Is Covfefe / Rana still a mod?

Yaya said:
You cannot stop talking about Top and now you're obsessed with Yurt.

Freak!
Click to expand...

fatguyinspandex-1-01.jpg


16063195165_f895245d69_o.jpg
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Been there and done that; but all you do is keep repeating your denials and failing to accept facts.

There's nothing to argue, when you've decided to shut down your limited cognitive abilities.
Click to expand...

So because Guille said it, it must be true. Guess that means you're really a gossipy old woman because Guille said so.

USF...what's up with you and 12b? What's your deal? Today wasn't the first time you've given a "warning" about 12b. Funny thing is every time you've done it with me child porn wasn't involved at all...until you introduced the idea.

And...I don't see anything in your avatar to suggest you're staff. Are you? Or are you just a little jock sniffing bitch who likes to transfer your weaknesses onto others and then complain to the mods?

Either way, you drop that bomb...you need to explain yourself you gutless little cunt.
Click to expand...

4 different threads now USF, you sick little bitch. You've got no excuse. Get in here and tell me what you did you sick twisted little cunt.
Click to expand...

So, you are now saying that you didn't have anything to do with anything and you...on your own...decided to classify what I said as innuendo and warn me based on a completely different thread? I don't believe you.

Well:

-- I do believe the mods don't give a fuck about you.

-- I don't believe you didn't try to contact them.

-- Even if you did nothing at all as you claim you're still a sick fuck for letting your mind go 12b. This isn't the first time you've done that. Stop it, your fucked up kink is your own. You deal with it, stop trying to transfer it to other people you sick little bitch.

Are we clear on this? Just go fuck yourself from now on you sick little cunt.
Click to expand...

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?81008-USF-why-are-you-so-fascinated&highlight=Rana
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
I've already posted the proof that Guille provided.
Are you saying that Guille lied; because where's your proof of that??

I see you've decided to go "full on denial", regarding Rana's behavior.

Is this your way of trying to get back into her approval?
Click to expand...

Guille also claimed you were a two-faced little jock sniffing bitch so if I have to believe he's telling the truth about Rana, then I have to believe he's telling the truth about you also.

What makes you think I was ever out of Rana's approval?
 
ZappasGuitar said:
"Get back into her approval"?!?

WTF does that even mean?

It's no wonder the state of Arizona lets you work with kids.

You've got the mental development of your average pre-teen.
Click to expand...

Lol. Last night I read this line and immediately thought of freedumb. "...he was too stupid to legally qualify as a human being..." :D
 
christiefan915 said:
So because Guille said it, it must be true. Guess that means you're really a gossipy old woman because Guille said so.

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?81008-USF-why-are-you-so-fascinated&highlight=Rana
Click to expand...

Um.... so let me see if I got this right. USF is accusing Rana of being in league with someone to get USF banned, based on the words of this Guille person who obviously loathes USF according to his own words? Wow. And we thought Amazon was a mess!
 
christiefan915 said:
So because Guille said it, it must be true. Guess that means you're really a gossipy old woman because Guille said so.


https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?81008-USF-why-are-you-so-fascinated&highlight=Rana
Click to expand...

Good lord, there is something really wrong with this USF gal.

I chalk it all up to the girlish gossip righwingers evidently love to engage in via PM.....gossip that is mostly a collection of lies, slanderous innuendo, and washerwoman chatter.

I have always said that when message board gossip and innuendo become an important part of one's life, it is time to take stock, to self-reflect...and perhaps to seek mental health counseling!
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Toxic thinks Rana is "biased" because Toxic has tried repeatedly to get me banned for this and that and the other, and blames Rana for it not happening. Now she has reason to be down on Grind as well. Last week she snitched to the mods that I had revealed "personal info" about her on JPP.... her town. Unfortunately for her, she herself had revealed the name of the town when she got to talking to Mott the Hoople, who lives in the same general area. They exchanged several posts about the wonders of the suburb, little shops, parks, bike trails, etc. So oops -- no banning was done.
Click to expand...

1) I just want to clarify that you are assuming TOP reported you on something. This has never been confirmed or even touched upon, just an assumption on your part.

2) as far as rana not banning anyone, when it comes to bans at least 2 mods must sign on (and typically 3 to make us all feel good about it) and it takes all mods to perma ban someone.
 
christiefan915 said:
Guille also claimed you were a two-faced little jock sniffing bitch so if I have to believe he's telling the truth about Rana, then I have to believe he's telling the truth about you also.

What makes you think I was ever out of Rana's approval?
Click to expand...

I never saw or read him making such an accusation; but since I've provided your request for his accusation against Rana, can you now provide proof of the accusation you're accusing him of making??
 
Cypress said:
Good lord, there is something really wrong with this USF gal.

I chalk it all up to the girlish gossip righwingers evidently love to engage in via PM.....gossip that is mostly a collection of lies, slanderous innuendo, and washerwoman chatter.

I have always said that when message board gossip and innuendo become an important part of one's life, it is time to take stock, to self-reflect...and perhaps to seek mental health counseling!
Click to expand...

Aren't you supposed to be busy cyber stalking someone, again?? :D
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Toxic thinks Rana is "biased" because Toxic has tried repeatedly to get me banned for this and that and the other, and blames Rana for it not happening. Now she has reason to be down on Grind as well. Last week she snitched to the mods that I had revealed "personal info" about her on JPP.... her town. Unfortunately for her, she herself had revealed the name of the town when she got to talking to Mott the Hoople, who lives in the same general area. They exchanged several posts about the wonders of the suburb, little shops, parks, bike trails, etc. So oops -- no banning was done.
Click to expand...

Royal Highness said:
1) I just want to clarify that you are assuming TOP reported you on something. This has never been confirmed or even touched upon, just an assumption on your part.

2) as far as rana not banning anyone, when it comes to bans at least 2 mods must sign on (and typically 3 to make us all feel good about it) and it takes all mods to perma ban someone.
Click to expand...

Since Owl has made this "reporting" comment, several other times, are you saying she's lying!!

:facepalm:
 
I am not saying she is "lying," perhaps more mistaken, but I just wanted to clarify for the general board, especially because so many amazonions are new here, that while I did address a report that came up with her, she is assuming it was top that reported the post, and I am saying that I never mentioned who reported the post .

People can obviously make inferences when we discuss reports on here, but that's all they are in the end. Many would be surprised to find that we often have liberals reporting liberals and conservatives reporting other conservatives. We actually do have some principled people here.
 
Royal Highness said:
I am not saying she is "lying," perhaps more mistaken, but I just wanted to clarify for the general board, especially because so many amazonions are new here, that while I did address a report that came up with her, she is assuming it was top that reported the post, and I am saying that I never mentioned who reported the post .

People can obviously make inferences when we discuss reports on here, but that's all they are in the end. Many would be surprised to find that we often have liberals reporting liberals and conservatives reporting other conservatives. We actually do have some principled people here.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the clarification, Grind.
I only replied to your other post; because Owl has accused Top of making NUMEROUS reports against her and this means that they were just accusations and not fact. :good4u:
 
Royal Highness said:
1) I just want to clarify that you are assuming TOP reported you on something. This has never been confirmed or even touched upon, just an assumption on your part.
2) as far as rana not banning anyone, when it comes to bans at least 2 mods must sign on (and typically 3 to make us all feel good about it) and it takes all mods to perma ban someone.
Click to expand...

Yes, you are correct that I'm assuming that it was Toxic due to her constant bragging about it here and her statements that when someone has been removed, it was my account, or Mason's. None of the mods have mentioned it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top