ExpressLane
Verified User
But you said if a person was indicted by a grand jury they were guilty. If that were true we could just do away with trials.
Monica Lewinsky Asks Bill Clinton....
- Thread starter Libhater
- Start date
Mason Michaels
Verified User
Pretty late bringing up Monica!
As if that would give Trump a pass!
Trumpsters are the most desperate motherfuckers ever
As if that would give Trump a pass!
Trumpsters are the most desperate motherfuckers ever
I dropped an R. You see, I recognize my mistakes, because I have an education.
Have you figured out why saying "69" is a double entendre and not sarcasm?
No indictment does not mean there was no evidence. Prosecutors are supposed to have enough evidence to get a prosecution to go for an indictment. That is to say there can be a lot of evidence and no prosecution.
No evidence does not mean there was no crime. No evidence means you cannot prove a crime.
No, he did not.
ExpressLane
Verified User
Bradley Smith explains what is a campaign expense that MUST be reported.
Yes, you have a primary education. I have a collegiate education.
I used sarcasm to mock or convey contempt of this demeaning act by the sexual predator, old Bill.
Do you understand now, Walter?
You beat me to it...poor Walter.
Kudlow said "there was no crime, right." Smith says "right."
Poor Walter has, once again, been proven wrong.
Last edited:
No, you did not.
Sarcasm would be saying something like "trump is known for his honesty, and loyalty to his family." Saying that trump gave Daniels $690,000 would be a double entendre. Can you see the difference?
Into the Night
Verified User
Clinton's perjury is illegal, Sock. He got disbarred for it too. Guess you forgot about that, Sock.
Making shit up won't work, Sock.
Into the Night
Verified User
Convict on what crime, Sock?
Have an adult read this to you and explain:
"Sarcasm-the use of irony to mock or convey contempt."
That's how I used it Walter.
You got the figure that I posted wrong too, Walter-"It was $810,000.69 and free toothpaste and mouthwash for the rest of her life."
Did you see the video that proved you wrong, Walter?
Last edited:
Clinton was not disbarred. He was certainly never convicted of perjury.
The only irony is that you did not know it was not sarcasm.
Yes, he was disbarred...before the Supreme Court.
Clinton Disbarred From Practice Before Supreme Court
The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com › 2001/10/01 › national › cli...
Oct 1, 2001 — WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court ordered former President Clinton disbarred from practicing law before the high court on Monday and gave ...
Your lack of education precedes you, Walter.
Did you view the video provided proving you wrong about what Smith said?
And (sic) "Whenever a member of the bar of this court has been disbarred or suspended from practice of any court of record, or has engaged in conduct unbecoming a member of the bar of this court, the court will enter an order suspending that member from practice before this court,"
https://www.nytimes.com/2001/10/01/...arred-from-practice-before-supreme-court.html
Last edited:
Trump has 34 charges. Most of them are for financial and bookkeeping crimes trying to hide the payoffs. Trump was certain that the affairs would harm his election chances. He greatly overestimated the Trumpy followers. He thought they cared about morals and values. Later he realized he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose any votes.
Trump has to answer for 11 falsified invoices, 12 counts of false ledger entries to hide the payments and Falsely recording hush money payments as a "retainer".
Which post did I write that?
I said they wouldn't be indicted unless something they were being accused of was a criminal act. They are being accused of acts which federal/state criminal statutes specifically define.
Walter, come out from underneath your desk.
It's safe now. I am going to allow the other bright, erudite Conservatives to continue eating your lunch.
Did Walter see the video provided proving him wrong and leave the building...dragging his shield, not wearing it?
It's safe now. I am going to allow the other bright, erudite Conservatives to continue eating your lunch.
Did Walter see the video provided proving him wrong and leave the building...dragging his shield, not wearing it?
Last edited:
EL, Walter is no fun at all...especially when he loses.
I only have an undergraduate degree, "BSEE" with minors in Literature and History (they demand well-rounded engineers at Vandy).
Walter has a primary degree...high school, yet he only had 4-5 boo boos. Not bad, considering.
I suspect that you have an array of degrees.
I only have an undergraduate degree, "BSEE" with minors in Literature and History (they demand well-rounded engineers at Vandy).
Walter has a primary degree...high school, yet he only had 4-5 boo boos. Not bad, considering.
I suspect that you have an array of degrees.