Is It Time To Take Up Arms?

Here is something regarding the Bundy Controversy that I don't think has been discussed but it could explain why the BLM decided to use force instead of just going to court.

http://benswann.com/exclusive-does-cliven-bundy-have-something-called-prescriptive-rights-why-the-blm-may-be-afraid-of-going-to-court/


Guess what...it only took TWO SENTENCES to discover that yet another link from you is just NONSENSE.

SECOND sentence in the article...here's what I mean:

"For instance, in the 20 years Bundy hasn’t been paying his fees, why hasn’t he been taken to court?"

Answer:

HE HAS...FOUR SEPARATE TIMES.

He simply refuses to abide by the rulings of the court.

Okay, so go find another nutbar with a blog you think has a slant on this Bundy case that need to be posted.
 
Guess what...it only took TWO SENTENCES to discover that yet another link from you is just NONSENSE.

SECOND sentence in the article...here's what I mean:

"For instance, in the 20 years Bundy hasn’t been paying his fees, why hasn’t he been taken to court?"

Answer:

HE HAS...FOUR SEPARATE TIMES.

He simply refuses to abide by the rulings of the court.

Okay, so go find another nutbar with a blog you think has a slant on this Bundy case that need to be posted.

You are confused....there have been some court actions as the article stated...read it again...

Irregardless...perhaps the following will help you understand.


http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/04/blm-worried-cliven-bundy-might-prescriptive-rights-might-use-defense-court/
 
Letter From Black Marine Makes Powerful Case For Clive Bundy

The media has conspired to demonize Bundy...it will not work...it has deceived some but it will not affect the outcome of this case...and eventually Nevada will regain control of all of its public lands and the feds will be forced to cease their land grabbing criminal schemes that have led them to involve themselves with corrupt politicians like Harry(dirty hairy) Reed.

We should all applaud this Black Marine for standing up for the truth though no doubt he will get much flak for it.

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2014/04/26/eye-opening-black-marine-letter-makes-powerful-case-for-why-bundy-is-not-a-racist-114936
 
Let me sum up the reality of this serious confrontation between the BLM and the Western Ranchers in several states.

To an astonishing degree,Western States lack sovereignty over their own territory. Most of the land is under the control of the Federalis...who mistakenly and illegally claim it is owned by the Federal Government.....................And the federal agencies that rule over federal lands have agendas. At every opportunity, it seems, they restrict not only what can be done on so called federal lands, but on privately-owned property as well.

They are hostile to traditional industries like logging, mining and ranching, and if you have a puddle in your back yard, the EPA will try to regulate it as a navigable waterway.

That is only a slight exaggeration.

bundy.ranch_.nev

One could say that Cliven Bundy is just one more victim of progress and changing mores. The federal government has gotten more environmentally-conscious, and now we really, really care about desert tortoises. (It was the designation of desert tortoises as an endangered species that gave BLM the opportunity to squeeze Bundy in the early 1990s.) But here’s the thing: the Bureau of Land Management–the federal government–is not necessarily anti-development. Rather, its attitude depends entirely on what sort of development is in question.

Thus, BLM has developed a grandiose plan to develop vast solar energy installations on federal land across the Southwest. Wind power projects are favored, too. In fact, the same BLM that has driven Nevada’s ranchers out of business has welcomed solar projects with open arms. Some have claimed that Harry Reid is behind the BLM’s war against Cliven Bundy, on the theory that he wants the land for a solar project in which his son Rory is involved, along with the Chinese.


So it is possible that the federal government is driving Bundy off federal lands to make way for mitigation activities that enable the solar energy development to the north. But I don’t think it is necessary to go there. Rather–this is the second and more important point–it is obvious that some activities are favored by the Obama administration’s BLM, and others are disfavored. The favored developments include solar and wind projects. No surprise there: the developers of such projects are invariably major Democratic Party donors. Wind and solar energy survive only by virtue of federal subsidies, so influencing people like Barack Obama and Harry Reid is fundamental to the developers’ business plans. Ranchers, on the other hand, ask nothing from the federal government other than the continuation of their historic rights. It is a safe bet that Cliven Bundy is not an Obama or Reid contributor.

Solar energy projects don't draw BLM snipers


The new head of the BLM is a former Reid staffer. Presumably he was placed in his current position on Reid’s recommendation. Harry Reid is known to be a corrupt politician, one who has gotten wealthy on a public employee’s salary, in part, at least, by benefiting from sweetheart real estate deals. Does Harry Reid now control more than 80% of the territory of Nevada? If you need federal authority to conduct business in Nevada–which is overwhelmingly probable–do you need to pay a bribe to Harry Reid or a member of his family to get that permission? Why is it that the BLM is deeply concerned about desert tortoises when it comes to ranchers, but couldn’t care less when the solar power developers from China come calling? Environmentalists have asked this question. Does the difference lie in the fact that Cliven Bundy has never contributed to an Obama or Reid campaign, or paid a bribe to Reid or a member of his family?

