Lies About CRT makes it worse

LV426 said:
It's proven in your lazy posts.

It's proven in your lazy attempt to pretend you're something you're not.

The only reason you pretended to be a teacher was so that your argument against public education would have credibility.

Strip out your fake "experience" and you got nothing.
Click to expand...
I'm sure you would like everyone here to believe all that to be accurate, though we both know it's not...
Would you be willing to bet money on it? We both know you would not..;)
 
TOP said:
Would you be willing to bet money on it? We both know you would not..;)
Click to expand...

Why would I make a bet with someone who has already lied to me about other things?

There's nothing that says you'd even honor a bet. I think you'd welch on it and then pretend like you never made it.
 
LV426 said:
Why would I make a bet with someone who has already lied to me about other things?

There's nothing that says you'd even honor a bet. I think you'd welch on it and then pretend like you never made it.
Click to expand...

You wouldn't make a bet, because you know you'd lose...;) There's no reason for me to lie....No chance of me having to "welch" because I would win..;)
 
TOP said:
You wouldn't make a bet, because you know you'd lose...;) There's no reason for me to lie....No chance of me having to "welch" because I would win..;)
Click to expand...

Any bet I make with you depends 100% on your capacity for honesty, which you've already said you don't feel you need to be on JPP.

So how come you won't be honest with people here?
 
LV426 said:
Any bet I make with you depends 100% on your capacity for honesty, which you've already said you don't feel you need to be on JPP.
Click to expand...
Well, I'm being honest...you're completely confused and disingenuous....
Another interesting claim, btw...;)
 
LV426 said:
What specific race hustling lies and Marxist distortions?
Click to expand...

Critical race theory is an academic discipline, formulated in the 1990s and built on the intellectual framework of identity-based Marxism. Relegated for many years to universities and obscure academic journals, it has increasingly become the default ideology in our public institutions over the past decade. It has been injected into government agencies, public school systems, teacher training programs and corporate human resources departments in the form of diversity training programs, human resources modules, public policy frameworks and school curricula.

Its supporters deploy a series of euphemisms to describe critical race theory, including “equity,” “social justice,” “diversity and inclusion” and “culturally responsive teaching.”
Critical race theorists, masters of language construction, realize that “neo-Marxism” would be a hard sell. Equity, on the other hand, sounds nonthreatening and is easily confused with the American principle of equality. But the distinction is vast and important. Indeed, critical race theorists explicitly reject equality — the principle proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence, defended in the Civil War and codified into law with the 14th and 15th Amendments, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. To them, equality represents “mere nondiscrimination” and provides “camouflage” for white supremacy, patriarchy and oppression.

In contrast to equality, equity as defined and promoted by critical race theorists is little more than reformulated Marxism. In the name of equity, UCLA law professor and critical race theorist Cheryl Harris has proposed suspending private property rights, seizing land and wealth and redistributing them along racial lines.

Critical race guru Ibram X. Kendi, who directs the Center for Antiracist Research at Boston University, has proposed the creation of a federal Department of Antiracism. This department would be independent of (i.e., unaccountable to) the elected branches of government and would have the power to nullify, veto or abolish any law at any level of government and curtail the speech of political leaders and others deemed insufficiently “antiracist.”

One practical result of the creation of such a department would be the overthrow of capitalism, since, according to Kendi, “in order to truly be antiracist, you also have to truly be anticapitalist.”

In other words, identity is the means; Marxism is the end.

An equity-based form of government would mean the end not only of private property but also of individual rights, equality under the law, federalism and freedom of speech. These would be replaced by race-based redistribution of wealth, group-based rights, active discrimination and omnipotent bureaucratic authority.
https://nypost.com/2021/05/06/what-critical-race-theory-is-really-about/

Critical Race Theory Says Everything is Racist - Voddie Baucham at Flat Creek Baptist Church

CRT Principles:

1. “Racism is ordinary, not aberrational” (p. 8). To say that racism is ordinary is not to say that it is good or acceptable. Rather, racism is part of our social fabric, to the point that we don’t even recognize it many times. This is a moment for humility in admitting that the Church is often racist and, more broadly, that systemic racism does exist.

LIE.

2. Racism is maintained by “interest convergence” or “material determinism” (p. 9). If you rolled your eyes (or wanted to roll your eyes) at the above mention of systemic racism, then this second principle will help to understand the reality of systemic racism. We should not need slave whips or lynching trees to be persuaded that racism exists (Christians in the 19th and 20th centuries had slave whips and lynching trees and still did not believe in racism as a social evil). “Interest convergence” is the idea that white people do not have any direct interest in eradicating racism. At times, white interests converge with anti-racist interests, and so something positive occasionally results. The point for the church is the need to recognize our general investment in white interests and to throw ourselves equally into the interests of others (As a side note but related to this point, I would strongly urge you to study a variety of liberation theologies, particularly evangelical liberation theologies, although you should always start with Gustavo Gutiérrez.)

