You're the one who doesn't do the work. You don't research anything you say, and when you do it ends up undermining your argument.
Koch study: medicare for all saves money
- Thread starter evince
- Start date
You're the one who doesn't do the work. You don't research anything you say, and when you do it ends up undermining your argument.
No we did not you incoherent dullard. But I get it, you hate America because you've got your head stuck up your asshole.
You're the one who said this:
Which is what economic and/or social mobility is, douchebag.
Opportunities for wealth literally means economic mobility.
It's so hilarious how you keep undermining your own shitty argument.
How many countries are there in Europe you incoherent dumbass?
I get it, you're a hate filled mongrel with a chop on your shoulder that hates America. Go cry to your fucking momma asshat.
Yes, we did.
We sent troops over there. We flew sorties. We dropped bombs. We invaded Iraq and Afghanistan and dragged most of NATO along with us.
Sorry asshat, you couldn't assemble a coherent thought if your life depended on it. But you've got crying, bloviating and hating America down pat.
Run along, you're like a barking chihuahua with issues.
THAT IS NOT WHAT YOU WERE ARGUING.
You weren't arguing that the US is better than some of Europe, becuase that would mean you'd concede that social democracies do, in fact, create wealth...moreso than in the US depending on which metric you look at, but still universal across all of them.
You were arguing the US is better than all of it.
That's what you said, and now you're trying to walk it all back by shifting the goalposts.
Dear moron; we didn't start the wars over there. We didn't drag our allies into them. But I get it; you're a hate filled mongrel chihuahua with Anti-America issues.
STFU, seriously.
You tried to say that social democracies have less wealth per individual (whatever weird statistic that is), and in doing so you ended up showing that two social democracies rank better than us.
You didn't even read the link you posted, did you?
What a sloppy idiot.
Get out of your mom's basement once in while chihuahua.
I broke the post-bot.
Yes, we did. Otherwise, we wouldn't even be in those countries today.
Yes, we did. Specifically NATO in Afghanistan, and then some of our traditional allies in Iraq like Britain.
You don't know what the hell you're talking about, and you undermine your own arguments even as you shift the goalposts.
Yes, that is basically what I was arguing. We have MORE wealth, MORE opportunity and MORE diversity than most of the world. That is pretty obvious except to a bloviating America hating mongrel like you.
Stop putting words in my statements you whiny mongrel.
You've moved to straight out lying now. Not a shocker you barking mongrel.
No it isn't; but I get it. You're nothing more than a deranged America hating chihuahua with issues. I get it.
LMFAO!
No one can be this stupid. They brought on the wars themselves. The Taliban protected the plotters of 9-11. They could have easily avoided war by complying with International requests. It was a UN action you ignorant mongrel moron.
Iraq was brought on by Saddam when he invaded a member state of the UN and was forced out. He then spent the next decade defying the agreements HE agreed to.
STFU, seriously.
Wrong and stupid. You're quite good at both.
Thar she bloviates again!
Try to be honest asshat. For once in your miserable pathetic mongrel existence.
Yes, that is basically what I was arguing. We have MORE wealth, MORE opportunity and MORE diversity than most of the world. That is pretty obvious except to a bloviating America hating mongrel like you.
That's not what you were saying at all.
You said we have more than the social democracies. In fact, here's how the thread went:
Then you said:
So that was in response to the social democracies, not just generally the world.
So you shifted the goalposts, and you're trying to shift them again because you didn't do the work necessary to know what you're saying.
You're such a whiny little bitch, you can't just admit you've been speaking out of your ass this whole time.
You're the one shifting the goalposts here.
First you said that social democracies have less wealth. When I proved that wasn't true using GDP-per-Capita, you shifted your argument that some social democracies have more wealth by accident when you posted your link showing the US trailing two social democracies
It's all there in the thread, dude.
You gaslit your own argument.
What a douchebag.
Check the thread as I did and see for yourself.
You said, broadly, that social democracies "have less wealth" than the US. Then you posted a link showing that wasn't true!
That is precisely what you did.
You made a broad statement, that social democracies have less wealth, then I posted data showing GDP-per-capita was higher in several social democracies, then you posted data showing wealth per adult (again, WTF measurement is that!?) was still lower than two social democracies.
So your initial broad statement about wealth was completely wrong.
And you didn't even address the other takedowns of that shitty post, like home ownership rate and productivity.