They did not send in troops to start pointing guns at this guys family. They sent officers to remove the cattle that was trespassing, the guy and his family pulled guns and the Feds retreated.
Do you have a cite that anything different happened?
Is It Time To Take Up Arms?
- Thread starter SmilinJack
- Start date
They did not send in troops to start pointing guns at this guys family. They sent officers to remove the cattle that was trespassing, the guy and his family pulled guns and the Feds retreated.
Do you have a cite that anything different happened?
The Court told them to remove the cattle... Gave them the authority, they had guns because Bundy and family had issued threats. Sounds reasonable to me. If I stopped paying for my car, I would bet money and expect that the repo guy who came to get it would be carrying.
So I should call my bank and tell them that I am going to start paying the old bank that used to hold my mortgage, and they better be oklay with that. If they try to evict me, they better not bring guns!
SmilinJack
Verified User
Telling the federalis you will defend your family and property is hardly a threat....get real.
and your ridiculous analogy makes you look a little stupid.
SmilinJack
Verified User
Someone else who makes ridiculous analogies....must run in the family. You boys just do not get it.....one more time...I hope it sticks this time because my patience with your ignorance has its limits.
WHEREAS the Constitution of the United States clearly authorizes the federal government to only own such land as is necessary for a seat of government and such land as is necessary for the erection of forts, docks and shipyards, etc.: (See the United States Constitution, Section 9, paragraph 17),
Got Dat? Deal wid it chumps.
http://www.petitiononline.com/lg2/petition.html
SmilinJack
Verified User
Naive much.....you should have a conversation with Randy Weaver.
Senator Reid is on record saying something was going to happen to Clive Bundy to stop him...sounds like a threat to me.
http://reason.com/archives/1993/10/01/ambush-at-ruby-ridge
SmilinJack
Verified User
What a dumbass.............and stop posting stuff out of context...you intentionally attempt to deceive...but I caught you this time and someone will catch you next time.
Now for the truth>>>>>>>>>http://hotair.com/archives/2014/04/14/nevada-rancher-i-did-not-graze-my-cattle-on-united-states-property/
SmilinJack
Verified User
Sir, With all due respect....do you not understand how simple minded you are?
Most stupid people have enough sense to shut up when their ignorance has been exposed. Must be that movie playing in your head....shuts out reality.
SmilinJack
Verified User
You obviously have difficulty understand law and this has already been covered....try and keep up or STFU got dat chump?
http://www.monacointelligenceservice.com/2014/04/congressman-bring-blm-into-compliance.html
Here is the deal for anyone interested in the truth>>>>
SmilinJack
Verified User
In your dreams asshole.
SmilinJack
Verified User
You damn right I say so you piece of shit.
Too bad you are not like most stupid people. Your ignorance has been exposed. Every single point you have made has been proven wrong, every link debunked, yet you blather on.
Here's the deal, retard; sell your clap trap bullshit elsewhere, no one is buying it here.
SmilinJack
Verified User
bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa I knew this dude had delusions of grandeur....git back to yo movie boy....yo watchin birth of a nation again? keeps you motivated eh? bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
SmilinJack
Verified User
Listen up libtards...you need to send in a pinch hitter for runny....he had to run. heh heh What a coward.
Where dat rune go? here rune? here rune? bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Where dat rune go? here rune? here rune? bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
SmilinJack
Verified User
Hey Rune....come on back I was jus joking....dont take it so hard.
Seriously;
1. You suck at debate.
2. You are proposing insurrection based upon a lie.
3. You are dumb as hell.
4. You totally lost.
5. You are committing treason and could be arrested and (thanks to neocons and the conservatards such as yourself that empowered them) held as an enemy combatant with no rights.
SmilinJack
Verified User
delusional much?
I am LMAO but seriously someone call a ambulance for dis here dud rune.
Jus jokin rune...dont go away. This is fun.
Last edited:
SmilinJack
Verified User
A friend sent me this:
NY Times Reporter Who Twisted Bundys Statement Is Radical Liberal Openly Gay Sodomite
His name is Adam Nagourney, a liberal Jew, who also is a radical openly gay sodomite who is now bureau chief at the NY Times Los Angeles section. He has a history of following the “progressive” Alisnky playbook of demonizing those against whom you can’t argue. His brother, Eric Nagourney, is also an editor and writer for The New York Times. I would only note that Bundy didn’t actually make any “racist” comments as Nagourney took his statements and twisted them out of context by selectively editing them. Instead, what Bundy he DID do that Nagourney refused to praise, was point out how terribly, terribly destructive that Democrats and the rest of the “progressive” movement have been for negroes over the past few decades. If there’s anything racist going on, it involves trapping negroes in a grinding cycle of poverty and despair, while psychologically bullying them into continuing to support the very people—the Democrats—who trapped them in the first place. But Adam Nagourney couldn't allow himself to point that out. No, when it comes to gay sodomite Nagourney, he knew exactly what he was doing. He knew by experience, if he put the story out, the knee jerk reponses from low information voters would overreact in this morally wrong politically correct climate without checking the facts and getting second hand sources. It worked............that is up until a point that it was found out that he deceived his readers. What he did was entrap Bundy and then immediately turned around and contacted politicians in support of him for a quick response before the facts could be verified causing them to distance themselves in a foolish manner. It worked. But nothing about Bundy changes the fact that the fedgov’s response to the situation was nothing other than thuggish intimidation and a violation of the spirit of the Posse Comitatus Act. Never the less, what we witnesses yesterday is the deception that gays pull all the time to get their way to further a insidious agenda and it is further proof that gays can't be trusted at all, especially around children. They should be denounced as a threat to society and our traditional Christian family value system.
NY Times Reporter Who Twisted Bundys Statement Is Radical Liberal Openly Gay Sodomite
His name is Adam Nagourney, a liberal Jew, who also is a radical openly gay sodomite who is now bureau chief at the NY Times Los Angeles section. He has a history of following the “progressive” Alisnky playbook of demonizing those against whom you can’t argue. His brother, Eric Nagourney, is also an editor and writer for The New York Times. I would only note that Bundy didn’t actually make any “racist” comments as Nagourney took his statements and twisted them out of context by selectively editing them. Instead, what Bundy he DID do that Nagourney refused to praise, was point out how terribly, terribly destructive that Democrats and the rest of the “progressive” movement have been for negroes over the past few decades. If there’s anything racist going on, it involves trapping negroes in a grinding cycle of poverty and despair, while psychologically bullying them into continuing to support the very people—the Democrats—who trapped them in the first place. But Adam Nagourney couldn't allow himself to point that out. No, when it comes to gay sodomite Nagourney, he knew exactly what he was doing. He knew by experience, if he put the story out, the knee jerk reponses from low information voters would overreact in this morally wrong politically correct climate without checking the facts and getting second hand sources. It worked............that is up until a point that it was found out that he deceived his readers. What he did was entrap Bundy and then immediately turned around and contacted politicians in support of him for a quick response before the facts could be verified causing them to distance themselves in a foolish manner. It worked. But nothing about Bundy changes the fact that the fedgov’s response to the situation was nothing other than thuggish intimidation and a violation of the spirit of the Posse Comitatus Act. Never the less, what we witnesses yesterday is the deception that gays pull all the time to get their way to further a insidious agenda and it is further proof that gays can't be trusted at all, especially around children. They should be denounced as a threat to society and our traditional Christian family value system.