How To Explain Gay Rights To An Idiot

bravo said:
More like a robust discussion to me.....something you're totally unfamiliar with.

You're only good for snide put downs and personal one liners about the posters.
Click to expand...

LOL

That's hysterical. Directed at you, sure. I talk to smart people here all of the time. You're an idiot. Worse, you're such a hate-filled bigot.
 
Eye said:
you quoted the LINK....VIRUSESSESS ARE COMING!!!!!
Click to expand...

LOL

You realize you stepped in it. That's cool.

All I know is that I picked up a nasty virus this past year - almost impossible to get rid of. My helpdesk asked me where I went, and also asked me if I posted any external links on any websites.

That's enough for me.
 
Eye said:
still no virus

:)
Click to expand...

But you didn't answer the question. If the link I referred to, and which you posted, backed up that I was correct, and you said that I only linked when I knew I was right...why wouldn't I have posted the link itself?
 
Onceler said:
LOL

You realize you stepped in it. That's cool.

All I know is that I picked up a nasty virus this past year - almost impossible to get rid of. My helpdesk asked me where I went, and also asked me if I posted any external links on any websites.

That's enough for me.
Click to expand...

i love how you lie and claim i realize i stepped in it by continuing to MOCK you

you get the virus by visiting the webpage, not linking it.
 
Onceler said:
Have you linked your quote?

I don't link - it can invite viruses. But, if you're going to talk about the topic with such "expertise," and ridicule what others say about it, it seems the least you could do is a couple of google searches, or a little wikipedia research. Every source I checked yesterday when you were asking said that marriage pre-dates recorded history. When I mentioned this to you, you said there was no way to know that - which, speaking from an anthropological point of view (as I did study anthropology in general), is complete BS. Half of our knowledge of history in general is based on educated guessing.
Click to expand...


More like ALL of YOUR knowledge is based on guessing, the "educated" part is suspect......guessing is not knowledge......that how Bush got into trouble(the NIE ?)

So let me look at wikipedia and see what they say if you refuse to prove your crap with a link......
 
Onceler said:
But you didn't answer the question. If the link I referred to, and which you posted, backed up that I was correct, and you said that I only linked when I knew I was right...why wouldn't I have posted the link itself?
Click to expand...

you spelled out exactly where the link is retard. same thing.

:palm:
 
Onceler said:
LOL

You realize you stepped in it. That's cool.

All I know is that I picked up a nasty virus this past year - almost impossible to get rid of. My helpdesk asked me where I went, and also asked me if I posted any external links on any websites.

That's enough for me.
Click to expand...

Really? I've known others who said they got viruses that way. I don't click on any links from people who I am suspicious of here.
 
wanderingbear said:
Gay rights is about gays having the same rights as everyone else..
Click to expand...

No, they want the special rights reserved for heterosexual couples, the only couples who procreate. Make marriage available to any two consenting adults AND THEN they would have the same rights as anybody else.
 
Eye said:
you spelled out exactly where the link is retard. same thing.

:palm:
Click to expand...

It's not. I don't link for a reason, which I explained. You think it's because of you, which is pretty narcissistic. Dano used to be like that.

I've been pretty consistent on it since I got that virus. It crashed everyting I had for days. I don't see a real need to link when the info is available to everyone on the internet with a quick search.
 
Darla said:
LOL

That's hysterical. Directed at you, sure. I talk to smart people here all of the time. You're an idiot. Worse, you're such a hate-filled bigot.
Click to expand...

You're really gonna have to find some new phrases. We're all getting tired of the "hate-filled bigot" crap all day long every day from you and your friends. Let's get back to the old American custom of vigorous honest debate and stop the bomb throwing. Let's see if you can make a coherent rational argument.
 
Darla said:
Really? I've known others who said they got viruses that way. I don't click on any links from people who I am suspicious of here.
Click to expand...

Yeah - they didn't know if that was specifically how I got it, but just the fact that they asked was enough. I don't click on links I don't trust here, either. It really made things pretty miserable for me for a few days....
 
Onceler said:
It's true, at least according to my helpdesk. Here - do some work: just go to wikipedia, and type in "marriage." In the 1st paragraph of "origins," it states that marriage pre-dates recorded history.

If you search on "marriage and recorded history," you will find at least 6 links on the 1st page that comes up with studies talking about that.

Does that help?
Click to expand...

I think that you've been linking to too much porn. That's giving you the viruses, not some wiki article.

Seriously man. I hired a guy who just spent two years in club fed and the first thing he did when I set up his computer was to surf porn sites. We nearly had to toss the computer in the trash it had so many viruses on it.
 
DamnYankee said:
I think that you've been linking to too much porn. That's giving you the viruses, not some wiki article.

Seriously man. I hired a guy who just spent two years in club fed and the first thing he did when I set up his computer was to surf porn sites. We nearly had to toss the computer in the trash it had so many viruses on it.
Click to expand...

I don't go near porn - you are quite correct on that...
 
Onceler said:
That's why I checked out other searches. If you'd like to learn something about the topic, you can do that too.
Click to expand...


So whats your point.......enlighten me, tell me what anthropologists say about WHY the institution was created from the beginning....

other than bloodline, children, women, and division of property.......

What is your point in all this .....? And how does it defend your "marriage for homos" defense...
 
I think we had a good victory today against the libtards and their constant attack on marriage. But tomorrow they will be back, pretending that they weren't defeated.
 
bravo said:
So whats your point.......enlighten me, tell me what anthropologists say about WHY the institution was created from the beginning....

other than bloodline, children, women, and division of property.......

What is your point in all this .....? And how does it defend your "marriage for homos" defense...
Click to expand...

I don't think the origins of marriage are relevant, because we rarely use the origins of anything as a gauge for how the current model should be. Like I said, most early civilizations were characterized by brutality, oppression & superstition - hardly a good starting point for American law in the 21st century.

I addressed it because YOU brought it up, and kept asking. I actually asked you why you thought the origins were relevant, and you said we'd "get to the relevancy later."

So...can we get to the relevancy now?
 
Darla said:
Really? I've known others who said they got viruses that way. I don't click on any links from people who I am suspicious of here.
Click to expand...

note the key action. you don't get viruses by linking a site, you get the virus by visiting the site.

i have never heard of simply typing in a website address, say www.google.com, and that alone gives you a virus.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top