Based on the evidence, I would say: yes, that is probably the difference. When the desert tortoises balance out, Occam’s razor tells us that the distinction is political.

So let’s have some sympathy for Cliven Bundy and his family. They don’t have a chance on the law, because under the Endangered Species Act and many other federal statutes, the agencies are always in the right. And their way of life is one that, frankly, is on the outs. They don’t develop apps. They don’t ask for food stamps. It probably has never occurred to them to bribe a politician. They don’t subsist by virtue of government subsidies or regulations that hamstring competitors. They aren’t illegal immigrants. They have never even gone to law school. So what possible place is there for the Bundys in the Age of Obama?
 
The media has conspired to demonize Bundy...it will not work...it has deceived some but it will not affect the outcome of this case...and eventually Nevada will regain control of all of its public lands and the feds will be forced to cease their land grabbing criminal schemes that have led them to involve themselves with corrupt politicians like Harry(dirty hairy) Reed.

We should all applaud this Black Marine for standing up for the truth though no doubt he will get much flak for it.

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2014/04...ful-case-for-why-bundy-is-not-a-racist-114936

Nevada can't regain control...it never had control. 85% of Nevada is federal land, it is in the Nevada Constitution.

Laughable that you complain about lack a of honest debate but you are so dishonest.
 
Nevada can't regain control...it never had control. 85% of Nevada is federal land, it is in the Nevada Constitution.

Laughable that you complain about lack a of honest debate but you are so dishonest.

Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaa It has been explained but you are so overwhelmed with your agenda and that movie playing in your head the truth could not get in there between your ears.
 
The Constitutional Basis For Western States To Gain Control Of Their Public Lands

According to the ranchers’ argument, the federal government “owned” or controlled every territory before it became a state, but once statehood was reached, the land became the property of the new state.

So how is it that the U.S. government owns 84 percent of Nevada? It certainly looks like Nevada citizens are being treated unfairly. It is almost as if Washington, D.C., is treating Nevada like a child that can’t manage itself.

Ranchers support Cliven Bundy

Many Western states were treated unequally when they joined the Union. Unlike Eastern states, Congress reserved vast amounts of federally-owned land in the “Enabling Acts” for statehood in the West. Article 4, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution requires an act of Congress to create a state. Keeping the majority of land in federal control seems in conflict with the very concept of statehood. The second paragraph of Section 4 appears to authorize this bizarre practice. But on closer inspection, that is far from clear.
 
According to the ranchers’ argument, the federal government “owned” or controlled every territory before it became a state, but once statehood was reached, the land became the property of the new state.

So how is it that the U.S. government owns 84 percent of Nevada? It certainly looks like Nevada citizens are being treated unfairly. It is almost as if Washington, D.C., is treating Nevada like a child that can’t manage itself.

Ranchers support Cliven Bundy

Many Western states were treated unequally when they joined the Union. Unlike Eastern states, Congress reserved vast amounts of federally-owned land in the “Enabling Acts” for statehood in the West. Article 4, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution requires an act of Congress to create a state. Keeping the majority of land in federal control seems in conflict with the very concept of statehood. The second paragraph of Section 4 appears to authorize this bizarre practice. But on closer inspection, that is far from clear.

Clear to all but morons.
 
According to the ranchers’ argument, the federal government “owned” or controlled every territory before it became a state, but once statehood was reached, the land became the property of the new state.

So how is it that the U.S. government owns 84 percent of Nevada? It certainly looks like Nevada citizens are being treated unfairly. It is almost as if Washington, D.C., is treating Nevada like a child that can’t manage itself.

Ranchers support Cliven Bundy

Many Western states were treated unequally when they joined the Union. Unlike Eastern states, Congress reserved vast amounts of federally-owned land in the “Enabling Acts” for statehood in the West. Article 4, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution requires an act of Congress to create a state. Keeping the majority of land in federal control seems in conflict with the very concept of statehood. The second paragraph of Section 4 appears to authorize this bizarre practice. But on closer inspection, that is far from clear.

Nobody care sleeper cell
 
This is a excellent article that explains the complexities involved in the Bundy Vs. BLM dispute...it is not rocket science but obviously complicated enough that many cannot understand it...some though do understand it but since it conflicts with their agenda they pretend not to.


http://www.dailypaul.com/316860/why-the-nevada-vs-blm-land-ownership-issue-is-confusing

The article is wrong. How many times do you have to have this pointed out to you?

“The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States….”
Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2, U.S. Constitution
 
The article is correct

The article is wrong. How many times do you have to have this pointed out to you?

“The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States….”
Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2, U.S. Constitution

The article is correct....you simply do not want to believe it and you probably choose not to believe the Constitution either.
 
Only the right prefers to soothsay doomsdays for free, but on a potential contingency basis. The left knows to charge doomsday tax rates for it.
 
The Cowboys Won

The Federalis were pushed out by a few courageous cowboys....hopefully to never return....if they do...the Cowboys may have to take some more serious measures.

The tide of public opinion is against the Federalis...they bit off more than they could chew.



 
Back
Top