PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
so you've committed to a prediction?......
It won’t be thrown out.
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
so you've committed to a prediction?......
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
you obviously don't since, like Bragg, you don't even know what felony Trump intended to conceal......
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
I don't think he has a lot of experience with those, either.....
Why do you think Bragg doesn’t know?
I’ll predict that the case will not be dismissed due to a barebones indictment.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
because he didn't identify it (them) in the indictment as would have been appropriate.......if there was such a felony any competent prosecutor would have charged Trump with its commission.....
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
lol.....after six years Bragg was pressed for time and had to settle for a barebones indictment which turned out to be a single incomplete charge repeated 34 times.........you people are a sad joke......
It would not have been appropriate to include it in the indictment. That would’ve been sloppy legal work. Obviously you have not done much criminal work. Look up any criminal case you can think of and the indictment will be bare bones.
There may be lots of reasons a criminal charge would not have been prosecuted. Most notably, that I can think of, because Bill Barr was the Attorney General and Donald Trump was the president. During that period of time there would not be a single chance in hell, the justice department would prosecute a federal crime against Donald Trump.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
it certainly would have been appropriate, if it was a crime Trump should have been indicted for......
Occam's Razor: or there weren't facts to support it, or the statute of limitations had run, or it was a misdemeanor and didn't meet the requirement of 175.10......
An incomplete charge?
You have no idea how indictments work if you fall for the conservative media screaming claims that this one is insufficient. The indictment is in fact perfect Period.
The law does not require the criminal act, the one that he should have been indicted for.
The law does not require that the crime Trump was lying to avoid be prosecuted, or that a prosecution would be successful, or that the statute of limitations not have passed. The only requirement is that the fraudulent document be filed in order to conceal a criminal act.
You keep throwing, pretend and fake requirements. In front of Alvin, Bragg, pitiful.
Nobody settles for a bare bones indictment, its how indictments are done. You are such a clown, you know what I am saying is true. Unless you are dumber than I thought.
I am sure you never did Criminal law, but I have. I prosecuted and defended.
Of course they did. See the certified electoral vote sent by Georgia to the National Archive.
You must thinking of the forged electoral votes the Republicans illegally submitted.
Delusion fallacy.
Never voted for Biden or supported any of his legislative proposals. Both Biden and Trump have bankrupted the U. S.
True, to the fact that prosecutors use lies, innuendo and non-credible witnesses to convince a (liberal NY) grand jury to indict.
That must be why you were demoted to chasing ambulances.
Back that up.
The Chinese Disease, Biden, and his open borders have bankrupted this country
They also use evidence and testimony. Trump is guilty of paying off women and hiding it through payoffs. He used bookkeeping tricks to hide that he was doing it to help his election chances. That made it a campaign expense.