LIE.

3. “Race and races are products of social thought and relations” (p. 9). We must - we must - accept that “race” is a social construct. That’s it for this point. If you don’t accept that (and I don’t assume that everyone does, because I know a lot of different kinds of people), then let’s talk.

LIE.

4. “Each race has its own origins and ever-evolving history,” a concept referred to as “differential racialization” (pp. 9-10). In other words, while race is a harmful social construct, not everyone who has suffered from racism has suffered in the same way. This is an important recognition on the part of critical race theorists, particularly in the U.S. context, because racism does not refer only to the experience of African Americans, as significant as that experience is in our national and ecclesiastical history.

LIE.

https://langueorparole.blogspot.com/2021/02/principles-of-critical-race-theory.html
 
TOP said:
So no proof...and that work ethic comment makes no sense....
Click to expand...

It makes perfect sense.

He was trying to undermine the integrity of the 2020 election because he didn't want to put in the work to make Trump and his failures appealing for voters, so instead of trying to get more people to vote for Trump, he threw the entire election into question because it's easier than defending Trump's record.
 
LV426 said:
It makes perfect sense.

He was trying to undermine the integrity of the 2020 election because he didn't want to put in the work to make Trump and his failures appealing for voters, so instead of trying to get more people to vote for Trump, he threw the entire election into question because it's easier than defending Trump's record.
Click to expand...
So no proof....nothing to do with work ethic...
Are you at work? Or if you can't answer that, do you work? I'm trying to see if you understand "work ethic"....
 
Truth Detector said:
Critical race theory is an academic discipline, formulated in the 1990s and built on the intellectual framework of identity-based Marxism. Relegated for many years to universities and obscure academic journals, it has increasingly become the default ideology in our public institutions over the past decade. It has been injected into government agencies, public school systems, teacher training programs and corporate human resources departments in the form of diversity training programs, human resources modules, public policy frameworks and school curricula.
Click to expand...


Again, specifics?


Truth Detector said:
Its supporters deploy a series of euphemisms to describe critical race theory, including “equity,” “social justice,” “diversity and inclusion” and “culturally responsive teaching.”
Click to expand...

OK, so?


Truth Detector said:
Critical race theorists, masters of language construction, realize that “neo-Marxism” would be a hard sell. Equity, on the other hand, sounds nonthreatening and is easily confused with the American principle of equality. But the distinction is vast and important. Indeed, critical race theorists explicitly reject equality — the principle proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence, defended in the Civil War and codified into law with the 14th and 15th Amendments, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. To them, equality represents “mere nondiscrimination” and provides “camouflage” for white supremacy, patriarchy and oppression.
Click to expand...

So you think equality and Marxism are the same thing?


In contrast to equality, equity as defined and promoted by critical race theorists is little more than reformulated Marxism. In the name of equity, UCLA law professor and critical race theorist Cheryl Harris has proposed suspending private property rights, seizing land and wealth and redistributing them along racial lines.
Click to expand...

Is that what she truly proposed? Let's see her actual proposal.


One practical result of the creation of such a department would be the overthrow of capitalism, since, according to Kendi, “in order to truly be antiracist, you also have to truly be anticapitalist.”
Click to expand...

Well, capitalism cannot survive without socialism, so...


In other words, identity is the means; Marxism is the end.
Click to expand...

You've failed to actually make the connection between the two.


An equity-based form of government would mean the end not only of private property but also of individual rights, equality under the law, federalism and freedom of speech. These would be replaced by race-based redistribution of wealth, group-based rights, active discrimination and omnipotent bureaucratic authority.
Click to expand...

It wouldn't mean the end of private property...it would mean the end of someone's private property being valued more than someone else's, purely along racial lines.

And you already redistributed wealth thanks to your tax cut, and all that did was plunge the economy into a recession before COVID.
 
Truth Detector said:
“Racism is ordinary, not aberrational”[/b] (p. 8). To say that racism is ordinary is not to say that it is good or acceptable. Rather, racism is part of our social fabric, to the point that we don’t even recognize it many times. This is a moment for humility in admitting that the Church is often racist and, more broadly, that systemic racism does exist.[/i]
Click to expand...

If you don't think systemic racism exists, then you are saying that you believe people are BORN racist.

So do you believe racism is genetic? Because that's the only possible explanation for racism in America today if you aren't going to accept the premise of systemic racism.

So is that what you believe?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top