Is It Time To Take Up Arms?

SmilinJack said:
Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaa like to spin eh? heh heh da libtards are the ones coming out on the short end of the stick in regards to this controversy and it is plain to see.

aka....anytime someone starts playing the race card....accusing their opponent of racism they have ceded the field as in admitting defeat.
Click to expand...


if you say so.
 
putsometrebleinit said:
Ahhhh the good ole Scandinavian socialist model argument. I think that it would be better to say that they do well despite socialism, not because of it. High taxes and an extensive welfare state don't exactly make them socialist. The Scandinavian countries have just as much, if not more market freedom than we do in the United States with very similar government spending with regards to the GDP.

When you look at their average gross and net incomes they all fall short of the US as well. And since there is a big difference in the population of the United States and these nations it would do better to compare individual states with these countries, and the Scandinavian countries would rank among the poorest States if they were a part of the United States when looking at per capita GDP.

Another factor that comes into play is the demographics of the countries. The Scandinavian nations have a highly homogenous population compared to the United States and there have been plenty of studies supporting the fact that high immigration rates have an effect on poverty rates.

And it will be interesting to see how these countries fare when the declining working population finally hits bottom because Denmark is already facing issues with that as well as some of those other countries you listed.

And if welfare produced prosperity then we should have no issues with poverty at all considering the trillions of dollars spent since the war on poverty started but the fact is that poverty has remained relatively flat while welfare spending has risen. The answer is to stimulate economic growth with a truly free market rather than let the government have its hand in everything and tax us to death.
Click to expand...

Excellent; and lets also not forget that nations like Finland, Canada, Sweden, Norway and New Zealand have vast natural resources and tiny homogenous populations.

The only country on that list that exceeds the per capita GDP of America is Norway; China ranks 93rd.

What a desperate and foolish argument the leftists have to make to prop up their ideological failures.
 
"whensoever any portion of the States, or people thereof attempt to secede from the Federal Union, or forcibly resist the Execution of its laws, the Federal Government may, by warrant of the Constitution, employ armed force in compelling obedience to its Authority."

From Section 2 of the Constitution of Nevada.
 
"the Paramount Allegiance of every citizen is due to the Federal Government in the exercise of all its Constitutional powers as the same have been or may be defined by the Supreme Court of the United States;"

ROTFLOL

I am enjoying my first reading of the Constitution of Nevada.
 
Jarod said:
"the Paramount Allegiance of every citizen is due to the Federal Government in the exercise of all its Constitutional powers as the same have been or may be defined by the Supreme Court of the United States;"

ROTFLOL

I am enjoying my first reading of the Constitution of Nevada.
Click to expand...
and when the federal government is outside the constitution? are the residents of nevada still so compelled?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
and when the federal government is outside the constitution? are the residents of nevada still so compelled?
Click to expand...


It says... "As defined by the Supreme Court of the United States."

So as long as the Supreme Court considers the actions of the Federal Government Constitutional... Residents of Nevada's paramount allegiance is due to the Federal Government.
 
Jarod said:
"whensoever any portion of the States, or people thereof attempt to secede from the Federal Union, or forcibly resist the Execution of its laws, the Federal Government may, by warrant of the Constitution, employ armed force in compelling obedience to its Authority."

From Section 2 of the Constitution of Nevada.
Click to expand...

bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaa I prefer the Declaration of Independence but that is just me. heh heh

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation."

BTW do you know how many English Laws the founders broke when they declared independence?
 
Supreme Court Rulings That Show The BLM has violated the constitution

Who dat say sumptin bout dat Supreme Ct. in Washington? heh heh

fr. the following link

"The Supreme Court has ruled multiple times on the federal government having too much state land. It is called the equal footing doctrine and it is time that Nevada and all the other states that are buried under from too much federal presence get it enforced. This would bring about a major shift in the west and give the states more freedom for development. This will also mean less need for federal intrusion there."


Read and weep all you misguided libtards>>>>>>>http://misguidedchildren.com/domestic-affairs/2014/04/supreme-court-rulings-that-the-west-should-remember/19123
 
SmarterthanYou said:
when the law violates or exceeds the constitution, it is null and void.
Click to expand...

I'm afraid I'm going to need something a little more substantive than your say so.

You think a law violates or exceeds the constitution?

Then do like everyone else and WORK TO CHANGE THE LAW.

Simply whining about it isn't acceptable.
 
Jarod said:
What rights of individual citizens have been infringed upon here? Are you arguing that Cliven Bundy has a personal right to use Federal land for his business?
Click to expand...


Bundy is just a welfare queen in a 10 gallon hat.

He monetarily benefited from grazing his cattle on land belonging to WE The PEOPLE.
 
Rich people demanding welfare with an automatic rifle.... Patriot.

Poor people looking for food stamps... Lazy scumbag full of entitlement.
 
Jarod said:
Article IV, Section 3, Paragraph 2....

The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State.
Click to expand...

uh oh.
 
SmilinJack said:
Bullshit>>>>>>>>from the following link: "The second problem that the siege against Cliven Bundy illustrates is the unconstitutional police powers assumed by federal agencies such as the BLM. Originally, the only federal agency that was lawfully allowed to make arrests on behalf of the U.S. government was the U.S. Marshals Service, which was created back in 1789--the year that the U.S. Constitution was ratified. Today, there are scores of alphabet agencies of the federal government who carry a badge and a gun and are allowed to enforce law at bayonet point. And the vast majority of these agencies are acting on assumed authority--authority not granted them constitutionally. Among these, there is no greater culprit than the BLM."




http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin802.htm
Click to expand...


Where does any of that refute what Jarod posted?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top