily basis anymore.
It would depend on if he changed action in the future. If he stepped away from it by either simply losing a public battle and not repeating it or simply stating directly that it was in error, then yeah. I'd agree that it could have been a learning curve issue.Anyhoo. score 1 one for you.
But on to other matters.
Do you accept that this is just a good learning experience for Obama? The same excuse you gave for Palin "learning about" book banning?
It would depend on if he changed action in the future. If he stepped away from it by either simply losing a public battle and not repeating it, then yeah. I'd agree that it could have been a learning curve issue.
Actually I remember that, you are right. And the argument was then from the left it was censorship, from the right that it wasn't. Now it's come full circle.Ohh yeah thanks for the memory jog. According to the Rebutlickens it was all a corporate decision not politics at all.
My my how they flop all over the place.
Actually I remember that, you are right. And the argument was then from the left it was censorship, from the right that it wasn't. Now it's come full circle.
For the record, I do not think that it is censorship to apply pressure to change a corporate action if it isn't done by the government. It is simply a corporation responding to their customers' wishes.
I'll bet we can actually find the "Censorship" thread.