PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
Again, the market itself would change to reflect the change in reality. They would pay more for their health insurance, simple as that.
My post, in answer to yours, was pointing out the bipolar reasoning that companies that provide insurance are smart enough to figure out cost effective ways to provide insurance but not smart enough to handle large families is a bipolar argument that leads to circular reasoning.
Either start arguing that the government should run the companies, or continue arguing that the companies, and the market, would adjust to a different reality. You can't have it both ways.
if the market attempted to limit how many of one's legal spouses could be covered by a health insurance plan, certainly someone would sue claiming discrimination against families larger than "x".....therefore, all our policies would have to go up in cost to cover the possibility than we would get married 41 more times......either way, there is an impact upon all individuals if the law changes.....